Article contents
Daladali in Calcutta in the Nineteenth Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Extract
In this paper I wish to illustrate the hypothesis that a necessary co-relate of stable social order is a system of controlled conflict. In other words, a social system depends for its cohesion on the existence of conflicts in smaller sub-systems, provided that the conflicts are conducted within an accepted convention. Hence faction-feuds in a social system are not necessarily evidence of fission in that system but may also be evidence of fusion. I wish to illustrate this theme, what Gluckman called ‘The peace in the feud’, from evidence from Calcutta in the nineteenth century.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975
References
The research for this paper was undertaken as the Director of a project, ‘Class, Caste and Politics in Calcutta, 1815–1876’. This research project was sponsored by the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, and was financed by the Indian Council of Social Science Research in 1970–71. I am most grateful to the Institute and the Council of Social Science Research in 1970–71. I am most grateful to the Institute and the Council and, more particularly, to J. P. Naik, for their generous assistance. I am also grateful to my project assistants, particularly to Prathama Sen. Mary Murnane, of the Department of History, Sydney University, has made some valuable suggestions, which were particularly helpful in revising the first draft of the paper.Google Scholar
1 Max, Gluckman, Custom and Conflict in Africa, Oxford, 1959, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
2 See for instance, Memoirs of Maharaja Nubkissen Bahadur, Calcutta, 1901,Google Scholar
or Dwijendranath Thakurer Smritikatha, in Bipinbihari, Gupta, Puratan Prasanga, Biswabharati edition, Calcutta, 1373 (Bengali era).Google Scholar
3 Carstairs, R., The Little World of an Indian District Officer, London, 1912, p. 103;Google Scholar
Jack, cf. J. C., The Economic Life of a Bengal District. A Study, Oxford, 1916, p. 53Google Scholar
and George, Johnson H., The Stranger in India or Three Years in Calcutta, London, 1843, vol. 2, p. 152.Google Scholar
4 Ralph, Nicholas W., ‘Village factions and Political parties in rural West Bengal’, Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, vol. II, 1963–1964, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
5 Mukherjee, S. N., ‘Class, Caste and Politics in Calcutta 1815–1838’, in Leach, E. R. and Mukherjee, S. N. (eds), Elites in South Asia, Cambridge, 1970.Google Scholar
6 Leonard, A. Gordon, ‘Portrait of a Bengal Revolutionary’, Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 27, p. 204.Google Scholar
7 Bernard, Cohn S., ‘From Indian Status to British Contract’, Journal of Economic History, 1961.Google Scholar
8 Collet, S. D., The Life and Letters of Raja Rammohun Roy (3rd ed.), Calcutta, 1962. See editors' notes.Google Scholar
9 Samachar Chandrika, 6 August 1836,Google Scholar
as quoted in Banerjee, B. N. (ed.), Sangbad Patre Sekaler Katha, (S.S.K.) vol. 2 (3rd ed.), Calcutta, 1356 (Bengali era), pp. 362–63.Google Scholar
10 Evans-Pritchard, E. E., The Nuer, Oxford, 1940, pp. 147–48.Google ScholarPubMed
11 For a conservative view on the importance of diversity and conflicts for progress and creativeness in a society see Eliot, T. S., Notes towards the definition of culture (paperback ed.) London, 1961.Google Scholar
12 Gaurdeshiya Samaj Sthapanartha-Pratham Sabhar Vivaran, Calcutta, 1229 (Bengali era), p. 27.Google Scholar
13 For a further discussion on the self-image of the bhadralok class see my article ‘Bhadralok in Bengali language and literature—an assay on the language of class and status’ in my forthcoming book Towards a Revolutionary Past (to be published in 1975).Google Scholar
14 Bhavani, Charan Banerjee, Kalikata Kamalalaya (reprint) Calcutta, 1343 (Bengali era), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
15 Prinsep, H. T., ‘Three generations in India 1770–1904’, India Office Library (I.O.L.) MSS. Eur. C.97/1.Google Scholar
16 Bengal Herald, 13 06 1829.Google Scholar
17 Gaurdeshiya Samaj Sthapanartha etc., p. 3.Google Scholar
18 Foreign Miscellaneous Series, National Archives of India, (F.M.S.) No. 130, ff. 113–118.Google Scholar
19 Ghosh, L. N., The modern history of the Indian chiefs, Rajas, Zaminders etc., Calcutta, 1879–1881, Vol. 2, pp. 155–7.Google Scholar
20 Bhattacharya, J. N., Hindu castes and sects, (reprint) Calcutta, 1968, p. 185.Google Scholar
21 Risley, H. H., Tribes and castes of Bengal, Calcutta, 1891, Vol. 1, p. 440.Google Scholar
22 For the profession of the Brahmins in Calcutta in the early nineteenth century see Ward, W., A view of the History, Literature and Mythology of the Hindoos London, 1817–1820, Vol. 3, p. 88 n.Google Scholar
It is interesting to note that according to 1921 census the majority of the Brahmins and Kayasthas of Calcutta were not educated in English, hence were not a part of the elite group. Census of Calcutta, 1921, Report, Pt. I. pp. 87–89.Google Scholar
23 Ronald, Inden, ‘The Hindu Chiefdom in Middle Bengal Literature’, in Edward, Dimock C., (ed.) Bengal, Literature and History, Chicago, 1967.Google Scholar
24 Ram, Bose Ram, Pratapaditya Charit, Serampore, 1801, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
25 Chandra, Roy Bharat, Annada Mangal in Bharatchandra Granthavali, Calcutta, 1369 (Bengali era), p. 11.Google Scholar
26 Ronald, Inden, op. cit. p. 30. Cf. Census of India 1921 Report Vol. I Pt. I, p. 393.Google Scholar
27 Eric, Millar, ‘Caste and Territory in Malabar’, The American Anthropologist, 1954, No. 56, pp. 410–20.Google Scholar
28 For the life of Bharat Chandra Roy see Madanmuhon, Goswami, Bharat Chandra, Delhi, 1961 and for the autobiographies of two other authors of pre-colonial Bengal see G. Whyte Kilpatrick, ‘Two autobiographical accounts from Middle Bengali Literature’, in Dimock op. cit., pp. 47–66.Google Scholar
29 Risley, , op. cit., Vol. II, p. 132.Google Scholar
30 This story about Rajballava's attempts to introduce social reform in Bengal had been told in most biographies and memoirs of the nineteenth century, but the earliest account of it appeared in print in Kartik Chandra Roy's Kshitish Vamsavali. See Banerjee, C. C., Vidyasagar, Allahabad, 1909, p. 227.Google Scholar
31 Bhattacharya, J. N., op. cit., p. 99.Google Scholar
32 Shivnath, Shastri, Ramtanu Lahiri O Tatkalin Banga samaj (3rd ed.), Calcutta, 1909, p. 2.Google Scholar
33 Dobbin, C., ‘The Parsi Panchayat in Bombay City in the nineteenth century’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 4, 1970, pp. 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Kumar, R., ‘The new Brahmans of Maharashtra’, in Low, D. A. (ed.) Soundings in Modern South Asian History, London, 1968, pp. 96–97.Google Scholar
35 Select Secret Proceedings May 1775 as quoted in Census of India 1911 Report, Vol. I part I, p. 395.Google Scholar
36 Harry, Verelst, A view of the rise, progress and present state of the English in Bengal, London 1772, pp. 27–28 n.Google Scholar
37 Census of India, 1911 Report, Vol. I, Pt. I, p. 394.Google Scholar
38 Select Secret Proceedings, March 1775, as quoted in Census of India, 1911, p. 395.Google Scholar
39 Ghose, N. N., op. cit., p. 204.Google Scholar
40 Samachar Darpan, 24 september 1831.Google Scholar
41 Ghose, N. N., op. cit., p. 171.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., p. 190.
43 Ghose, N. N. in his memoirs gives an eulogistic description of Nubkissen's Sabha: ‘Maharaja Nubkissen was the Maecenas of Bengal. There never was in this province a more munificent or more enthusiastic patron of letters and the fine arts. His home was the favourite resort of men of learning. His sabha (Association) of pundits was pre-eminently the first in the land. It has been popularly compared to the famous council of Vikramaditya.’ p. 184.Google Scholar
44 A rapid sketch of the life of Raja Radhakanta Deb Bahadur, Calcutta, 1859, p. 17.Google Scholar
45 George Johnson, op. cit., p. 229.Google Scholar
46 Risley, H. H., The Tribes and castes of Bengal, Vol. I, p. 279.Google Scholar
47 Ibid., pp. 279–80.
48 Ghose, N. N., op. cit., pp. 173–74.Google Scholar
49 Samachar Darpan, 24 september 1831.Google Scholar
50 Bhavani, Charan Banerjee, op. cit., pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
51 Ghose, N. N., op. cit., p. 186.Google Scholar
52 Hickey's Bengal Gazette, 25 september 1781 as quoted in N. N. Ghose, op. cit., p. 184.Google Scholar
53 Ghosh, L. N., The Modern history of the Indian Chiefs, etc. vol. 2, p. 51.Google Scholar
54 Ibid., p. 59.
55 Ibid., p. 68.
56 Charan, Banerjee Bhavani, op. cit., p. 33.Google Scholar
57 Samachar Darpan 5 september 1837, S.S.K., Vol. 2, p. 274.Google Scholar
58 Ghosh, N. N., op. cit., p. 191.Google Scholar
59 Ashutosh Deb started his dal in 1833 and was very active in the ‘40’s and ‘50’s of the century, but soon after his death his dal was never mentioned again. Samachar Darpan, 5 January 1833, S.S.K., Vol. 2, pp. 271–2. Cf. Dwijendranath Thakurer Smritikatha, Puratan Prasanga, pp. 285–6.Google Scholar
60 Ghosh, N. N., op. cit., pp. 204. Cf. Samachar Darpan, 24 september 1831.Google Scholar
61 Samachar Darpan, 9 July 1831. Cf. Bhavani Charan Banerjee, op. cit., p. 29.Google Scholar
62 Samachar Darpan, 5 september 1837. S.S.K., Vol. 2, pp. 273–75. In Baranagar there were five dalapatis, Pran-nath Chowdhury, Joynarayan Bandopadhyaya, Durgachran Mukhopadhyaya, Ram Ratna Roy and Kalinath Munshi. See letter to the Editor, Samachar Chandrika, as reprinted in Samachar Darpan, 6 september 1831.Google Scholar
63 Letter to the Editor Samachar Chandrika, 24 December 1831, S.S.K., Vol. 2, pp. 266–67.Google Scholar
64 See Samachar Chandrika especially 8 June 1843, 23 November, 1843, 4 February 1844 and 6 October 1845.Google Scholar
65 Samachar Darpan, 24 september 1831.Google Scholar
66 Letter to the Editor Samachar Chandrika as reprinted in Samachar Darpan, 24 December 1831. S.S.K., Vol. 2, pp. 266–67.Google Scholar
67 The Bengal Spectator, 1 september 1842,Google Scholar
as reprinted in Benoy, Ghosh (ed.), Samayikpatre Banglar Samajchitra (S.B.S.) Vol. 3, Calcutta, 1964, pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
68 Ghose, L. N., op. cit., pp. 165–66.Google Scholar
69 Rajnarayan, Bose, Atmacharit, Calcutta, 1315 (Bengali era), pp. 112–13.Google Scholar
70 Umeschandra Datter Smritikatha in Bipin, Bihari Gupta, Puratan Prasanga, pp. 179–80.Google Scholar
71 A Brief Account of the Tagore family, Calcutta, 1868, p. 5.Google Scholar
72 Samachar Darpan, 25 February 1832.Google Scholar
73 Ward, W., A view of the history etc. as mentioned in J. N. Bhattacharya, op. cit., p. 99–Google Scholar
74 Ibid.
75 Samachar Chandrika, 1 August 1844.Google Scholar
76 Samachar Chandrika, 13 February 1830, S.S.K., Vol. 2, pp. 306–7.Google Scholar
77 Carstairs, R., op. cit., p. 98.Google Scholar
78 Samachar Chandrika, 5 January 1833. S.S.K., Vol. 2, pp. 271–72.Google Scholar
79 Letter to the Editor, Samachar Darpan, 5 August 1837.Google Scholar
80 Charan, Banerjee Bhavani, op. cit., p. 30.Google Scholar
81 Samachar Chandrika, 5 July 1830.Google Scholar
Cf., Alexander's East India Magazine, vol. 1, pp. 403–4.Google Scholar
82 Letter to the Editor, Samachar Chandrika as reprinted in Samachar Darpan, 24 December 1831. S.S.K., vol. 2, pp. 266–7.Google Scholar
83 The Bengal Spectator, 1 september 1842, S.B.S., vol. 3, pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
84 Samachar Chandrika of 1830–1831 and 1844–1845.Google Scholar
85 Biprabhakti Chandrika, Calcutta 1832,Google Scholar
as reprinted in Law, N. N., Suvarnavanik, Katha o Kriti, Calcutta, 1940, vol. 1, pp. 40–50.Google Scholar
86 Dwijendranath Thakurer Smritikatha, p. 285.Google Scholar
87 Samachar Chandrika, 3 March 1845.Google Scholar
88 Mittra, K. C., Mutylal Seal, Calcutta, 1869, p. 17.Google Scholar
89 The Bengal Spectator, 1 February, 1843. S.B.S., vol. 3, pp. 135–36.Google Scholar
90 Sterling, to Raja Baidyanath, 17 June 1829. F.M.S. vol. 158, D.O. Letter.Google Scholar
91 Dwijendranath Thakurer Smritikatha, p. 281.Google Scholar
92 Samachar Darpan 21 August 1819 and 2 June 1827. S.S.K., vol. 1, pp. 171, 344–5. Cf. Samachar Chandrika, 12 May 1830.Google Scholar
93 ‘Class, Caste and Politics in Calcutta, 1815–1838’, in Edmund, Leach and Mukherjee, S. N., Elites in South Asia, Cambridge, 1970, p. 34.Google Scholar
94 F.M.S. vols 130 and 131.
95 F.M.S. vol. 9, p. 603 and vol. 157. D.O. Letters.
96 Mukherjee, , ‘Class, Caste and Politics’, pp. 66–68.Google Scholar
97 Letter to the Editor, Samachar Chandrika, 22 July 1845.Google Scholar
98 The Bengal Spectator, 1 september 1842, S.B.S. vol. 3, p. 99.Google Scholar
99 Sangbad Prabhakar, 5 september 1850 (?), S.B.S. vol. 2, pp. 174–75.Google Scholar
100 Samachar Darpan, 22 October 1831.Google Scholar
101 Samachar Darpan, 1 October 1831.Google Scholar
102 Samachar Darpan, 2 July 1831.Google Scholar
103 Samachar Darpan, 5 November 1831.Google Scholar
104 Samachar Chandrika, 30 July 1831, as quoted in Samachar Darpan.Google Scholar
105 Samachar Darpan, 6 August 1831.Google Scholar
106 George, Johnson, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 152.Google Scholar
107 Shivnath, Shastri, op. cit., pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
108 Rajnarayan, Bose, Sekal aar Ekal (reprint) Calcutta, 1363 (Bengali era), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
109 Ahmed, A. F. S., Social ideas and social change in Bengal, 1818–1835, Leiden, 1965, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
110 Calcutta Review, vol. IV (July–December, 1845), p. 385.Google Scholar
111 Evans-Pritchard, , op. cit., pp. 190–91.Google Scholar
112 For biographical notes of the members of ‘The young Bengal’ group see Shivnath Shastri, op. cit. and for an analysis of their ideology see Ghosh, B., op. cit. vol. 3, pp. 22–33.Google Scholar
113 Samachar Darpan, 23:7, 1831, S.S.K., vol. 2, p. 337.Google Scholar
114 Samachar Chandrika, 1 August 1854 and 27 January 1845.Google Scholar
115 Radhakanta Deb was the first President and Debendranath Tagore was the first secretary of The British-India Association. See Singh-Roy, P. N., The Chronicle of The British-India Association, Calcutta, 1965.Google Scholar
116 Dwijendranath Thakurer Smritikatha, p. 285.Google Scholar
117 According to the Census Report of 1911, ‘It is in Bengal that the progress has been greatest in sweeping away the vexatious restrictions on eating and drinking imposed by the caste system. Many of the leading Indian gentlemen dine without hesitation with Europeans at the Calcutta Club and in private houses, and are served on such occasions by Muhamedan table servants’, Census, 1911, Bengal, p. 388. J. N. Bhattacharya noticed the loosening of caste restrictions in 1892.Google Scholar See Bhattacharya, , op. cit., pp. 248–49.Google Scholar
118 Ralph, Nicholas, op. cit.Google Scholar
119 Dwijendranath Thakurer Smritikatha, p. 286.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by