Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:54:28.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Communal Award of 1932 and its Implications in Bengal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Bidyut Chakrabarty
Bidyut Chakrabarty
Affiliation:
G. B. Pant Social Science Institute, Allahabad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The debate over the separate and joint electorates as rival modes of election to the various representative institutions by the British began with the Simla deputation of 1906 and remained controversial until 1947. Not only was the issue controversial in pre-Independent India, but it also raises debates among contemporary historians and political scientists. For John Gallagher, the Communal Award was nothing but ‘a sign of [the] determination [of the British Government] to warp the Indian question towards electoral politics’. While looking into the operational aspect of the Award, Anil Seal, too, has affirmed that ‘by extending the electorate, the imperial croupier had summoned more players to his table’. Looking at the Award from the British point of view, both of them thus arrived at the same conclusions: (a) the Award introduced the native politicians to the sophisticated world of parliamentary politics; and (b) as a result of the new arrangement, as stipulated in the 1935 Act, politics now percolated down to the localities. The available evidence, however, does reveal that the Award and the constitutional rights guaranteed to Indians under the Act were the price the British paid for the continuity of the Indian Empire. What thus appears to be a calculated generous gesture was very much a political expedient. The surrender of power into Indian hands, though at the regional levels, was not welcomed by some senior officers who saw an eclipse of British authority in this endeavour.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 493 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gallagher, J., ‘Congress in Decline, Bengal, 1900–39, Modern Asian Studies (hereafter MAS), 7, 3 (1973), p. 615.Google Scholar

2 Anil Seal, ‘Imperialism and Nationalism in India’, ibid., p. 343.

3 West Bengal State Archives (hereafter WBSA), Home-Pol, 689 (1–3)/1933, Note on the report of Commissioners' conference, 1933, by the Commissioner of Chittagong, no date.Google Scholar

4 National Archives of India (hereafter NAI), Home-Poll 41/1/1932, Note to Commissioners and Collectors by the Government of India, no date.Google Scholar

5 IOR, L/Po/46(ii), The Prime Minister, Ramsay Macdonald, was quoted in the memorandum submitted by the Secretary of State to the Cabinet Policy Committee, 11/3/1932.Google Scholar

6 IOR, L/PO/78(i), PM's statement for release on the afternoon of Tuesday, 16 August, in time for publication in the morning newspapers in India and UK of Wednesday 17 August 1932.

7 Ibid.

8 IOR, L/PO/49(ii), Lothian to the Viceroy, 8/8/1932.Google Scholar

9 IOR, CMD 2360, vol. XVI, Memorandum by Ghuznavi, A. K., p. 188.Google Scholar

10 IOR, L/PO/48(ii), Muslim demands including 14 points of Jinnah were placed at the open meeting of the All India Muslim League at Delhi in March 1929.

11 Ibid., memorandum to Samuel Hoare, Secretary of State by Aga Khan, enclosed with the letter of 2/3/1932.

12 Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (hereafter NMML) AICC, 2/1928, Subhas to Motilal, 12/7/1928.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.

14 Azizul, Haque, A Plea for Separate Electorate in Bengal (Calcutta, 1931).Google Scholar

15 Ibid., pp. 10–14.

16 The entire discussion is based on Azizul Haque, ibid., pp. 6–11.

17 All Parties Conference, 1928, p. 48.Google Scholar

18 Azizul, Haque, A plea, p. 11.Google Scholar

19 Star of India, 19/12/33.

20 NMML, Hindu Mahasabha Papers (hereafter HMP), Madan, Mohan Malaviya to Amar Nath Majumdar, 18/2/1934.Google Scholar

21 Subhas, Bose, The Indian Struggle (London, 1935) (hereafter IS), pp. 290–1.Google Scholar

22 IOR, L/PO/78(i), Tgm from the Secretary of State to the Viceroy, 8/9/1923. It is believed that the secret letter of B. R. Ambedkar to Aga Khan of 17/4/1932 influenced the PM's decision to a large extent. Ambedkar wrote: ‘the depressed classes have in your Highness their best friend and staunchest supporters of their claims and I have no doubt that your Highness will exercise all [his] influence with Sir Samuel Hoare and the Prime Minister in favour of decision which will do justice to them’. See IOR, L/PO/48(i), Ambedkar to Aga Khan, 17/4/1932.Google Scholar

23 Ibid., Gandhi to Macdonald, 9/9/1932.

24 Ibid., Prime Minister to Gandhi, 8/9/1932.

25 IOR, L/PO/78(ii), Poona Pact, 1932.Google Scholar

26 IOR, L/PO/48, Secret Cabinet minute, C. I. 32(2), 11/3/1932.Google Scholar

27 IOR, L/PO/49(iii), Bengal Governor to Viceroy, 5/5/1932.Google Scholar

28 IOR, L/PO/49(ii), Tgm, Bengal Governor to Samuel Hoare, 7/6/1932.Google Scholar

29 David, Page, Prelude to Partition (OUP, Delhi, 1982), p. 256.Google Scholar

30 IOR, L/PO/49(ii), Tgm, Viceroy (Willingdon) to Samuel Hoare, 14/6/1932.Google Scholar

31 IOR, Templewood Collection, Eur 240/5, Willingdon to Hoare, 10/7/1932.Google Scholar

32 IOR, L/PO/49(i), Tgm, Governor to Viceroy, 20/7/1932.Google Scholar

33 Ibid.

34 IOR, L/PO/49(i), Tgm, Bengal Governor to Viceroy, 29/7/1932.Google Scholar

35 Ibid.

36 IOR, L/PO/49(ii), PM to S. Hoare, 21/7/1932.Google Scholar

37 Benthall Papers, CSASC, suggested solution to the communal question in Bengal by Benthall, 21/1/1931.Google Scholar

38 Ibid.

39 IOR, L/PO/48(i), memorandum presented by Samuel Hoare to the Cabinet Committee, India Round Table Conference, (printed), 9/11/1931.Google Scholar

40 IOR, L/PO49(i) Tgm, Governor to Viceroy, 26/7/1932.Google Scholar

41 Benthall Papers, Diary Notes, 28/8/1932.Google Scholar

42 IOR, L/PO/49(iii), A brief analysis of the Indian Franchise Committee Report with a few criticisms by the Hon'ble Alhedy Sir Abdul Karim Ghuznavi, member, Bengal Government.Google Scholar

43 Ibid.

44 NAI, Home-Poll 41/4/1932, Tgm, Bengal Governor to Viceroy, 25/8/1932.Google Scholar

45 Ibid.

46 Haq's, A. K. Fazlul speech in the special session of the All India Muslim League, Calcutta, 1938,Google ScholarSharifuddin, Syed Pirzada (ed.), Foundations of Pakistan, All India Muslim League Documents, 1906–47, vol. II (Karachi, 1970), p. 286.Google Scholar

47 Mansur, Ahmad Abul, Amar Dekha Rajnitir Panchas Bachhar (Dhaka, Nowroze Kitabistan, 1970), p. 83.Google Scholar

48 NAI, Home-Poll 41/4/1932, Garbett, C. C. to Viceroy, 24/9/1932.Google Scholar

49 IOR, L/PJ/7/305, Ahmad, R. to Secretary of State, 9/4/1932.Google Scholar

50 Pirzada, Foundations of Pakistan, p. 203.Google Scholar

51 Indian Annual Register (hereafter IAR), vol. I, 1935, Presidential Address, p. 326.Google Scholar

52 Ibid., resolution no. 1.

53 IOR, L/PO/49(ii) A further note by Mitter, P. C. on the Indian Franchise Committee report, 8/6/1932.Google Scholar

54 Ibid.

55 NAI, Home-Poll, 41/4/1932, resolutions of the meeting at Town Hall, 4/9/1932.Google Scholar

56 Ibid., Gilchrist to Viceroy, 16/6/1932.

57 NMML, M. S. Aney Papers, draft report of the Committee of Unity Conference, Allahabad, 3–17 November, 1932.Google Scholar

58 Ibid., note by Malaviya, 4/11/1932.

59 Azad, editorial, 19/11/1932.Google Scholar

60 Cited in appendix Chakravarti, A. D. and Bhattacharyya, C. (eds), Congress Policy on Communal Award, Congress Nationalist Party, Bengal, 08, 1939, p. 125 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

61 Aney Papers, Gandhi to Aney, 12/7/1934.Google Scholar

62 See appendix A in Chakravarti and Bhattacharyya, Congress policy, p. 127.Google Scholar

63 AICC, G24/1934–1936, Resolutions adopted in the Anti-Communal Award Conference, Bombay, 25/10/1934.Google Scholar

64 Ibid.

65 AICC, G24/1934–1936, Tgms from, Barisal, Chittagong, 7/9/1934, Mymensingh, Birbhum, Hili and Khulna 8/9/1934; see also, G23–24/34–36, Tgms from Noakhali, Dacca 24/8/1934 and Pabna 27/8/1934.Google Scholar

66 AICC, G24/1934–1936, Satish Mishra to the Working Committee, 26/8/1934.Google Scholar

67 Ibid., Nisith Nath Kundu, Vice President, Dinajpur DCC to Patel, 4/9/1934.

68 NMML, B. C. Roy Papers, Roy, B. C. to Gandhi 22/8/1934 and Gandhi's reply 30/8/1934.Google Scholar

69 IOR, L/PO/78(ii), extract from a private letter from Willingdon to Samuel Hoare, 15/1/1933.Google Scholar

70 IAR, vol. I, 1934, Manifesto issued by representative Hindus of Bengal, Calcutta, 7/1/34, p. 303.Google Scholar

71 NMML, B. C. Roy Papers, Roy to Patel, 7/9/1934.Google Scholar

72 NAI, RPP, I/35, AICC report, Allahabad, February 28, 1935, The Congress and the Communal Award.Google Scholar

73 IAR, vol. II, 1934, p. 319.Google Scholar

74 AICC, G65/37, Diary notes, Prasad, 28/2/1935.Google Scholar

75 Ibid.,

notes of conversation held between Jinnah, M. A. and Babu Rajendra Prasad on 28 January, 1935 at Asoka Road, New Delhi, between 2.30 and 4.30.Google Scholar

76 Ibid., notes of conversation held on 31 January, 1935.

77 Ibid.

78 Ibid., notes of the conversation between Malaviya on the one side and Patel, Bhulabhai Desai and Prasad on the other, 31/1/35.

79 Ibid., notes of conversation between Jinnah and Prasad, 13, 14/2/1935.

80 RPP, III/35, Tgm, Narayan, Sen Indra to Prasad, 15/2/1935.Google Scholar

81 Ibid., Reddy to Prasad, 17/2/1935.

82 RRP, IV/1935, daily notes, Prasad, 20/2/1935.Google Scholar

83 IAR, vol. I, 1935, p. 314(a).Google Scholar

84 Ibid., p. 325.

85 IAR, vol. I, 1935, p. 328.Google Scholar

86 Ibid.

87 RPP, IV/35, Joint Statement of Prasad and Jinnah, 1/3/1935.Google Scholar

88 IOR, L/PO/49(ii), The communal settlement report by Lothian, 18/7/1932.Google Scholar

89 Nehru, J., An Autobiography (London, 1941), p. 576.Google Scholar

90 Gandhi, was quoted in The Modern Review, vol. LXVII, no. 3 (03 1940), p. 362.Google Scholar

91 Liberty, 18/8/1932.Google Scholar

92 Advance, 18/2/1932.Google Scholar

93 Amrita Bazar Patrika (hereafter ABP), 23/9/1933.Google Scholar

94 RPP, IV/36, Roy, K. S. to Nehru, 6/8/1936.Google Scholar

95 NMML, Ghosh, S. M., oral transcript, p. 305.Google Scholar

96 Bose to the Secretary, BPCC, 29/7/1935, in Chakravarty and Bhattacharyya, Congress Policy, p. 26.Google Scholar

97 HMP, C/8, Das, N. N. to Indra Narayan Sen, General Secretary, Congress Nationlist Party, Bengal, 24/8/1935.Google Scholar

98 ABP, 16/11/1936.Google Scholar

99 HMP, C/8, copy of the memorial signed by 126 individuals including retired District Magistrate, Editors of the newspapers, representative Hindu leaders, chairman of the municipalities, member of the Bengal Legislative Council.Google Scholar

100 Ibid.

101 Ibid.

102 Ibid., circular to the districts, signed by R. K. Mukherjee and T. C. Goswami, 5/6/1936.

103 Ibid., reply from the districts, 11/6, 13/6, 14/6/1935.

104 Ibid., anonymous letter to R. K. Mukherjee, 14/6/1936.

105 Ibid.

106 NMML, AICC, G24/1934–1936, Satis, Dasgupta to Nehru, 7/6/1936.Google Scholar

107 Azad, 18/6/1936.Google Scholar

108 IOR, L/PO/40, Ghuznavi to Mahatab, B. C., 17/12/1936.Google Scholar

109 Ibid.

110 Ibid.

111 IOR, L/PO/40, Mahatab to Ghuznavi, 18/12/1936.Google Scholar

112 NMML, B. C. Roy Papers, Mahatab to Roy, 18/12/1936.Google Scholar

113 Ibid., Roy to Mahatab, 22/12/1936.

114 IOR, L/PO/40, Zetland to Mahatab, 22/6/1936.Google Scholar

115 Ibid., Ghuznavi to Mahatab, 17/12/1936.

116 IOR, R/3/2/2 Bengal Governor to Linlithgow, 17/12/1936.Google Scholar

117 Ibid.

118 ibid.

119 Pirzada, (ed.), Foundations of Pakistan, vol. II, p. 194.Google Scholar

120 IOR, R/3/2/2, Bengal Governor to Viceroy, 3/12/1936.Google Scholar

121 Bose was reluctant to call it an ‘award’ to him it was ‘a lesser evil than the partition of Bengal’. Sharma, M. V., The Right Man in the Right Place, Subhas Bose (Lahore, 1938), p. 25.Google Scholar

122 Subhas, Bose, IS, p. 288.Google Scholar

123 Ibid., p. 289.

124 RPP, IV/36, Bose to Secretary, BPCC, 29/7/1935.Google Scholar

125 IAR, vol. I, 1935,Google ScholarAnsari's press statement, 21/5/1934, p. 296.Google Scholar

126 Chakravarti and Bhattacharyya, Congress Policy, p. 38.Google Scholar

127 RPP, IV/1935, Bose to the Secretary, BPCC, 29/7/1935.Google Scholar

128 Subhas, Bose, IS, p. 288.Google Scholar

129 Chakravarti and Bhattacharyya, Congress policy, p. 29.Google Scholar

130 AICC, 24/1936, Congress Election Manifesto.Google Scholar

131 Ibid.

132 Ibid.,

Roy, B. C. issued the Bengal Congress Manifesto, 1/10/1936.Google Scholar

133 Ibid., copy of the resolution adopted on 2/9/1936.

134 AICC, P6/Part I/1936, Nehru to BPCC Secretary, Chandra, Majumdar Suresh, 6/8/1936.Google Scholar

135 AICC, 24/1936, Nehru to Sarat Bose, 26/9/1936.Google Scholar

136 Ibid., Nehru to Jagat Narayan Lal, 30/9/1936.

137 Ibid., Sarat to Nehru, 19/9/1936.

138 AICC, G24/1936, Patel to Roy, B. C., 9/10/1936. The content of the letter was quoted in Charkravarti and Bhattacharyya, Congress policy, p. 15.Google Scholar

139 B. C.Roy Papers, resolution of the Parlimentary Committee, 8/11/1936.Google Scholar

140 AICC, P6/Part II/1936, Sarat to Nehru, 7/8/1936.Google Scholar

141 Ibid., Nehru to Sarat, 14 /8/1936.

142 Ibid., K. S. Roy to Nehru, 6/8/1936.

143 AICC, 24/1936, Nehru to Sarat 4/10/1936.Google Scholar

144 B. C. Roy Papers, File no. 39, Nationalist Party circular, ‘Nationalist Party's attitude, BPCC and the Award: basis for collaboration’, 22/11/1936.Google Scholar

145 Chakravarti and Bhattacharyya, Congress policy, p. 15.Google Scholar

146 AICC, E7/1/Part I/1937,Google Scholar excerpts from the Kaiser-i-Hind, Bombay, 6/6/1937.Google Scholar

147 IOR, R/3/2/2, Bengal Governor to Linlithgow, 6/3/1937.Google Scholar

148 Ibid., Bengal Governor to Linlithgow, 3/12/1936.

149 Ibid.

150 Ibid.

151 Ibid.

152 NAI, F120/33, Qualification of electors: (a) payment of not less than 6 annas chaukidari tax or 8 annas Municipal tax or fee; (b) having passed the matriculation or the school leaving certificate or an examination accepted by local government as equivalent; (c) being a wife of a person possessing the property qualification at present but will be on the roll during widowhood or until remarriage when she will cease to be qualified in respect of her late husband; (d) assessment of income tax; (e) being a retired, pensioned or discharged officer, non-commercial officer or soldier of His Majesty's regular forces.Google Scholar

153 IOR, CMD 5589, vol. XXI, 1937, election results, p. 212.Google Scholar