No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2020
The sociologist Edward Shils (1910–95) is a neglected commentator on modern India. Best known in a South Asian context for his involvement in the Congress for Cultural Freedom, Shils also produced an influential study on Indian intellectuals, published in 1961. He was one of the few non-Marxists to write about the role of intellectuals during the era of decolonization in Asia and Africa. His book appeared in the same year as Frantz Fanon's Les Damnés de la Terre (1961) and a year before C. L. R. James's Marxism and the Intellectuals (1962), just as Pan-Africanism was finding its ideological voice. This article recovers Shils’ work on the Indian intellectual. It describes his Indian interlocutors, his methodology, and his claims about the isolated and ineffectual character of the Indian academic elite. The article concludes with an examination of the longer-term influence and validity of Shils’ critique of the Indian intelligentsia.
I am grateful to the David Bruce Centre, Keele University, for funding my research and to the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.
1 Fanon's work was translated into English two years later: Fanon, F., The wretched of the earth (London: MacGibbon and Kee, 1963)Google Scholar. Johnson, C. R. (pseud.) [James, C. L. R.], Marxism and the intellectuals (Detroit: Facing Reality Publishing, 1963)Google Scholar. On Pan-Africanism, see: James, Leslie, George Padmore and decolonization from below: Pan-Africanism, the Cold War, and the end of empire (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Shils, E., The intellectual between tradition and modernity: the Indian situation (The Hague: Mouton, 1961)Google Scholar.
3 Shils, E. and Young, M., ‘The meaning of the coronation’, Sociological Review, n.s., vol. 1, no. 2 (1953), pp. 63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Shils, E., The torment of secrecy: the background and consequences of American security policies (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1956)Google Scholar.
5 For example, Susan Hoeber Rudolph and Lloyd I. Rudolph offered the following description in 1993: ‘Edward Shils: sociologist, Weber translator, conservative theorist’: S. Rudolph and L. Rudolph, ‘Remembering Raman’, Times of India, 25 July 1993, p. 13. For a recent reassessment of Shils (albeit one that does not look at his work on India), see: Adair-Toteff, C. and Turner, S. (eds), The calling of social thought: rediscovering the work of Edward Shils (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019)Google Scholar, esp. Jefferson Pooley's chapter. See also: Collini, Stefan, Absent minds. Intellectuals in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 145–149Google Scholar.
6 E. Shils, ‘Tradition and liberty: antinomy and interdependence’ (typescript), ‘The Future of Freedom Conference’, Milan, 12–17 September 1955, ‘Congress for Cultural Freedom’, Folder 406, Box 65, Series 100, Rockefeller Foundation records, General Correspondence, RG2, 1952–1957, Rockefeller Archive Center, Sleepy Hollow, New York (hereafter Rockefeller Archive Center).
7 Shils, E., ‘Political development in the new states’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 2, no. 3 (1960), pp. 265–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar2, at p. 267.
8 Gilman, N., Mandarins of the future: modernisation theory in Cold War America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkin University Press, 2004), pp. 1–3Google Scholar.
9 Berger, Mark T., The battle for Asia: from decolonization to globalization (Asia's transformations) (London: Routledge, 2004), Chapter 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Engerman, David C., The price of aid: the economic Cold War in India (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Capra, F., The name above the title: an autobiography (New York: Macmillan, 1971), p. 437Google Scholar.
11 Thapar, R., All these years: a memoir (Delhi: Seminar Publications, 1991), p. 154Google Scholar.
12 See: Rowan, C., The pitiful and the proud (New York: Random House, 1956)Google Scholar; Redding, J. Saunders, An American in India (Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1954)Google Scholar.
13 Memorandum 1, 8 May 1959, University of Chicago Committee for the Comparative Study of New Nations Records, 1958–1975, File 13, Box 2, Special Collections Research Centre, University of Chicago.
14 Simpson, John A., ‘A personal note’, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 37, no. 1 (1981), pp. 26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 28.
15 Chadbourne Gilpatric, ‘Diary of South Asia Trip January–March 1956’, 20–23 February 1956, Folder 397A, Box 60, Series 460, Rockefeller Foundation records, General Correspondence, RG2, 1952–1957, Rockefeller Archive Center. On the CCF in India, see: McGarr, Paul, ‘“Quiet Americans in India”: the CIA and the politics of intelligence in Cold War South Asia’, Diplomatic History, vol. 38, no. 5 (2014), pp. 1046–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pullin, Eric, ‘“Money does not make any difference to the opinions that we hold”: India, the CIA, and the Congress for Cultural Freedom, 1951–58’, Intelligence and National Security, vol. 26 (2011), pp. 377–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Herbert Passin to Edward Shils, 4 November 1957, International Association of Cultural Freedom Papers, File 13, Box 290, Special Collections Research Centre, University of Chicago.
17 John C. Hunt to Edward Shils, 16 July 1959, International Association of Cultural Freedom Papers, File 14, Box 290, ibid.
18 John C. Hunt to Edward Shils, 13 October 1961, International Association of Cultural Freedom Papers, File 4, Box 291, ibid.
19 E. Shils, ‘Confidential note, ‘Further thoughts on the Congress in the ’60s, for information of the members of the Executive Committee and International Council only’, March 1962, International Association of Cultural Freedom Papers, File 7a, Box 291, ibid.
20 ‘Intervention concernant le rapport de M. Shils’, International Association of Cultural Freedom Committee Executive meeting, Zurich, 10–11/Mars 1962, p. 4, International Association of Cultural Freedom Papers, File 7a, Box 291, ibid.
21 Nicolas Nabokov, ‘Report on trip to India’, 8 November–21 December 1956, Folder 406, Box 65, Series 100, Rockefeller Foundation records, General Correspondence, RG2, 1952–1957; Folder 514, Box 78, Series 100, Rockefeller Foundation records, General Correspondence, RG2, 1952–1957, both Rockefeller Archive Center.
22 Shils, E., A fragment of a sociological autobiography: the history of my pursuit of a few ideas (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2006), p. 103Google Scholar.
23 Edward Shils to Milton Singer, 11 March 1965, Milton Singer Papers, File 28/3, Special Collections Research Centre, University of Chicago.
24 Scott-Smith, G., ‘The Congress for Cultural Freedom, the end of ideology and the 1955 Milan conference: defining the parameters of discourse’, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 37, no. 3 (2002), pp. 437–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Shils, A fragment of a sociological autobiography, p. 123.
26 Ibid.
27 Memorandum (n. d. 1965), Milton Singer Papers, File 28/3, Special Collections Research Centre, University of Chicago.
28 Shils, E., ‘Introduction’, in his Centre and periphery: essays in macrosociology. (Selected papers of Edward Shils 2) (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1975), p. xiGoogle Scholar.
29 Shils, E., ‘The confluence of sociological traditions’, in his The calling of sociology and other essays on the pursuit of learning. (Selected papers of Edward Shils 3) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), p. 160Google Scholar.
30 Chadbourne Gilpatric, ‘Diary of South Asia Trip January–March 1956’, Rockefeller Archive Center.
31 Shils, The intellectual between tradition and modernity, p. 18.
32 Ibid., p. 46.
33 Shils, E., ‘The culture of the Indian intellectual’, The Sewanee Review, vol. 67, no. 2 (1959), pp. 239–261Google Scholar; Shils, E., ‘The culture of the Indian intellectual’, The Sewanee Review, vol. 67, no. 3 (1959), pp. 401–421Google Scholar.
34 Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincialising Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.
35 Shils, The intellectual between tradition and modernity, p. 78.
36 Shils, A fragment of a sociological autobiography, p. 113.
37 Shils, The intellectual between tradition and modernity, p. 79.
38 Ibid., p. 86.
39 Natesan, B., Books that have influenced me: a symposium (Madras: G. A. Natesan and Co., 1947)Google Scholar.
40 Shils, The intellectual between tradition and modernity, p. 82. For the background, see: Choudhry, Sujit, ‘Language’, in Choudhry, Sujit et al. (eds), The Oxford handbook of the Indian constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 180–183Google Scholar.
41 Shils, The intellectual between tradition and modernity, p. 87.
42 Ibid., p. 27.
43 Ibid., p. 63.
44 Ibid., p. 70.
45 Ibid.
46 For this criticism of Mannheim, see: Shils, A fragment of a sociological autobiography, pp. 33–37.
47 Ibid., p. 69.
48 Ibid., p. 64.
49 Shils, E., ‘Indian students, rather Sadhus than Philistines’, Encounter, vol. 17, no. 3 (September 1961), pp. 12–20Google Scholar, at p. 16.
50 Ibid., p. 18.
51 Ibid., p. 19.
52 Ibid., p. 20.
53 Shils, The intellectual between tradition and modernity, p. 71.
54 Ibid., p. 102.
55 Ibid., p. 115.
56 N. J. N., ‘Sunday soliloquies’, The Times of India, 17 February 1963, p. 8; Sena, V., ‘Discussion: the dilemmas of the Indian intellectual, a counter-statement’, Quest, vol. 26 (1960), pp. 73–83Google Scholar, at p. 83.
57 R. Gupta, ‘Books’, Seminar, vol. 44 (April 1963), p. 38; cf. M. Rao, ‘Institutional failure’, ibid., p. 21; Kusum Madgarkar, ‘Review’, Seminar, vol. 92 (April 1967), p. 37.
58 Béteille, André, Ideologies and intellectuals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980)Google Scholar.
59 Rudolph and Rudolph, ‘Remembering Raman’.
60 For this criticism of Shils, see: Marriott, McKim, ‘Constructing an Indian ethnosociology’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 23, no. 1 (1989), pp. 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
61 Nehru, ‘Asia and Africa awake’, Speech at the Concluding Session of the Asian-African Conference at Bandung, Indonesia, 24 April 1955, in Jawaharlal Nehru's speeches, Vol. 3: March 1953–August 1957 (Delhi: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 1958), pp. 288–291.
62 Singh, A. K., ‘The impact of foreign study: the Indian experience’, Minerva, vol. 1, no. 1 (1962), pp. 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 47; Irene Gilbert, ‘The Indian academic profession: the origins of a tradition of subordination’, ibid., vol. 10, no. 3 (1972), pp. 384–411.
63 Srivastava, H. C., Intellectuals in contemporary India (New Delhi: Heritage, 1977)Google Scholar; Panikkar, K. N., Culture, ideology, hegemony: intellectuals and social consciousness in colonial India (New Delhi: Tuloka, 1995)Google Scholar; Altbach, Philip, ‘The distorted guru’ (1979), in Agarwal, Pawan (ed.), A half-century of Indian higher education: essays by Philip G. Altbach (Los Angeles: Sage, 2012), pp. 125–159Google Scholar; Choudhary, Kameshwar, Intellectuals and society: a study of teachers in India (Mumbai: Popular Prakashan, 2004)Google Scholar.
64 Report of the Visiting Committee to the JNU, 1–2 February 1972, Appendix; 46–48th Inter-University Board Annual Meeting, 1971–3, Proceedings (New Delhi: Inter-University Board of India and Ceylon, 1973), p. 49. For the JNU, see: Batabyal, R., JNU: the making of a university (Delhi: Harper Collins, 2014)Google Scholar; Sharma, Shalini and Datta, Rajat, ‘Jawaharlal Nehru University: a university for the nation’, in Pellew, Jill and Taylor, Miles (eds), Utopian universities: a global history of the new campuses of the 1960s (London: Bloomsbury, 2020)Google Scholar.
65 ‘Question no. 1 (Lok Sabha) by Shri George Fernandes Regarding Activities of CIA’, 20 March 1967, Ministry of External Affairs, File WII/125/67/Pt I, National Archives of India.
66 For the fall-out in India after the revelations, see: K. K. Singh to A. B. Shah, 6 June 1967, International Association of Cultural Freedom Papers, File 351/5, Special Collections Research Centre, University of Chicago; Jayaprakash Narayan to Raymond Aron, 22 June 1967, Congress for Cultural Freedom Correspondence, Jayaprakash Narayan Papers, Nehru Memorial Museum, New Delhi; Minoo Masani to Jayaprakash Narayan, 25 July 1967, ibid.
67 E. Shils, ‘The invitation to Caesar’, Minerva, vol. 10, no. 4 (1972), pp. 513–519.
68 E. Shils, ‘The legitimacy of social inquiry’, in his The calling of sociology, p. 487.
69 Ludden, David, ‘Introduction: a brief history of subalternity’, in Ludden, D. (ed.), Subaltern studies. Critical history, contested meaning and the globalisation of South Asia (London: Anthem Press, 2002), pp. 1–42Google Scholar.
70 Shils, E. and Coleman, P., ‘Remembering the Congress for Cultural Freedom’, Society, vol. 46, no. 5 (2009), pp. 437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For these shifts, see: Rudolph, Lloyd and Rudolph, Susanne, The modernity of tradition: political development in India (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967)Google Scholar; Appadurai, Arjun, ‘Knowledge, circulation and collective biography’, in Assayag, Jackie and Bénéï, Véronique (eds), At home in diaspora: South Asian scholars and the West (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003), pp. 28–43Google Scholar.
71 Davis, Richard H., South Asia at Chicago: a history (Chicago: Committee on South Asian Studies, 1985)Google Scholar; Sackley, Nicole, ‘Cosmopolitanism and the uses of tradition: Robert Redfield and alternative visions of modernisation during the Cold War’, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 9, no. 3 (2012), pp. 565–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
72 Bourdieu, Pierre, Homo academicus (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.
73 Nandy, Ashis, The intimate enemy: loss and recovery of self under colonialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.
74 Subramanian, Narendra, ‘Populism in India’, SAIS Review of International Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1 (2007), pp. 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jaffrelot, Christophe and Tillin, Louise, ‘Populism in India’, in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira et al. (eds), The Oxford handbook of populism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 179–194Google Scholar.