No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2021
Since 2011 renewed fighting between the Myanmar military and the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) has triggered the internal displacement of more than 100,000 people in Kachin state. This article examines how care practices and care ethics influence border governance in the context of humanitarian concerns in Kachin state in northern Myanmar, which shares a border with China. The situation in Kachin state at the China-Myanmar border reveals the contrasting territorial logics at stake, the contingency of governance at a time of political transition, and distinct ‘regimes of care’, as manifested through humanitarian relief, which all contribute towards border governance. Drawing on ethnographic research and interviews, the article highlights how care deficits are met by a separatist government, community organizations (both faith-based and secular), and diaspora populations which mobilize a range of networks and resources—forming webs of connections and interfacing with one another—to provide humanitarian relief. However, their actions and the ensuing flows of care could produce or deepen political subjectivities that are geared towards territorial contestation and separatism, thus changing expressions of border governance. The article further observes that the Kachin situation has wider implications for the peace negotiations taking place at the national level in Myanmar.
Acknowledgements: I am grateful to the MAS reviewers for their constructive comments. This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (Award no. FY2016-FRC3-011).
1 Phyo Tha Kyaw, ‘Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's Jade Necklace at Peace Dinner Raises Questions’, The Irrawaddy, published online on 25 May 2017, available at https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/daw-aung-san-suu-kyis-jade-necklace-at-peace-dinner-raises-questions.html, [accessed 4 December 2020].
2 Global Witness, ‘Jade: Myanmar's Big State Secret’, published online on 23 October 2017, available at https://www.globalwitness.org/documents/18112/Jade_full_report_online_hi_res_twEcXTO.pdf, [accessed 4 December 2020].
3 Miriam Ticktin, Casualties of Care: Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2011).
4 Walker, Margath and Winton, Ailsa, ‘Towards a theory of the discordant border’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, vol. 38, no. 2, 2017, pp. 245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Anonymized reference, 2018, p. 408.
6 Pallister-Wilkins, Polly, ‘Humanitarian borderwork’, in Border Politics: Defining Spaces of Governance and Forms of Transgressions, (eds) Günay, C. and Witjes, N. (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017), pp. 84–103Google Scholar.
7 Walker and Winton, ‘Towards a theory of the discordant border’, p. 254.
8 Ibid., p. 252.
9 Ibid., p. 253.
10 Anonymized reference, 2018.
11 See Anderson, Ben, Kearnes, Matthew, McFarlene, Colin and Swanton, Dan, ‘On assemblages and geography’, Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 2, no. 2, 2012, pp. 171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 See Raghuram, Parvati, ‘Locating care ethics beyond the global North’, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, vol. 15, no. 3, 2016, pp. 511–533Google Scholar.
13 Aldelman, Howard, ‘From refugee to forced migration: The UNHCR and human security’, International Migration Review, vol. 35, no. 1, 2001, pp. 7–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barnett, M., ‘Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow’, International Migration, vol. 35, no. 1, 2001, pp. 244–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chimni, B. S., ‘Globalization, humanitarianism and the erosion of refugee protection’, Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 13, issue 3, 2000, pp. 243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Pallister-Wilkins, ‘Humanitarian borderwork’, p. 89.
15 Horstmann, Alexander, ‘Ethical dilemmas and identifications of faith-based humanitarian organizations in the Karen refugee crisis’, Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 24, issue 3, 2011, pp. 513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nah, A. M., ‘Networks and norm entrepreneurship amongst local civil society actors: Advancing refugee protection in the Asia Pacific region’, The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 20, issue 2, 2016, pp. 223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 McNevin, Anne and Missbach, Antje, ‘Hospitality as a horizon of aspiration (or, what the international refugee regime can learn from Acehnese fishermen)’, Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 31, issue 3, 2018, pp. 292–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fechter, Anne-Meike, ‘Brokering transnational flows of care: The case of citizen aid’, Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, vol. 82, no. 2, 2020, pp. 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anonymized reference, 2017.
17 Baldassar, Loretta and Merla, Laura, Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care: Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life (New York: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar.
18 Ticktin, Casualties of Care, p. 11.
19 Gerard, Alison and Weber, Leanne, ‘“Humanitarian borderwork”: Identifying tensions between humanitarianism and securitization for government contracted NGOs working with adult and unaccompanied minor asylum seekers in Australia’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 23, 2019, pp. 266–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fechter, ‘Brokering transnational flows of care’, p. 306.
20 Johnson, Mark and Lindquist, Johan, ‘Care and control in Asian migrations’, Ethnos: A Journal of Anthropology, vol. 85, no. 2, 2020, pp. 195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Woods, Kevin, ‘The commercialisation of counterinsurgency: Battlefield enemies, business bedfellows in Kachin state, Burma’, in War and Peace in the Borderlands of Myanmar: The Kachin Ceasefire, 1994—2011, (ed.) Sadan, M. (Copenhagen: NIAS Press, 2016), pp. 114–145Google Scholar.
22 Laur Kiik, ‘Conspiracy, God's plan and national emergency: Kachin popular analyses of the ceasefire era and its resource grabs’, in ibid., pp. 205–235.
23 For an overview of Chinese policy on the border regions shared with Myanmar, see Han Enze, ‘Borderland ethnic politics and changing Sino-Myanmar relations’, in ibid., pp. 149–165.
24 Karin Dean, ‘Spaces, territorialities and ethnography on the Thai-, Sino- and Indo-Myanmar boundaries’, in The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies, (ed.) Doris Wastl-Walter (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 175–190; Anonymized reference, 2018, p. 415.
25 Malaysia and Thailand are also important sites where the Kachin diaspora have settled, but I did not carry out fieldwork in those sites due to practical constraints.
26 Kachin humanitarian worker, fieldwork interview by author, 2013.
27 Holmes, Robert A., ‘Burmese domestic policy: The politics of Burmanization’, Asian Survey, vol. 7, no. 3, 1967, pp. 188–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
28 Fieldwork interviews by author, 2013.
29 See also essays expressing similar sentiments about ceasefires in other parts of Myanmar by the authors in Sadan (ed.), War and Peace.
30 The UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (1998) is available at https://www.unhcr.org/uk/protection/idps/43ce1cff2/guiding-principles-internal-displacement.html, [accessed 7 December 2020].
31 Kingston, Lindsey N. and Datta, Saheli, ‘Strengthening the norms of global responsibility: Structural violence in relation to internal displacement and statelessness’, Global Responsibility to Protect, vol. 4, issue 4, 2012, pp. 475–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
32 Fieldwork interviews by author, 2013.
33 Kachin community leader, fieldwork interviews by author, 2015.
34 Fieldwork interviews by author, 2013.
35 Agamben, G., Homer Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (California: Stanford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar.
36 Kallio, Kirsi P., Häkli, Jouni and Pascucci, Elisa, ‘Refugeeness as political subjectivity: Experiencing the humanitarian border’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, vol. 37, no. 7, 2019, pp. 1258–1276Google Scholar.
37 Fieldwork interviews by author, 2013.
38 Anonymized reference, 2018, p. 418.
39 Pain, Rachel, ‘Intimate war’, Political Geography, vol. 44, 2015, pp. 64–73, p. 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
40 Anonymized reference, forthcoming.
41 Kiik, ‘Conspiracy, God's plan and national emergency’, p. 205.
42 Fieldwork interviews by author, 2013.
43 Fieldwork interview by author, 2017.
44 Ibid.
45 Anonymized reference, p. 85.
46 Williams, Jill, ‘From humanitarian exceptionalism to contingent care: Care and enforcement at the humanitarian border’, Political Geography, vol. 47, 2015, pp. 11–20, p. 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
47 Baldassar and Merla, Transnational Families.
48 Shain, Yossi, ‘The role of diasporas in conflict perpetuation or resolution’, SAIS Review, vol. 22, no. 2, 2002, pp. 115–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
49 Anonymized reference.
50 Fieldwork interview by author, 2015.
51 Mahkaw Hkun Sa, ‘The founding of the KNO and the development of an activist diaspora network’, in War and Peace, (ed.) Sadan, pp. 330–358.
52 Baldassar and Merla, Transnational Families, p. 8.
53 Kachin community leader, fieldwork interview by author, 2017.
54 Fieldwork interviews by author, 2017.
55 People's Tribunal of Myanmar, ‘Session on State Crimes Allegedly Committed in Myanmar against the Rohingyas, Kachins and Other Groups’, published online on 29 September 2017, available at https://tribunalonmyanmar.org/2017/10/31/judgment-of-the-peoples-tribunal-on-myanmar/, [accessed 4 December 2017].
56 Fieldwork interviews by author, Myanmar, 2017.
57 See Ticktin, Casualties of Care.
58 Kallio et al., ‘Refugeeness as political subjectivity’.