Article contents
Entrapped Entrepreneurship: Labour contractors in the South Indian garment industry*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2014
Abstract
As neoliberal restructuring leads to the rise of labour market intermediaries globally, labour contractors are being vilified as unscrupulous recruiters and as wicked figures who exploit and harass. Based on long-term ethnographic research among workers and contractors in the Tamil Nadu garment industry, this article argues for a more careful and grounded analysis of labour contractors’ role and position under neoliberalization. Evidence is presented of contractors’ precarious position at the tail end of global production networks and three conclusions are drawn. First, contractors reveal themselves to be a remarkably unrecognized source of entrepreneurship, flexibility, and skills acquisition, which facilitates manufacturers’ participation in global markets. Second, despite their resourcefulness and resilience, contractors find themselves trapped between management and the workforce, and in an overall situation of vulnerability as a result of the informal nature of their activities and the vagaries of the neoliberal market. For many of them this results in a highly fluid and unstable class experience, in which they struggle to materialize aspirations for upward mobility. Finally, neoliberal conditions tend to undermine rather than enhance contractors’ entrepreneurial success and to weaken rather than intensify their power with regard to both capital and labour.
- Type
- FORUM: Class Matters: New Ethnographic Perspectives on the Politics of Indian Labour
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
Footnotes
The research upon which this paper is based was supported by an ESRC-DfID research grant (RES-167-25-0296). I am grateful to Priya, Arul, and Muthu for research assistance in the field. The paper was presented at the ‘Ethnographic Perspectives on Work and Labour’ seminar at the London School of Economics in March 2010 and benefited from comments made by the participants. All shortcomings remain my own.
References
1 De Neve, G. (2009). Power, Inequality and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Politics of Ethical Compliance in the South Indian Garment Industry. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIV:22, pp. 63–71Google Scholar.
2 Barrientos, S. (2013). ‘Labour Chains’: Analysing the Role of Labour Contractors in Global Production Networks. Journal of Development Studies, 49:8, pp. 1058–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Barrientos, S. (2008). Contract Labour: The ‘Achilles Heel’ of Corporate Codes of Commercial Value Chains. Development and Change, 39:6, pp. 977–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Thompson, E.P. (1978). The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays, Merlin Press, LondonGoogle Scholar; Chandavarkar, R. (1994). The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Chandavarkar, The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India; Chandavarkar, R. (1997). ‘The Making of the Working Class’: E.P. Thompson and Indian History. History Workshop Journal, 43, pp. 177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Gooptu, N. (2009). Neoliberal Subjectivity, Enterprise Culture and New Workplaces: Organised Retail and Shopping Malls in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 44:22, pp. 45–54Google Scholar; Lukose, R. (2009). Liberalization's Children: Gender, Youth, and Consumer Citizenship in Globalizing India, Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mankekar, P. (2010). ‘Becoming Entrepreneurial Subjects: Neoliberalism and Media’ in Gupta, A. and Sivaramakrishnan, K.The State in India After Liberalization: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Routledge Publications, New Delhi, pp. 213–231Google Scholar; Sanchez, A. (2012). Questioning Success: Dispossession and the Criminal Entrepreneur in Urban India. Critique of Anthropology, 32:4, pp. 435–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Gooptu, N. (2013). ‘Introduction’ in Gooptu, N.Enterprise Culture in Neoliberal India: Studies in Youth, Class, Work and Media, Routledge, Oxford, p. 8Google Scholar.
8 Chari, S. (2004). Fraternal Capital: Peasant-workers, Self-made Men and Globalization in Provincial India, Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar.
9 Phillips, N. (2011). Informality, Global Production Networks and the Dynamics of ‘Adverse Incorporation’. Global Networks, 11:3, pp. 380–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cross, J. (2010). Neoliberalism as Unexceptional: Economic Zones and the Everyday Precariousness of Working Life in South India. Critique of Anthropology, 30:4, pp. 355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Phillips, Informality, Global Production Networks and the Dynamics of ‘Adverse Incorporation’, p. 380.
11 Roy, T. (2008). Sardars, Jobbers, Kanganies: The Labour Contractor and Indian Economic History. Modern Asian Studies, 42:5, pp. 971–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Chakrabarty, D. (1989). Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal 1890–1940, Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar; Chandavarkar, The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India; Chandavarkar, R. (2008). The Decline and Fall of the Jobber System in the Bombay Textile Industry, 1870–1955. Modern Asian Studies, 42:1, pp. 117–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roy, Sardars, Jobber, Kanganies; Sen, S. (2010). Commercial Recruiting and Informal Intermediation: Debate over the Sardari System in Assam Tea Plantations, 1860–1900. Modern Asian Studies, 44:1, pp. 3–28Google Scholar.
13 Chandavarkar, The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India, p. 199.
14 Breman, J., Guérin, I. and Prakash, A. (2009). India's Unfree Workforce: Of Bondage Old and New, Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar.
15 Guérin I. and Venkatasubramanian G. (2009). ‘Corridors of migration and chains of dependence: Brick kiln moulders in Tamil Nadu’ in Breman, Guérin, and Prakash India's Unfree Workforce; Prakash, A. (2009). ‘How (Un)free are the workers in the labour market? A case study of brick kilns’ in Breman, Guérin and Prakash, India's Unfree Workforce; Roesch, M. (2009). ‘Bonded labour in the rice mills: fate or opportunity kilns’ in Breman, Guérin and Prakash, India's Unfree Workforce.
16 Picherit, D. (2009). ‘“Workers trust us!” Labour middlemen and the rise of the lower castes in Andhra Pradesh’ in Breman, Guérin and Prakash India's Unfree Workforce, p. 263; see also Picherit, D. (2012). Migrant Labourers’ Struggles Between Village and Urban Migration Sites: Labour Standards, Rural Development and Politics in South India. Global Labour Journal, 3:1, pp. 143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 Picherit, ‘Workers trust us!’, pp. 262–264.
18 Chakrabarty, Rethinking Working-Class History; Picherit, ‘Workers trust us!’, pp. 263–264.
19 Picherit, ‘Workers trust us!’, pp. 272–277.
20 Barrientos, ‘Labour Chains’, p. 1062.
21 Coe, N., Jennings, J. and Ward, K. (2007). Mapping the Globalisation of the Temporary Staffing Industry. The Professional Geographer, 59:4, pp. 503–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Peck, J., Theodore, N. and Ward, K. (2005). Constructing Markets for Temporary Employment: Employment Liberalisation and the Internationalisation of the Staffing Industry. Global Networks, 5, pp. 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rogaly, B. (2008). Intensification of Work-Place Regimes in British Agriculture: The Role of Migrant Workers. Population, Space and Place, 14:6, pp. 497–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wills, J. (2009). Subcontracted Employment and its Challenge to Labor. Labor Studies Journal, 34:4, pp. 441–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Barrientos, ‘Labour Chains’; Barrientos, Contract Labour.
23 Kelly, P. (2001). The Political Economy of Local Labor Control Regimes in the Philippines. Economic Geography, 77:1, pp. 1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Kelly, The Political Economy of Local Labor Control Regimes in the Philippines, p. 1.
25 De Neve, G. (2003). Expectations and Rewards of Modernity: Commitment and Mobility Among Rural Migrants in Tirupur, Tamil Nadu. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 37:1&2, pp. 251–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 For detail on types of firms, see De Neve, G. (2012). Fordism, Flexible Specialisation and CSR: How Indian Garment Worker Critique Neoliberal Labour Regimes. Ethnography, <http://eth.sagepub.com>, available at doi:10.1177/1466138112463801,+available+at+doi:10.1177/1466138112463801>Google Scholar [accessed 28 January 2014].
27 All names are pseudonyms.
28 Powertable tailoring refers to work on power-driven sewing machines that are used to produce flatlock and overlock stitches.
29 Chari, Fraternal Capital; De Neve, Expectations and Rewards of Modernity.
30 Singer tailoring, derived from the Singer brand name, refers to work on sewing machines that are foot-operated, produce different stitches from powertable machines, and require longer to learn to operate.
31 Scheduled Caste is a generic administrative term that covers all Dalit communities.
32 Coe, N. and Jordhus-Lier, D. (2011). Constrained Agency? Re-evaluating the Geographies of Labour. Progress in Human Geography, 35:2, p. 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
33 Barrientos, Contract Labour; Barrientos, ‘Labour Chains’.
34 Barrientos, ‘Labour Chains’; Picherit, ‘Workers trust us!’.
35 De Neve, G. (2008). Global Garment Chains, Local Labour Activism: New Challenges to Trade Unionism and NGO Activism in the Tiruppur Garment Cluster, South India. Research in Economic Anthropology, 28, pp. 213–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
36 Fuller, C. and Narasimhan, H. (2007). Information Technology Professionals and the New-rich Middle Class in Chennai (Madras). Modern Asian Studies, 41:1, pp. 121–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nisbett, N. (2009). Growing up in the Knowledge Society: Living the IT Dream in Bangalore, Routledge Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar.
37 Gooptu, Neoliberal Subjectivity, Enterprise Culture and New Workplaces.
38 Gooptu, ‘Introduction’, p. 8–9.
39 Cross, Neoliberalism as Unexceptional.
40 Phillips, Informality, Global Production Networks and the Dynamics of ‘Adverse Incorporation’.
41 Gooptu, ‘Introduction’, pp. 4 and 11.
42 Nisbett, N. (2013). ‘Youth and the practice of IT enterprise: narratives of the knowledge society and the creation of new subjectivities among Bangalore's IT aspirants’ in Gooptu, Enterprise Culture in Neoliberal India, pp. 175–189.
- 33
- Cited by