Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:05:14.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assuaging the Sikhs: Government Responses to the Akali Movement, 1920–1925

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Tai Yong Tan
Tai Yong Tan
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1920, Sikhs in the Punjab started a campaign aimed at freeing their principal gurdwaras (temples) from the control of their hereditary incumbents. The campaign quickly gathered momentum, and, within a few months, it developed into a non-violent anti-government movement. Unlike the rather shortlived 1919 Disturbances and the Non-Cooperation-Khilafat movement in the Punjab, the Sikh agitation, which came to be known as the Akali movement, did not cease until 1925 and caused considerable concern to the Punjab authorities, as well as the Government of India. The Akali movement was not limited, as in past cases of anti-British agitation involving the Sikhs, to small groups of disaffected Sikhs, returned emigrants, or Congress sympathizers; at its height in 1922, the unrest encompassed the bulk of central Punjab's Jat Sikh peasantry, one of the most militarized sections of Punjabi society. The Sikh community's martial traditions, fostered by their religious doctrines and culture, had been kept alive during British rule by the recruitment policies of the Indian Army, where, in 1920, one in every fourteen adult male Sikhs in the Punjab was in service. This meant that the abiding allegiance of the Sikh community to the Raj was a matter of considerable importance, and their estrangement, especially that of the Jat Sikh peasantry, would adversely affect the Sikh regiments of the Indian Army. It also meant that if the community as a whole was provoked into open rebellion, British hold on the Punjab could well nigh prove untenable.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 1995 , pp. 655 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Census of India, 1921, vol. 15–16, Report of the Punjab, and Annual Returns of Caste Composition of the Indian Army, 1920–1921, Indian Office Records, London [IOR]: L/MIL/14/230.Google Scholar

2 ‘The Akali Dal and the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee, 1921–1922’, a secret memorandum by V. W. Smith, superintendent of Police (Political), Criminal Intelligence Department, Punjab Govt., Gol, Home (Pol), File no. 459/11 of 1922, National Archives of India, New Delhi [NAI] (Hereafter, referred to as ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’).Google Scholar.

3 See Singh, Mohinder, The Akali Movement (Delhi, 1978);Google ScholarKapur, Rajiv, Sikh Separatism: The Politics of Faith (London, 1986);Google Scholar and Fox's, Richard, Lions of the Punjab: Culture in the Making (New Delhi, 1987).Google Scholar

4 See especially Fox, Lions of the Punjab, pp. 92–5.Google Scholar

5 See for example Low, D. A., ‘The Government of India and the First Non-Cooperation Movement—1920–1922’ in Journal of Asian Studies (JAS) 25, 2 (1966), pp. 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Barrier, N. G., ‘The Punjab Disturbances of 1907’, in Modern Asian Studies 1, 4 (1967), pp. 353–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 See for example Maynard, John, ‘The Sikh Problem in the Punjab, 1920–23’, in The Contemporary Review, 09 1923, vol. CXXIV, July-December 1923, pp. 292–303.Google Scholar

7 For a summary and discussion of doctrinal and religious debates surrounding the definition of the Sikh identity, see Mcleod, W. H., Who is a Sikh? The Problem of Sikh Identity (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar

8 The five symbols that all Khalsa Sikhs were enjoined to wear were: kes (uncut hair), kanga (a comb), kara (a steel bangle), kirpan (a sword), and kachcha (a type of breeches).Google Scholar

9 Kapur, , Sikh Separatism, p. 7.Google Scholar

10 Major R. Leech, ‘Notes on the religion of the Sikhs and other sects inhabiting the Punjab’, 12 1845, quoted in ibid.

11 Baird, J. G. A. (ed.), Private Letters of the Marquess of Dalhousie (Edinburgh, 1911), p. 69.Google Scholar

12 Quoted in Census of India, 1881, Report on the Census of the Punjab, by Ibbetson, Denzil (Calcutta, 1883), vol. 1, p. 140.Google Scholar

13 Quoted in Singh, Khushwant, History of the Sikhs, vol. 2, pp. 112–13.Google Scholar

14 Petrie, D., Developments in Sikh Politics (1900–1911): A Report (Chief Khalsa Dewan, n.d.), p. 10.Google Scholar

15 The origins and activities of the Singh Sabhas, including the politicking that took place are fully recounted in ibid.

16 For a narrative of the activities of the Arya Samaj in the Punjab, see Jones, Kenneth, ‘Communalism in the Punjab: The Arya Samaj's Contribution’ JAS 28, 1 (1968), pp. 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 King, C. M., offg. Chief Secretary to the Government, Punjab, to the Secretary to the Gol, dated Lahore, 26 03 1921. IOR: L/P&J/6/1734, fos 343–8.Google Scholar

18 Similarly, under pressure from Sikh students, evidently affected by the unrest in 1919, the government decided to withdraw official control over the Khalsa College at Lahore in 1920. See ‘Note on Sikh Question’ by H. D. Craik, oflg. Chief Secretary to the Punjab government, in GoP, Home proceedings, 05 1922, IOR: P/11277.Google Scholar

19 Smith, V. W., ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’ (see fn. 2).Google Scholar

20 Ibid.

21 Ibid.

22 King, C. M. to the Sec, Gol, Home Dept, 26 03 1921.Google Scholar

23 Maynard, , ‘The Sikh problem in the Punjab, 1920–1923’, p. 300.Google Scholar

24 Craik, H. D., ‘Review of action taken by the Punjab government to check the lawless activities of Akali associations in the Punjab’, 6 05 1922, GoP, Home proceedings, June 1922, IOR: P/H277.Google Scholar

25 King, C. M., to Sec, Gol, Home Dept, 26 03 1921.Google Scholar

26 Smith, , ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’.Google Scholar

27 Khilafat propaganda had called upon Muslim soldiers to quit military service as their continued association with the army was deemed to be un-Islamic and religiously unlawful. The Central Khilafat Committee had also made plans for the employment of paid preachers to be employed in the recruiting districts of the Punjab to spread the khilafat movement and to ‘undermine the loyalty of the army by getting at the soldiers when they were home on leave’. Weekly Report, 8 07 1921, Punjab, IOR: L/P&J/6/1726.Google Scholar

28 Smith, , ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’.Google Scholar

29 Ibid.

30 Ever since the Ghadr episode, returned Sikh emigrants were viewed with much distrust by the Punjab government, see Ibid.

31 Ibid.

32 Report of a Tour carried out by Commandant, Jullunder Brigade in the Malwa region of the Punjab. Home (Pol), 1924, File no.i/VI.Google Scholar

33 ‘Resolution issued by Punjab government in regard to present Sikh religious movement in the province’ 04 1921, in IOR: L/P&J/6/1734, pt III, fos 325–30;Google ScholarMaynard, , ‘The Sikh Problem in the Punjab, 1920–23’, p. 300.Google Scholar

34 Connolly, V., Home Secretary to Punjab govt, to all district magistrates in the Punjab, 6 09 1921, in Majithia's papers, File no. 47 Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi.Google Scholar

35 The whole account of the Nankana massacre and the events leading up to it is contained in a report of 26 03 1921 by C. M. King, who was commissioner of Lahore at the time of the massacre, and later offg. Chief Secretary to the Punjab government to Secretary, Gol, Home Dept.Google Scholar

36 King, C. M. to Sec. Gol, Home Dept, 26 03 1921.Google Scholar

37 Ibid.

38 Note by Kaye, C., 2 09 1921, Gol, Home (Pol) ‘A’ Proceedings, no. 282–315 of May 1921, NAI.Google Scholar

39 Quoted in Kapur, Rajiv, Sikh Separatism, p. 111.Google Scholar

40 Smith, , ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’.Google Scholar

41 The provisions and clauses in the Bill are found in the Sikh Gurdwaras and Shrines Act of 1921, Gol, Public and Judicial, File 1220 of 1921. IOR:L/P&J/6/1734, pt III, fos 308–22.Google Scholar

42 At least two-thirds of the Board should be non-official Sikhs, although the term Sikh as applied in the bill was not defined. See Sikh, Gurdwaras and Shrines Act of 1921.Google Scholar

43 Joseph, E., Sec, Transferred Dept, GoP to Sec. Gol, Home Dept, 24 03 1921, in Gol, Home (Pol) pros 276–81, May 1921, NAI.Google Scholar

44 The Tribune, 26 03 1921.Google Scholar

45 The Tribune, 6 04 1921.Google Scholar

46 Kapur, , Sikh Separatism, p. 119.Google Scholar

47 Ibid., p. 118.

48 Craik, , ‘Review of the Action taken by the Punjab government to check the lawless activities of some of the Akali associations in the Punjab’, 6 05 1922.Google Scholar

49 Craik, , ‘Note on the Sikh Question’, 05 1922.Google Scholar

50 Hailey to O'Dwyer, 6 08 1925, Hailey papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/7B.Google Scholar

51 Kapur, , Sikh Separatism, p. 123.Google Scholar

52 Ibid.

53 Ibid.

54 Singh, Mohinder, The Akali Movement, p. 93.Google Scholar

55 Smith, , ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’.Google Scholar

56 Lieutenent-General Shea, J. S. M., offg. Chief of General Staff, ‘The Military Aspect of the Present Situation in the Punjab’, Army Headquarters, 24 02 1922, Gol, Home (Pol), pro. 459/II, 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

57 Ibid.

58 Ibid.

59 ‘Note on the present Akali situation with suggestions for future policy’, by Sir Reginald Arthur Mant, Revenue and Finance Sec, Viceroy's Council, 30 10 1923, Hailey Papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/6A.Google Scholar

60 Shea, Lieut-Gen j. S. M, ‘The Military Aspect of the Present Situation in the Punjab’, 24 02 1922.Google Scholar

61 Punjab Fortnightly Report, (hereafter FR), 15 01 1922, Gol, Home (Pol), pro. 18 of January 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

62 FR, 15 01 1922.Google Scholar

63 ‘Note on the Present Akali Situation…,’ R. A. Mant, 30 10 1923 in Hailey Papers, IOR:MSS.EUR.E.220/6A.Google Scholar

64 Kapur, , Sikh Separatism, p. 139.Google Scholar

65 FR, 28 02 1922.Google Scholar

66 Shea, Lieut-Gen J.S.M., ‘The Military Aspect of the Present Situation in the Punjab’, 24 02 1922.Google Scholar

67 Report by Lieutenant Colonel R.H. Anderson, 45 Sikh Regiment, 6 02 1922, in Gol, Home (Pol), pro.459/11 of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

68 FR, 15 01 1922.Google Scholar

69 The units affected were 13th-16th Cavalry, 14th Sikhs, 19th Punjabis, and 9th Bhopal Infantry. See ‘Brief Note on Trouble in four Indian Units during February 1922’ in Gol, Home (Pol), pro.459/11 of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

70 Report by Sant Singh, Criminal Intelligence Bureau, 7 03 1922 in Gol, Home (Pol), pro.459/11 of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

71 Memo from W. F. Bainbridge, Colonel-Commandant, Jullunder Brigade Area, to Headquarters, Lahore District, Lahore Cantonment, 8 02, 1922 in Gol, Home (Pol), pro.459/11 of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

72 Recruiting Officer, Jullunder, to the Chief of the General Staff, Simla, 3 03 1922, in Gol, Home (Pol), pro.459/11 of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

73 Report from Officer Commanding of 23 Sikh Pioneers, 2 02 1922, in Gol, Army Department Note of 1922, Home (Pol), File 415.Google Scholar

74 FR, 31 01 1922.Google Scholar

75 ‘Sikh and the Government’, pamphlet published by Punjab government, 27 11 1922, in Salmon Papers, no. 44, File no. 4, Centre of South Asian Studies, Cambridge [SAS].Google Scholar

76 Civil and Military Gazette, 9 11 1922, (Lahore 1922), in Salmon Papers, no. 50A, file no. 4, SAS.Google Scholar

77 Craik, H. D., ‘Review of action taken by the Punjab government to check the lawless activities of the Akalis’, 6 05 1922, GoP, Home Proceedings. IOR:P/11277.Google Scholar

78 Report from the Recruiting Officer, Jullunder, to the Chief of the General Staff, Simla, Jullunder, 3 03 1922 in Gol, Home (Pol), pro. 459/II of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

79 Smith, , ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’.Google Scholar

80 Note by S. P. O'Donnel, 18 02 1922, Gol, Home (Pol), pro. 459/II of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

81 Notes by C. A. Innes, 20 02 1922, in Note by O'Donnel, 18 February 1922.Google Scholar

82 Shea, Lieut-Gen J. S. M., ‘The Military Aspect of the Present Situation in the Punjab’, 24 02 1922.Google Scholar

83 FR,15 01 1922.Google Scholar

84 Punjab govt Press communique,10 03 1922, Gol, Home (Pol) pro. 459/II of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

85 ‘Operations against the Akalis’, S.P. O'Donnel to Sir William Duke, Under Sec of State, India, 20 04 1922. IOR:L/P&J/6/1734, pt II, fos 223–9.Google Scholar

86 Ibid., fo. 225

87 ‘Instructions bearing of present political situation in the Punjab’, from Chief Sec, GoP to all Deputy Commissioners of Sikh districts,16 02 1922. IOR: L/P&J/6/1734, pt.II, fos 235–8.Google Scholar

88 Ibid.; see also Craik, , ‘Review of action taken against the Akalis…’, 6 05 1922.Google Scholar

89 Statement by the Punjab government regarding the Guru Ka Bagh, Gol, Home (Political) proceedings, no 914 of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

90 ‘Sikhs and Government’, p. 5.Google Scholar

91 FR, 15 09 1922.Google Scholar

92 Smith, ‘Akali Dal and SGPC’.Google Scholar

93 FR, 15 09 1922.Google Scholar

94 In a village in Ferozepur tehsil, four Indian officers received invitations to the Royal visit and were determined to be present but failed to do so because, according to an informant, the Akali influence was too strong for them and they were in some ways prevented. Gwynne to O'Donnel, 20 09 1922, Gol Home (Pol) pro. 914 of 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

95 Ibid.

96 ‘Report of Tour of Jullunder District’, in Gol, Home (Pol) pro. 15/II 1924, NAI.Google Scholar

97 See Andrews, C. F.’ eye-witness account at Guru Ka Bagh in Ruchi Ram Sahni, (edited by Singh, Ganda), Struggle for Reforms in the Sikh Shrines (Sikh Ithas Research Board, SGPC, Amritsar, n.d.), pp. 176–83.Google Scholar

98 ‘Note on the present Akali situation…’, A. R. Mant, 30 10 1923, in Hailey private papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.Q20/6A.Google Scholar

99 FR, 31 10 1922.Google Scholar

100 See ‘A Bill to provide for the Administration and Management of certain Sikh gurdwaras and shrines, and for an enquiry in the matters connected therewith’, Punjab Gazette, 17 11 1922.Google Scholar

101 Kapur, Sikh Separatism, pp. 158–60.Google Scholar

102 Note by C.M.G. Ogilvie, 4 November 1922, GoI, Home (Pol), pro.914 1922, NAI.Google Scholar

103 Note by W. M. Hailey, 15 11 1922Google Scholar, in ibid.

104 S. P. O'Donnel to H. D. Craik, 20 November 1922, in ibid.

105 FR, 30 Nov. 1922.Google Scholar

106 For a fuller account of the events that led to the abdication of the ruler of the Nabha, see Mohinder Singh, The Akali Movement, p. 180.Google Scholar

107 FR, 15 Dec. 1923; Yadav, Kripal C., Elections in the Punjab, 1920–1947 (New Delhi, 1987), pp. 56–7.Google Scholar

108 Quoted in the memorandum on the Akali situation by Malcolm Hailey, 20 June 1924, MSS.EUR.E.220/6A.Google Scholar

109 Based on Singh, Ganda (ed.), Some Confidential Papers of the Akali Movement (Amritsar, 1965), pp. 69–71; The Birdwood Committee, GOI, Home (Pol), no. 297 of 1924, NAI.Google Scholar

110 Memorandum by Hailey, W. M. on the Akali situation, 20 June 1924, Hailey papers, IOR: MSS. EUR. E. 220/6A.Google Scholar

111 Memo by Hailey, Malcolm on the Akali situation, 20 June 1924.Google Scholar

112 See the correspondence between Hailey and Vincent in Hailey's collections, IOR: MSS. EUR. E. 220/5D.Google Scholar

113 For instance, he strongly advocated the formation of the Board of Commission in the Punjab as provided by the 1922 Bill, as a means of removing disputes over gurdwara management, which had been the basis of continued Sikh agitation in the Punjab.Google Scholar

114 Memo by Hailey, Malcolm on the Akali situation, 20 June 1924.Google Scholar

115 Hailey to Birdwood, 20 June 1924, Hailey papers, IOR: MSS. EUR. E. 220/6A.Google Scholar

116 Craik, H. D., chief secretary to Punjab government, to Major Ogilvie, deputy secretary to the GoI, Foreign and Political Dept, 27 June 1924 in Hailey papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/6A.Google Scholar

117 Ibid.

118 Memo by Hailey, Malcolm on the Akali situation, 20 June 1924.Google Scholar

119 Craik, H. D., Chief Sec, Punjab Govt to T. Sloan, Dy Sec to GoI, Home Dept, 5 July 1924, GoI, Home (Pol), File i/VI of 1924, NAI.Google Scholar

120 Hailey, W. M. to G. de Montmorency, private secretary to the Viceroy, 8 July 1924, in Hailey papers, IOR: MSS. EUR.E.220/6A.Google Scholar

121 Lists showing grants of colony land to Sikhs for loyalty to government can be found in files 301/3/25/5A-B in the Board of Revenue Department, Lahore, Pakistan.Google Scholar

122 Mitra, H. N. (ed.), Indian Annual Register (IAR), 1924, vol. II, (Delhi, reprint, 1988), pp. 199–200Google Scholar

123 Hailey, W. M. to Vincent, 7 November 1923, Hailey Papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/5D.Google Scholar

124 Hailey, W. M. to Malcolm Seton, Clerk of Council, 17 July 1924, Hailey papers, IOR:MSS.EUR.E.220/6A.Google Scholar

125 F. R., 31 July and 31 August 1924;Google ScholarHailey, W. M. to Vincent, W., 12 08 1924, Hailey papers, IOR:MSS.EUR.E.220/6B.Google Scholar

126 F. R., 15 August 1924; see also Hailey, W. M. to G. de Montmorency, 8 July 1924, Hailey papers, IOR:MSS.EUR.E.220/6A.Google Scholar

127 Hailey, W. M. to de Montmorency, 20 August 1924, Hailey papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/6B.Google Scholar

128 Hailey to de Montmorency, 5 August 1924, Hailey private papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/6B.Google Scholar

129 See Gudwaras, Sikh and Bill, Shrines of 1925 as reproduced in Punjab Gazette, 26 June 1925.Google Scholar

130 Hailey, W. M. to Langley, A., commissioner of Lahore, 25 November 1924, Hailey papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/6C.Google Scholar

131 All these conditions were insisted upon by Hailey during the drafting of the Bill. See Hailey to Muddiman, 25 November 1924, Hailey papers, IOR: MSS.EUR.E.220/6C.Google Scholar

132 For this story, see Tan, T. Y., ‘Sikh Responses to the Demand for Pakistan, 1940–47’, unpublished MA thesis, National University of Singapore, 1989.Google Scholar