Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:07:28.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Elections, Contained Volatility and the Indian Electorate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

William G. Vanderbok
William G. Vanderbok
Affiliation:
California Lutheran University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To the South Asianist India appears unique in the modern world. A country characterized by vast poverty and widespread illiteracy, it nevertheless has managed to maintain the civil liberties and democratic politics bequeathed to it by an enlightened colonial power. In spite of a two-year long hiatus of ‘Emergency Rule,’ few third world countries can make such a proud claim. Of those that can, such as Sri Lanka, none have the extraordinary size or social complexity of India.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 173 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, Hayward R. Jr, 1974. A Typology of Ecological Fallacies. In Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein, eds. Social Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Allardt, Erik. 1974. Aggregate Analysis: The Problem of Its Informative Value. In Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein, eds. Social Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kristi. 1979. Generation, Partisan Shift, and Realignment: A Glance Back to the New Deal. In Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney and Petrocik, John R.. The Changing American Voter (enlarged edition). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr, 1964. Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr, 1982. Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bourke, Paul F. and Donald, A. DeBats 1980. Individuals and Aggregates: A Note on Historical Data and Assumptions. Social Science History 4: 229–50.Google Scholar
Boyd, Lawrence H. Jr and Iversen, Gudmund R. 1979. Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R. 1968. Coalition Politics in North India. American Political Science Review 62: 1174–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1969. Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies 2: 139–71.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel J. and Ahmed, Bashiruddin. 1978. Citizens and Politics: Mass Political Behavior in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davey, Hampton. 1972. Polarization and Concensus in Indian Party Politics. Asian Survey 12: 701–16.Google Scholar
Graves, Daniel R. 1978. Elections and National Mobilization in India. Comparative Political Studies II: 255–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Leo A. 1959. Some Alternatives to Ecological Correlation. American Journal of Sociology 64: 610–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Harold A. 1980. The Second Coming: The 1980 Elections in India's Hindi Belt. Asian Survey 20: 595–616.Google Scholar
Hanusheck, Eric A., Jackson, J. E. and Kain, J. F. 1974. Model Specification, Use of Aggregate Data, and the Ecological Correlation Fallacy. Political Methodology I: 87–106.Google Scholar
Higenbotham, Stanley J. 1971. The 1971 Revolution in Indian Voting Behavior. Asian Survey 11: 1133–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. Stanley 1964. The Presidential Election of 1896. Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr, 1955. A Theory of Critical Elections. Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.Google Scholar
Kothari, Rajni. 1970. Politics in India. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
MacRae, Duncan Jr and Meldrum, James A. 1969. Factor Analysis of Aggregate Voting Statistics. In Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein, eds. Social Ecology, Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John L. and Tukey, John W. 1978. Explanatory Analysis of Aggregate Voting Behavior: Presidential Elections in New Hampshire, 1896–1972. Social Science History 2: 292–331.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Oliver. 1978. The Collapse of the Indian National Congress. Pacific Affairs 51: 41–65.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Sudhansu Bhusan. 1976. The Age Distribution of the Indian Population. Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
Population of India. 1982. Country Monograph Series Number 10, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ST/ESCAP/220). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert S. 1979. Votes, Seats, and the Critical Indian Election of 1967. The Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 17: 247–63.Google Scholar
Robinson, William S. 1950. Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review 15: 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Lloyd I. 1971. Continuities and Change in Electoral Behavior: The 1971 Parliamentary Election in India. Asian Survey 11: 1119–32.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Lloyd I. and Susanne, H. 1981. Transformation of Congress Party: Why 1980 Was Not a Restoration. Economic and Political Weekly 16: 811–18.Google Scholar
Shively, Phillips W.. 1969. ‘Ecological’ Inference: The Use of Aggregate Data to Study Individuals. American Political Science Review 63: 1183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, Phillips W.. 1974. Utilizing External Evidence in Cross-level Inference. Political Methodology 4: 61–73.Google Scholar
Singh, V. B. and Bose, Shankar. 1984. Elections in India: Data Handbook on Lok Sabha Elections, 1952–1980. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1969. Ecological Regression as a Game with Nature. In Bernd, J.L., ed. Mathematical Applications in Political Science, IV. Charlottesville, Va.: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James Q. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States (revised edition). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Veg, O. P. 1976. India's Population. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, Pvt., Ltd.Google Scholar
Wanat, John. 1979. The Application of a Non-Analytic, Most Possible Estimation Technique: The Relative Impact of Mobilization and Conversion of Votes in the New Deal. Political Methodology 6: 357–74.Google Scholar
Wanat, John and Burke, Karen. 1982. Estimating the Degree of Mobilization and Conversion in the 1980s: An Inquiry into the Nature of Electoral Change. American Political Science Review 76: 360–70.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1978. India at the Polls: The Parliamentary Elections of 1977. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1982. Congress Restored: Continuities and Discontinuities in Indian Politics. Asian Survey 22: 339–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar