Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:29:33.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘An Ambiguous Area’: Mongolia in Soviet-Japanese relations in the mid-1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2019

BRIAN BRIDGES Open the ORCID record for BRIAN BRIDGES [Opens in a new window]
BRIAN BRIDGES*
Affiliation:
Centre for Asian Pacific Studies, Lingnan University Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mongolian People's Republic (MPR) became the focus of intense competition between the Soviet Union and Japan in the 1930s, when it was more commonly known as Outer Mongolia. The Soviet Union viewed the MPR as an ideological and strategic ally, and was determined to defend that state against the increasingly adventurist actions of the Japanese military based in northern China. Japanese ambitions to solve the so-called ‘Manmo’ (Manchuria-Mongolia) problem led the Soviets to initiate ever-closer links with the MPR, culminating in the 1936 pact of mutual assistance which was intended to constrain Japanese pressure. Using unpublished Japanese materials as well as Russian and Mongolian sources, this article demonstrates how the Soviet leadership increasingly viewed the MPR as strategically crucial to the defence of the Soviet Far East.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , May 2020 , pp. 730 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is a much-revised and updated version of a paper previously presented at the International Centre for Economic and Related Disciplines at the London School of Economics and Political Science, which is available as International Studies discussion paper 1982/II. I am grateful for the helpful comments by Professor Ian Nish and colleagues at the original symposium and by the three anonymous reviewers of this journal.

References

1 Fleming, P., News from Tartary, George Allen and Unwin, London, 1936, p. 18Google Scholar.

2 For a detailed diplomatic history of Manchuria and Manchukuo, see Nish, I., The History of Manchuria, 1840–1948: A Sino-Russo-Japanese Triangle, Renaissance Books, Folkestone, 2016Google Scholar.

3 Nakami, T., ‘Mongol Nationalism and Japan’, in Imperial Japan and National Identities in Asia, 1895–1945, Li, N. and Cribb, R. (eds), RoutledgeCurzon, London, 2003, pp. 90–105Google Scholar; Boyd, J., ‘Horse power: the Japanese army, Mongolia and the horse, 1927–43’, Japan Forum, 22 (1–2), 2010, pp. 23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 S. Araki, ‘Japan's Mission in the Showa Era’, dated 1933, International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Exhibit No. 760A, Prosecution Document No. 2627A, National Diet Library of Japan.

5 Elleman, B., ‘Secret Sino-Soviet negotiations on Outer Mongolia, 1918–1925’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 66, Winter 1993, pp. 539–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A small territory on the northern borders of the MPR, Tunna Tuva, remained nominally independent from both the MPR and China from 1921–1944; populated mostly by Turkic-speaking Mongols, it was under strong Soviet control. Paine, S. C. M., Imperial Rivals: China, Russia and their Disputed Frontier, M. E. Sharpe, New York, 1996, pp. 327–329Google Scholar.

6 Boikova, E., ‘Aspects of Soviet-Mongolian Relations, 1929–1939’, in Mongolia in the Twentieth Century: Landlocked Cosmopolitan, Kotka, S. and Elleman, B. (eds), M. E. Sharpe, New York, 1999, p. 108Google Scholar.

7 J. Nordby, ‘The Mongolian People's Republic, 1924–1928, and the Right Deviation’, PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 1988, http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2241/uk_bl_ethos_234006.pdf, [accessed 24 May 2019]. Boikova, ‘Aspects of Soviet-Mongolian Relations’, pp. 108–110, describes a Soviet-MPR agreement of 1929 that ‘outlined the main principles of trade cooperation’, as the Soviet government ‘sought to monopolize almost all economic relations with the MPR’. These close economic links led to stronger political, ideological, and military relations.

8 Most extensively by Coox, A., Nomonhan: Japan Against Russia, 1939, 2 vols, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1990Google Scholar. See also Tsuji, M., Nomonhan, Hara Shobo, Tokyo, 1975Google Scholar; Colvin, J., Nomonhan, Quartet Books, London, 1999Google Scholar.

9 Hosoya, C., ‘Japan's Policies toward Russia’, in Japan's Foreign Policy, 1868–1941: A Research Guide, Morley, J. W. (ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, 1974, pp. 340–395Google Scholar.

10 Lensen, G. A., Japanese Recognition of the U.S.S.R.: Soviet-Japanese Relations 1921–1930, Sophia University, Tokyo, 1970, pp. 178, 366–367Google Scholar.

11 Gates, R., ‘Solving the “Manchurian problem”: Uchida Yasuya and Japanese foreign affairs before the Second World War’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, vol. 23, 2012, pp. 23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Boyd, J., Japanese-Mongolian Relations, 1873–1945: Faith, Race and Strategy, Global Oriental, Folkestone, 2011, p. 25Google Scholar.

13 Hata, I., Nitchu Sensoshi, Kawade Shobo, Tokyo, 1961, pp. 105–114Google Scholar.

14 Coble, P. M., Facing Japan: Chinese Politics and Japanese Imperialism, 1931–1937, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1991, pp. 208–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Bulag, U. E., Collaborative Nationalism: The Politics of Friendship on China's Mongolian Frontier, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2010, p. 114Google Scholar.

16 Iriye, A., ‘The Failure of Military Expansionism’, in Dilemmas of Growth in Prewar Japan, Morley, J. W. (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971, p. 110Google Scholar.

17 The definitive account of the 1929 clashes is found in Walker, M. M., The 1929 Sino-Soviet War: The War Nobody Knew, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Hata, I., ‘The Japanese-Soviet Confrontation’, in Deterrent Diplomacy: Japan, Germany and the USSR, 1935–1940, Morley, J. W. (ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, 1976, p. 131Google Scholar.

19 Peattie, M., Ishiwara Kanji and Japan's Confrontation with the West, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975, pp. 186–203Google Scholar.

20 Japan Military Archives [hereafter JMA], Centre for Military History, National Institute for Defense Studies, Tokyo, file: ‘Manshu in kansuru yoheiteki kansatsu’, vol. 13, ‘Kyokuto soren no senryakuteki tokusei in kansuru kansatsu’.

21 Hosoya, ‘Japan's Policies’, pp. 397–398.

22 Nish, I., Japanese Foreign Policy, 1869–1942, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1977, pp. 201–202Google Scholar.

23 Bridges, B., ‘Yoshizawa Kenkichi and the Soviet-Japanese Non-Aggression Pact proposal’, Modern Asian Studies, 14 (1), February 1980, pp. 111–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Lensen, G. A., The Damned Inheritance: The Soviet Union and the Manchurian Crises 1924–1935, Diplomatic Press, Tallahassee, 1974, pp. 212–334Google Scholar.

25 Haslam, J., The Soviet Union and the Threat from the East, Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh, 1992, p. 52Google Scholar; Dokumenty Vneshnei Politiki SSSR [D.V.P. hereafter], vol. XIX, Ministerstvo Inostrannykh Del SSSR, Moscow, 1974, p. 196Google Scholar.

26 D.V.P. vol. XIX, p. 196.

27 Haslam, The Soviet Union, p. 41.

28 Liu, X., Reins of Liberation: An Entangled History of Mongolian Independence, Chinese Territoriality and Great Power Hegemony, 1911–1950, Stanford University Press, Chicago, 2006, pp. 68–69Google Scholar; Morozova, I. Y., Socialist Revolutions in Asia: The Social History of Mongolia in the Twentieth Century, Routledge, London, 2009, pp. 83–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar. However, Batbayar, T., ‘The Japanese Threat and Stalin's Policies towards Outer Mongolia (1932–1939)’, in Imperial Japan and National Identities in Asia, 1895–1945, Li, N. and Cribb, R. (eds), RoutledgeCurzon, London, 2003, p. 173Google Scholar, does not list Stalin as a regular member.

29 Boikova, ‘Aspects of Soviet-Mongolian Relations’, p. 111; Batbayar, ‘The Japanese Threat’, p. 175.

30 Lensen, Damned Inheritance, p. 446.

31 Nish, Japanese Foreign Policy, p. 195.

32 Hata, ‘Japanese-Soviet Confrontation’, p. 133; Batbayar, ‘The Japanese Threat’, pp. 177–179. See also the Soviet submission to the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Exhibit No. 750, Prosecution Document No. 1953, National Diet Library of Japan.

33 Hata, ‘Japanese-Soviet Confrontation’, p. 136.

34 Japan-Manchoukuo Yearbook 1937, Japan-Manchoukuo Year Book Co., Tokyo, 1937, pp. 711–712Google Scholar; Batbayar, ‘The Japanese Threat’, pp. 179–180.

35 D.V.P. vol. XVIII, pp. 443–444.

36 Ibid., p. 439.

37 Ibid., pp. 462–464, 649–650.

38 Foreign Office Papers, The National Archives, London [hereafter TNA], Cadogan to Hoare, 24 July 1935, F4858/437/10, FO 371/19309.

39 Japanese Foreign Ministry Archives, Gaimusho Gaiko Shiryokan, Tokyo [hereafter JFMA], ‘Manmo seikyo kankei zappitsu: naimoko kankei’, vol. 3, file A.6.1.2.1–14.

40 JFMA, ‘Manmo jijo kankei zappitsu: moko jijo’, file A.6.1.2.8.

41 Historians differ over the content, tone, and even timing of the Stalin-Gendun discussions. Baabar, B., History of Mongolia, Monsudar, Ulaanbataar, 1999, p. 322Google Scholar, asserts that a serious disagreement arose between the two leaders over dealing with the problem of the 100,000 lamas in Mongolia. Stalin, suspicious of the lamas’ religious devotion and claiming that they had counter-revolutionary links to Japan, ordered the MPR leadership to liquidate them, but Gendun, an intensely religious man, had refused. Boikova, ‘Aspects of Soviet-Mongolian Relations’, pp. 112–113, supports this analysis of cooling relations with Stalin, but argues that Gendun was actually defeated politically in an internal power struggle during 1934, leaving the MPR delegation to Moscow in November 1934 no option but to accept the gentlemen's agreement. Nevertheless, Gendun was able to retain his prime ministerial post, at least for the immediate future.

42 Friters, G., Outer Mongolia and its International Position, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1949, p. 143Google Scholar; Brown, W. and Unon, U., History of the Mongolian People's Republic, Harvard University, London, 1976, p. 349Google Scholar. Typifying what Soviet legal scholars called an ‘oral treaty’, the text is not printed in either the relevant D.V.P. volume—XVII—or in the most comprehensive collection of documents on Soviet-Mongolian relations: Kazakevich, I. C. (ed.), Sovetsko-Mongolskie Othnosheniya: Dokumenti i Materiali, Tom 1 (1921–1940), Izdatelstvo Mezhudunarodnie Otnosheniya, Moscow, 1975Google Scholar, both of which cite only a brief extract in a footnote.

43 Lkhagva, T., ‘What was Stalin's real attitude to the Mongols’, Far Eastern Affairs, no. 4, 1991, p. 119Google Scholar. During the autumn of 1935 Stalin had also criticized the Mongols for not spending enough on defence, insisting that 70–80 per cent of the state budget should be spent on defence. Kuromiya, H., ‘Stalin's Great Terror and the Asian nexus’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 66, July 2014, p. 781CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Boikova, ‘Aspects of Soviet-Mongolian Relations’, pp. 110–111; Kuromiya, ‘Stalin's Great Terror’, p. 779.

45 Friters, Outer Mongolia, p. 237.

46 D.V.P. vol. XVIII, p. 558.

47 Moscow Daily News, 3 January 1936. Mongolian sources report disagreements in private between Stalin and Gendun. After becoming drunk on one occasion, Gendun apparently told Stalin that he (Gendun) was the heir of Genghis Khan and would not to be pushed around; Stalin reportedly swore revenge. See Rupen, R., Mongols of the Twentieth Century, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1964, p. 250Google Scholar; Lkhagva, ‘What was Stalin's real attitude’, p. 127; and S. Sandag and Kendall, H. H., Poisoned Arrows: The Stalin-Choibalsan Mongolian Massacres, 1921–1941, Westview Press, Boulder, 2000, p. 77Google Scholar.

48 JFMA,‘Sorenpo chukaminkokukan fushinryakujoyaku kankei ikken’, file B.1.0.0.C/R2.

49 TNA, Manchukuo Annual Report, 22 December 1936, file F1051/1051, FO371/21001; Butler to Eden, 14 April 1936, file F2511/54/10, FO 371/20235.

50 Japan-Manchoukuo Yearbook, p. 712.

51 Uno, S., ‘Hirota koki no taikaseisaku to sho kaiseki’, Kokusai Seiji, no. 56, 1976, pp. 40–42Google Scholar; Shiroyama, S., War Criminal: The Life and Death of Hirota Koki, Kodansha International, Tokyo, 1977, pp. 120–122Google Scholar; JFMA, ‘Teikoku no taishi gaiko seisaku kankei ikken’, vol. 4, file A.1.1.0.10.

52 D.V.P. vol. XVIII, pp. 538, 601.

53 T. Ohata, ‘The Anti-Comintern Pact’, in Deterrent Diplomacy, Morley (ed.), pp. 23–27, 37.

54 Sudets, V., ‘Rout of Japanese Militarists at the Halhyn-Gol’, Far Eastern Affairs, no. 4, 1979, p. 49Google Scholar.

55 JFMA, ‘Sorenpo naisei kankei zassan’, vol. 4, file A.6.5.0.1.

56 Shillony, B-A., Revolt in Japan: The Young Officers and the February 26, 1936 Incident, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973Google Scholar.

57 Prange, G. W., Target Tokyo: The Story of the Sorge Spy Ring, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984, pp. 117–126Google Scholar; Jun, Tsunoda (ed.), Gendaishi Shiryo: Zoruge Jiken (1), Misuzushobo, Tokyo, 1962, pp. 253–254Google Scholar.

58 D.V.P. vol. XIX, pp. 195–198.

59 Friters, Outer Mongolia, p. 144; D.V.P. vol. XIX, pp. 105–106. The Russian version of the interview was published in Izvestiya on 5 March 1936.

60 D.V.P. vol. XIX, pp. 122, 132–134, 196.

61 On 20 February Litvinov had warned Yurenev that Moscow's information was that although the agreement ‘has not yet been formalised … the signature will take place in the near future’. Ibid., pp. 96–97.

62 Ibid., pp. 136–137, for the full text in Russian. Author's own translation used here. A partial English translation can be found in Sanders, Alan J. K., Historical Dictionary of Mongolia, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, 2003, p. 231Google Scholar.

63 The Tauran clash, in which Mongolian horsemen, motorized infantry, and biplanes took on Japanese small tanks and artillery, is described in detail in Colvin, Nomonhan, pp. 40–41.

64 D.V.P. vol. XIX, p. 242; Moscow Daily News, 8 April 1936; Batbayar, ‘The Japanese Threat’, pp. 184–185.

65 D.V.P. vol. XIX, p. 197.

66 Ibid., pp. 282–283; Kazakevich, Sovetsko-Mongolskie Othnosheniya, pp. 341–344; JFMA, ‘Sorenpo chukaminkokukan fushinryakujoyaku kankei ikken’, file B.1.0.0.C/R2.

67 D.V.P. vol. XIX, pp. 282–283.

68 Liu, Reins of Liberation, pp. 90–97.

69 Ibid., pp. 98–100; Snow, E., Red Star Over China, Pelican, London, 1972, p. 505Google Scholar.

70 JFMA, ‘Sorenpo chukaminkokukan fushinryakujoyaku kankei ikken’, file B.1.0.0.C/R2.

71 JFMA, ‘Somo sogoenjo giteisho’, file A.2.2.2.C/R1-3.

72 TNA, Butler to Eden, 14 April 1936, file F2511/54/10, FO 371/20235.

73 JFMA, ‘Showa juichinendo shitsumu hokoku: Toakyoku’, file S.P.319.

74 Akamatsu, Y., Showa juichinen no kokusai josei, Nihon Kokusai Kyokai, Tokyo, 1937, pp. 106–107Google Scholar; Pu, H. Y. and Kramer, P., The Last Manchu: The Autobiography of Henry Pu Yi, Last Emperor of China, Skyhorse Publishing, New York, 2010Google Scholar; Kuromiya, ‘Stalin's Great Terror’, p. 780.

75 Japan Chronicle, 1 May 1936.

76 Nishi, H. (ed.), Nihon gaikoshi: Nisso kokko mondai, 1917–1945, Kajima Heiwa Kenkyujo Shuppankai, Tokyo, 1970, p. 169Google Scholar; D.V.P. vol. XIX, pp. 244–247.

77 Hata, Nitchu sensoshi, pp. 105–114; Boyd, Japanese-Mongolian Relations, pp. 152–153.

78 Toshito, Obi (ed.), Gendaishi Shiryo: Nitchu Senso (1), Misuzushobo, Tokyo, 1964, pp. 540–547Google Scholar.

79 JMA, ‘Rikuman mitsutetsu daigogo: Showa juichinen daigogo’.

80 Nitchu Senso (1), pp. 540–546; Gaimusho-hen, , Nihon Gaiko Nenpyo narabini Shuyo Bunsho, vol. 2, Hara Shobo, Tokyo, 1965, p. 332Google Scholar.

81 Nitchu Senso (1), p. 554; Boyd, Japanese-Mongolian Relations, p. 153.

82 JFMA, ‘Sumitsuin ni okeru daijin no setsumei shiryo: naimo kosaku no genjo’, file A.6.1.2.1-14.

83 JFMA, ‘Manmo seikyo kankei zappitsu: naimoko kankei’, vol. 3, file A.6.1.2.1-14.

84 TNA, Dening to Eden, 24 July 1936, file F5647/54/10, FO 371/20235.

85 Japan Chronicle, 24 and 29 April 1936.

86 JFMA.‘Manshu in kansuru yoheiteki kansatsu’, vol. 13, ‘Kyokuto soren no senryakuteki tokusei in kansuru kansatsu’.

87 Batbayar, ‘The Japanese Threat’, pp. 185–186.

88 Nishi (ed.), Nihon gaikoshi, pp. 169–173, 176–177; Lensen, G. A., The Strange Neutrality: Soviet-Japanese Relations during the Second World War 1941–1945, Diplomatic Press, Tallahassee, 1972, pp. 15–18, 279Google Scholar.

89 Hata, Nitchu sensoshi, pp. 112–121; Bulag, U. E., ‘The yearning for “friendship”: Resisting “the political” in minority revolutionary history in China’, Journal of Asian Studies, 65 (1), 2006, pp. 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Crowley, J., Japan's Quest for Autonomy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1966, p. 306Google Scholar.

91 A Czech scholar wrote that Soviet troops were stationed in the MPR from September 1936, but Morozova, Socialist Revolutions, p. 96, suggests 1937. See Sima, J., ‘International position of Mongolian People's Republic’, Pacific Community, 4 (4), July 1973, pp. 569–70Google Scholar. According to Kuromiya, ‘Stalin's Great Terror’, p. 788, troop numbers had grown to almost 60,000 by the end of 1938.

92 Morozova, Socialist Revolutions, pp. 96–100. Kuromiya, ‘Stalin's Great Terror’, p. 787, estimates that around 3 per cent of the total MPR population were executed in the 1937–1939 ‘Great Terror’.

93 Sandag and Kendall, Poisoned Arrows, p. 78. He was posthumously rehabilitated in 1962.

94 D.V.P. vol. XVIII, p. 670.

95 TNA, Chilston to Eden, 3 April 1936, file F1864/54/10, FO 371/20235.

96 D.V.P. vol. XVI, p. 574.

97 TNA, Clive to Eden, 15 February 1936, file F881/54/10, FO 371/20234.

98 Crowley, Japan's Quest, pp. 295–300.

99 Hata, ‘Japanese-Soviet Confrontation’, pp. 157–178. Nish, Japanese Foreign Policy, p. 240, describes the ‘shattering psychological effect on the army’ of this defeat.

100 D.V.P. vol. XVI, p. 299.

101 Chang, J. and Halliday, J., Mao: The Unknown Story, Jonathan Cape, London, 2005, pp. 364–369Google Scholar.