Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:55:18.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘At Least the Government is Watching out for us Now’: Dalit perceptions and experiences of governance and cash transfers in three villages in Sarlahi, Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2019

KRISTIE DRUCZA Open the ORCID record for KRISTIE DRUCZA [Opens in a new window]
KRISTIE DRUCZA*
Affiliation:
The Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides qualitative case studies and applies citizenship theory to reveal the way in which being in receipt of a cash transfer can help local poor and excluded Dalits to understand what it means to be a citizen of Nepal's state. Cash transfers can contribute to an individual's subjective sense of inclusion and citizenship. Although Dalits encounter disparities and rights abuses when dealing with local government over their cash transfer entitlements, their responses reveal a sense of agency in the positive way in which they interpret their entitlements. Although they may be mistreated at the local level, they feel valued because the central ‘state’ recognizes their plight and identity. Cash transfers are understood by Dalits through the lens of social exclusion, patronage, and the hierarchical society in which they live. They are an effective way of reaching large numbers of formerly excluded citizens and indicate that the state now includes them. As such, they can contribute towards building an inclusive state.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 2041 - 2078
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kabeer, N. (2009). Social Protection in South Asia: A Review, Centre for Social Protection, Institute of Development Studies, SussexGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid.

3 Fraser, N. (2003). Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation, Verso, London and New York, pp. 7–109, here pp. 49–50Google Scholar.

4 Kabeer, N. (2000). Social Exclusion, Poverty and Discrimination. Towards an Analytical Framework, IDS Bulletin 31(4), pp. 83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Peace, R. (2001). Social Exclusion: A Concept in Need of Definition?, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 16, pp. 17–36Google Scholar, here p. 31.

6 Hanlon, J., Barrientos, A. and Hulme, D. (2010). Just Give Money to the Poor, Kumarian Press, USA, p. 165Google Scholar.

7 Devereux, S. (2013). Trajectories of Social Protection in Africa, Development Southern Africa 30(1), pp. 13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here pp. 21–22; Farrington, J. and Slater, R. (2006). Introduction: Cash Transfers: Panacea for Poverty Reduction or Money Down the Drain?, Development Policy Review 24(5), pp. 499–511, doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2006.00344.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barrientos, A. and Holmes, R. (2007). Social Assistance in Developing Countries Database, Vol. 3, University of Sussex, SussexGoogle Scholar.

8 The low-caste ‘Untouchable’ social group.

9 The Adivasi Janajati movement is made up of numerous smaller ethnic-based organizations with different experiences of exclusion. Newars, who are the indigenous inhabitants of Kathmandu, have fared better than other Janajati groups and their condition is sometimes used to argue against declaring indigenous categories to be marginalized: see Gellner, D. (1986). Language, Caste, Religion and Territory: Newar Identity Ancient and Modern, European Journal of Sociology 27, pp. 102–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The Sherpas as a group are faring well economically, due to tourism-related economic opportunities. Meanwhile, other groups have been heavily subordinated, such as the Kamalari who were indentured labourers originating predominantly from the Tharu community. Some Newars are Buddhist, like other indigenous groups, but contrary to the Adivasi Janajati definition, others are Hindu and have their own internal caste system and language, which they would like recognized: see Hangen, S. (2007). Creating a ‘New Nepal’: The Ethnic Dimension, East-West Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar.

10 Kabeer, N. (2010). Can the MDGs Provide a Pathway to Social Justice? The Challenge of Intersecting Inequalities, United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar.

11 The Madhesh is a low-lying area of Nepal that borders North India. Madheshis share kinship ties and other features with people across the Indian border, and are excluded by the state of Nepal.

12 Drucza, K. (2017). The Politics behind Social Protection in Nepal, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 3(4), pp. 311–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Drucza, K. (2015). Social Protection Policymaking in Nepal, Journal of Social Research and Policy 6(2), pp. 33–56Google Scholar.

14 World Bank (2010). Nepal Public Expenditure Review, The World Bank, KathmanduGoogle Scholar.

15 Before 1991, low-caste and ethnic populations were fully excluded from Nepali politics and state institutions such as the bureaucracy. Ethnic/caste politics have evolved since post-1991 democracy: see Gellner, D., Pfaff-Czarnecka, J. and Whelpton, J. (1997). Nationalism and Ethnicity in a Hindu Kingdom: The Politics of Culture in Contemporary Nepal, Harwood Academic Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar; Drucza, K. (2016). Building a Socially Inclusive State: Federalism in Nepal, The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations: Annual Review 16, pp. 1–17, doi:10.18848/1447-9532/CGPCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 The Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities classified indigenous groups into five categories based on a set of socioeconomic indicators: ‘endangered’, ‘highly marginalized’, ‘marginalized’, ‘disadvantaged’, and ‘advantaged’. Endangered groups have small population sizes and poor human development indicators. More than 90 per cent of endangered and highly marginalized groups live in remote rural areas and rely on subsistence agriculture or hunting and gathering. For more information, see http://un.org.np/oneun/undaf/endangered, [accessed 4 March 2019].

17 Drucza, The Politics behind Social Protection; Drucza, Social Protection Policymaking, pp. 33–56.

18 Toffin, G. (2014). The Inclusive State: A Philosophy and Sociology of Social Inclusion. in Perspectives on Social Inclusion and Exclusion in Nepal, (eds) Gurung, O., Tamang, M. S. and Turin, M., Central Department of Sociology/Anthropology (CDSA), Tribhuvan University (TU), Kirtipur, Kathmandu, pp. 218–240Google Scholar, here p. 220.

19 Kohler, G., Marta, C. and Mariana, S. (2009). Rethinking Poverty and Social Exclusion Responses in Post-Conflict Nepal: Child-Sensitive Social Protection, Children, Youth and Environments 19(2), pp. 229–249Google Scholar; Jayasuriya, K. (2000). Capability, Freedom and the New Social Democracy, The Political Quarterly 71(3), pp. 282–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Carpenter, S., Slater, R. and Mallett, R. (2012). Social Protection and Basic Services in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations. ODI Working Paper 8; Lange, M. and Rueschemeyer, D. (2005). States and Development: Historical Antecedents of Stagnation and Advance, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, p. 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Farrington and Slater, Introduction, pp. 499–511.

21 Ellis, F. (2008). ‘We are All Poor Here’. Economic Difference, Social Divisiveness and Targeting Cash Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Paper presented at the Social Protection for the Poorest in Africa: Learning from Experience, 8–10 September, Kampala, Uganda.

22 Mauss, M. (2011). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar.

23 Ibid.

24 Blattman, C., Fiala, N. and Martinez, S. (2014). Generating Skilled Self-Employment in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from Uganda, Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(2), pp. 697–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Ferguson, J. (2015). Give a Man a Fish: Reflections on the New Politics of Distribution, Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Hickey, S. and Golooba-Mutebi, F. (2010). Governing Chronic Poverty under Inclusive Liberalism: The Case of the Northern Uganda Social Action Fund, Journal of Development Studies 46(7), pp. 1216–1239Google Scholar, here p. 1140; Hickey, S. (2011). The Politics of Social Protection: What do we Get from a ‘Social Contract’ Approach?, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Manchester, p. 431Google Scholar; Dagnino, E. (2005). ‘We All have Rights, but…’. Contesting Concepts of Citizenship in Brazil. in Inclusive Citizenship: Meanings and Expressions, (ed.) Kabeer, Naila, Zed Books, London and New York, pp. 149–163Google Scholar.

27 Upreti, B. R., Uprety, P., Hagen-Zanker, J., Sony, K. C. and Mallett, R. (2014). Surveying Livelihoods, Service Delivery and Governance: Baseline Evidence from Nepal. SLRC Working Paper.

28 World Bank (2011). Social Safety Nets in Nepal, The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar.

29 Oosterom, M. (2009). Fragility at the Local Level: Challenges to Building Local State–Citizen Relations in Fragile Settings. Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Working Paper.

30 OECD (2010). Do no Harm: International Support for State-Building, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar.

31 Darcy, J. (2004). Conflict and Social Protection: Social Protection in Situations of Violent Conflict and its Aftermath. DFID Social Protection Theme Papers; Holmes, R. (2011). The Role of Social Protection Programmes in Supporting Education in Conflict-Affected Situations, Prospects 41(2), pp. 223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here pp. 224–225; Carpenter, Slater and Mallett, Social Protection and Basic Services.

32 Gaventa, J., Barrett, G. and Benequista, N. (2010). Putting Citizens at the Centre: Linking States and Societies for Responsive Governance. A Policy-maker's Guide to the Research of the Development Research Centre on Citizenship, Participation and Accountability. Paper prepared for the conference on ‘The Politics of Poverty, Elites, Citizens and States’, 21–23 June 2010, Sunningdale, UK; Cornwall, A., Robins, S. and Von Lieres, B. (2011). States of Citizenship: Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement and Citizen Action. IDS Working Paper 364; Haider, H. (2011). State-Society Relations and Citizenship in Situations of Conflict and Fragility. Topic Guide Supplement, Governance and Social Development Resource Centre, International Development Department, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/con88.pdf, [accessed 5 March 2019].

33 Vij, N. (2011). Collaborative Governance: Analysing Social Audits in MGNREGA in India, IDS Bulletin 42(6), pp. 28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Hoddinott, J. F., Devereux, S., White, P., Klasen, S., Woolard, I., Alderman, H., Badiane, O., Ulimwengu, J. M. and Wouterse, F. S. (2012). Social Protection in West Africa: The Status Quo, Lessons from Other Regions, Implications for Research. WCAO Thematic Research Note, http://www.ifpri.org/publication/social-protection-west-africa, [accessed 5 March 2019].

35 Castillejo, C. (2009). Strengthening Women's Citizenship in the Context of State Building, Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE), MadridGoogle Scholar, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.357.8081&rep=rep1&type=pdf, [accessed 5 March 2019].

36 Ellis, F., Devereux, S. and White, P. (2009). Social Protection in Africa, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p. 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 MoFALD (2012). Operation Procedure of Social Security Program, 2069, Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development, KathmanduGoogle Scholar.

38 The week-long Hindu Dashain public holiday is traditionally a two-week festival followed approximately four weeks later by the five-day Hindu Tihar holiday. Nepalese frequently take a month off to travel back to their home village for these festivals.

39 New ERA (2013). Public Expenditure and Tracking Survey (PETS): Data Findings from PETS of Senior Citizens, Widows and Disability Social Security Entitlements in Selected Districts and VDCs in Nepal, Kathmandu, p. 20Google Scholar.

40 UNICEF (2014). Mid-line Survey on IYCF-Child Grant Program in Karnali Districts—Reduction of Child Malnutrition through Social Protection, United Nations Children Fund, Kathmandu, p. 67Google Scholar.

41 Ghost Entries Gobble up Social Security Funds, Republica, 27 July 2012.

42 Holmes, R. and Upadhya, S. (2009). The Role of Cash Transfers in Post-Conflict Nepal, Cash Transfers Series, Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar.

43 Uprety, L. (2010). A Final Report on the Effectiveness of Non-contributory Social Pension in Nepal, NEPAN and Help Age International, NepalGoogle Scholar.

44 Drucza, K. (2016). Talking about Inclusion: Attitudes and Affirmative Action in Nepal, Development Policy Review 35(2), pp. 161–195, doi:10.1111/dpr.12205CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Drucza, K. (2016). Building a Socially Inclusive State: Federalism in Nepal, The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations: Annual Review 16, 2016, pp. 1–17, doi:10.18848/1447-9532/CGPCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Drucza, K. (2017). Social Inclusion in the Post Conflict State of Nepal: Donor Practice and the Political Settlement, Journal of Global Social Policy 17(1), pp. 62–88, doi:10.1177/1468018116633559CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 McGregor, J., A. (2004). Researching Well-Being, Global Social Policy 4(3), pp. 337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 344.

46 Chopra, D., Willams, P. and Vira, B. (2011). Politics of Citizenship: Experience State-Society Relations from the Margins, Contemporary South Asia 19(2), pp. 243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ciotti, M. (2010). Retro-Modern India: Forging the Low-Caste Self, Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar; Kabeer, N. (2005). Introduction: The Search for ‘Inclusive’ Citizenship: Meanings and Expressions in an Inter-connected World. In Inclusive Citizenship, (ed.) Kabeer; Michelutti, L. (2008). The Vernacularisation of Democracy: Politics, Caste and Religion in India, Routledge, Delhi and LondonGoogle Scholar.

47 Nyamu-Musembi, C. (2005). Towards an Actor-Orientated Perspective. in Inclusive Citizenship, (ed.) Kabeer, p. 31Google Scholar.

48 Ibid.

49 Eyben, R. and Ladbury, S. (2006). Building Effective States: Taking a Citizen's Perspective, The Development Research Centre on Citizenship, Participation and Accountability (DRC), UKGoogle Scholar.

50 Laclau, E. (1990). Post-Marxism without Apologies. in New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time, (ed.) Laclau, E., Verso, London, pp. 97–132Google Scholar; Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar.

51 Lazar, S. (2004). Personalist Politics, Clientelism and Citizenship: Local Elections in El Alto, Bolivia, Bulletin of Latin American Research 23(2), pp. 228–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Ibid.; O'Connor, J., Orloff, A. S. and Shaver, S. (1999). States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 Hickey, S. (2009). The Politics of Protecting the Poorest: Moving beyond the ‘Anti-Politics Machine’?, Political Geography 28(8), pp. 473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 9.

54 Hickey, S. and du Toit, A. (2007). Adverse Incorporation, Social Exclusion and Chronic Poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper 81, p. 13.

55 Cornwall, Robins and Von Lieres, States of Citizenship.

56 Routley, L. (2011). Annotated Bibliography on Developmental States, Political Settlements and Citizenship Formation. Towards Increased State Capacity and Legitimacy?. ESID Working Paper 4, p. 126.

57 Gaventa et al., Putting Citizens at the Centre, p. 4.

58 Kabeer, Introduction, p. 23; Cornwall, A., Robins, S. and Von Lieres, B. (2008). Rethinking ‘Citizenship’ in the Postcolony, Third World Quarterly 29(6), pp. 1069–1086Google Scholar.

59 Kabeer, Introduction, p. 21.

60 Ibid., p. 22.

61 Chopra, D., Willams, P. and Vira, B. (2011). Politics of Citizenship: Experience State-Society Relations from the Margins, Contemporary South Asia 19(2), pp. 243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here pp. 243–245.

62 Kabeer, Introduction.

63 Hickey, The Politics of Protecting the Poorest, p. 1139.

64 Bernardo, M. (2011). The Terai: A Part of Moghlan or Gorkha? Perspectives from the Time of the Anglo-Gorkha War (1814–1816). in The Terai: History, Society, Environment, (ed.) Guneratne, Arjun, Himal Books, Kathmandu, pp. 20–24Google Scholar.

65 Ibid.

66 Drucza, Building a Socially Inclusive State.

67 Einsiedel, S., Malone, D. and Pradhan, S. (2012). Introduction. in Nepal in Transition: From People's War to Fragile Peace, (eds) Einsiedel, S., Malone, D. and Pradhan, S., Cambridge University Press, New Delhi, p. 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hangen, Creating a ‘New Nepal’.

68 Blaikie, P., Cameron, J. and Seddon, D. (2002). Peasants and Workers in Nepal, Adroit Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar; Holmberg, D. (1999). Local Production/Local Knowledge: Forced Labour from Below, Studies in Nepali History and Society 4(1), pp. 5–64Google Scholar; Regmi, M. (1978). Thatched Huts and Stucco Palaces: Peasants and Landlords in 19th Century Nepal, Vikas, New DelhiGoogle Scholar.

69 Yadav, R. (2011). On Being Madheshi. In The Terai, (ed.) Guneratne, pp. 150–160, here p. 158.

70 Robins, S. (2012). Transitional Justice and Elite Discourse, Critical Asian Studies 44(1), pp. 3–30, doi:10.1080/14672715.2012.644885CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Sahu, N. 2011. A Qualitative and Sociolinguistic Case Study of the Maithili Dalits, http://qualitative-narendra.blogspot.com, [accessed 5 March 2019].

72 Gaige, F., H. (1975). Regionalism and National Unity in Nepal, University of California Press, LondonGoogle Scholar.

73 Hutt, M. (2004). Himalayan People's War: Nepal's Maoist Rebellion, Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar.

74 Einsiedel, Malone and Pradhan, Nepal in Transition, p. 127.

75 Hutt, Himalayan People's War.

76 ISRC (2013). District and VDC Profile of Nepal 2013: A Socio-Economic Development Database of Nepal, Intensive Study and Research Centre, Kathmandu, p. 413.

77 Help Nepal Network. (2009). Comprehensive Package for Migrants and their Families, Sarlahi, http://helpnepal.net/comprehensive-package-for-migrants-and-their-families-sarlahi/, [accessed 5 March 2019].

78 ISRC, District and VDC Profile of Nepal 2013, p. 413.

79 Ibid., p. 421.

80 Ibid.., p. 416.

81 National Living Standard Survey (NLSS) III, 2010/2011, http://cbs.gov.np/nada/index.php/catalog/37, [accessed 5 March 2019].

82 DWO (2014). Fact Sheet about Dalits, Dalit Welfare Organisation, KathmanduGoogle Scholar.

83 Kohler, G. and Khatiwada, Y., R. (2014). Nepal: Social Policy in a Nascent Welfare State. in Development and Welfare Policy in South Asia, (eds) Koehler, G. and Chopra, D., Routledge, New York, Chapter 8, p. 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 DWO, Fact Sheet about Dalits.

85 Sharma, P. (2014). Some Aspects of Nepal's Social Demography: Census 2011 Update, Himal Books, Kathmandu, pp. 52–53Google Scholar.

86 Sharma, J., R. and Donini, A. (2012). From Subjects to Citizens? Labour, Mobility and Social Transformation in Rural Nepal, The Feinstein International Center, Tufts University, Somerville, MAGoogle Scholar.

87 Bal, K. C., Subedi, G. and Suwal, B., R. (2010). Forced Labour of Adults and Children in the Agriculture Sector in Nepal, ILO, KathmanduGoogle Scholar.

88 Sharma and Donini, From Subjects to Citizens?, pp. 17–18.

89 Ibid.

90 Cameron, M. (2007). Considering Dalits and Political Identity in Imagining a New Nepal, Himalaya XXVII, pp. 13–26Google Scholar, here p. 24.

91 See http://www.irinnews.org/report/91437/nepal-discrimination-continues-against-dalits, [accessed 5 March 2019].

92 Folmar, S. (2013). Problems of Identity for Hill Dalits and Nepal's Nationalist Project. in Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict: Identities and Mobilization after 1990, (eds) Lawoti, M. and Hangen, S., Routledge, New York, pp. 85–101Google Scholar.

93 There are 22 Dalit castes in Nepal. The following have Madheshi origins: Chamar/Harijan/Ram (total population size 269,661); Musahar (172,434); Dusadh/Paswan/Pasi (158,525); Tatma (76, 512); Khatbe (74, 972); Dhobi (73, 413); Bantar (35, 839); Chidimar (12,296); Dom (8,931); Mestor/Halkhor (3,621); Kuswadiya/Patharkatta (552). Bhattachan, K. B. (2008). Background Paper on Dalit Issues. In The Dalits of Nepal and New Constitution. A Resource on the Situation of Dalits in Nepal, Their Demands and the Implications for a New Constitution, United Nations Development Programme, Kathmandu, explains that some Dalits give broader groupings when asked their caste rather than their subgroup. For example, the population of Viswakarmas/Bishwokarmas is well known as they appear in all 75 districts of Nepal and include the Kamis, Damais/Dholis, and Sarkis.

94 Folmar, S. (2007). Identity Politics among Dalits in Nepal, Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies 27(1), pp. 40–53Google Scholar, here p. 43.

95 See Cameron, Considering Dalits, for an explanation of the variety of Dalit views about Dalit identity and even whether the name ‘Dalit’ subordinates or empowers.

96 In Sarlahi, many languages are spoken and this creates minorities and majorities. Maithili is the second most common language spoken after Nepali (country wide) and the Bajika language is a dialect of Maithili and is only spoken by a minority of people. Those who speak Bajika are more excluded than those who speak Maithili and have lower self-esteem on average.

97 The Rosenberg self-esteem scale is a ten item Likert scale with four response options, from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The maximum score is 30 and less than 15 suggests low self-esteem. See https://www.wwnorton.com/college/psych/psychsci/media/rosenberg.htm, [accessed 5 March 2019].

98 There have not been any local elections in Nepal since before the end of the conflict and thus there is no local government as such. What respondents mean by ‘local government’ are the civil servants they encounter within their area of residence.

99 Note: one person chose not to respond to this question and some answered 5 for central and 1 for local government. In this instance, this graph records the score for the central government.

100 Note: one person chose not to respond to this question.

101 Note: three people chose not to respond to this question.

102 Still, C. (2011). The State in the Palli: Dalit Perspectives on the State in Andhra Pradesh, Contemporary South Asia 19(3), pp. 315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 318.

103 Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivastava, M. and Veron, R. (2005). Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India, Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

104 Sijapati, B. (2013). Enhancing Employment Centric Growth in Nepal, ILO, KathmanduGoogle Scholar.

105 Lawoti, M. (2010). Informal Institutions and Exclusion in Democratic Nepal. in Ethnicity, Inequality and Politics in Nepal, (eds) Lawoti, Mahendra and Guneratne, Arjun, Himal Books, Kathmandu, pp. 18–54Google Scholar.

106 Prasad, U., S. (2012). Government Expenditure in Madhesh: Problems and Prospects. in The Landscape of Madhesh: Politics, Society and Economy of the Plains, (eds) Tewari, Ruhi and Sah, Anirudh Prasad, Nepal Madhesh Foundation, Lalitpur, pp. 43–80Google Scholar, here p. 61.

107 It is difficult to substantiate discrepancies. Only when people in the same VDC and on the same benefit have different amounts in their identity book might instalment errors be proven. In Dangre Khola, a Dalit widow who lived in the lower hills was paid NPR3,000 as her first instalment six months late and received only one other instalment that year bringing the 2012 annual total to NPR5,050 when it should have been NRP6,000. A Christian Dalit widow who lived in the same VDC but closer to town was NRP2,000 short of her yearly amount. In 2013, the widow from the hills received only one instalment whereas the one closer to town received two instalments. It seems that both widows have missed payments at different times. Even non-Dalit beneficiaries who had identity books revealed that instalments were rarely made according to the government's schedule.

108 Note: four respondents chose not to respond to this question.

109 Chatterjee, P. (2004). The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World, Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar.

110 Corbridge, S. (2007). The (Im)possibility of Development Studies, Economy and Society 36(2), pp. 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111 Nyamu-Musembi, Towards an Actor-Orientated Perspective, p. 32.

112 Chatterjee, The Politics of the Governed, p. 74, describes political society as the set of institutions, actors and cultural norms that provide the links between ‘government’ and ‘the public’. The activities of government agencies are negotiated and contested or ‘opened up’ in ‘political society’. In contrast civil society is ‘the closed association of modern elite groups, sequestered from the wider popular life of communities, walled up within enclaves of civic freedom and rational law’ (ibid., p. 4). A population group produced by ‘governmentality’ must have ‘conferred legitimacy within the domain of the modern state’ to effectively make its claim in political society (ibid., p. 75). Receiving a cash transfer provides that much-needed legitimacy for Dalits.

113 Kabeer, Introduction, p. 197.

114 Wood, G. (2004). Informal Security Regimes: Strength of Relationships. In Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social Policy in Development Contexts, (eds) Gough, Ian and Wood, Geof, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49–87Google Scholar.

115 Kabeer, Social Protection in South Asia.

116 Fraser, Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics, pp. 7–109.

117 Ferguson, Give a Man a Fish.

118 Wood, Informal Security Regimes, p. 50.