Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:58:44.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agricultural Trends in Bombay Presidency 1900–1920: The Illusion of Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Satish Chandra Mishra
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia

Extract

The subject of agricultural growth is a matter of central importance in the evaluation of the impact of colonial rule on India. Given that the agricultural sector provided a very large share of total output and employment, movements in the per capita agricultural output would be a good indicator of changes in per capita income. Despite the usual caveats made about the dangers of using per capita income as a measure of welfare, a sustained fall in such income would imply a failure of state economic policy in a crucial respect.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagchi, A. K. (1976) ‘De-industrialisation in India in the 19th Century: Some Theoretical Implications’, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, 01.Google Scholar
Blyn, G. (1966), Agricultural Trends in India 1891–1947: Output, Availability and Productivity, University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashman, R. J. (1975), The Myth of the Lakmanya, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Chandra, N. (1974), ‘Farm Efficiency under Semi Feudalism: A Critique of Marginalist Theories and Some Marxist Formulations’, Economic and Political Weekly, Special Number, 08.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, N. (1974), ‘Agrarian Society and British Administration in Western India’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University, History Faculty.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, N. (1978), ‘Rich Peasants and Poor Peasants in Late 19th Century Maharashtra’, in Dewey, C. and Hopkins, A. (eds), The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa ana India, London.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, N. (1979), ‘Trends in the Agricultural Performance of an Indian Province: The Bombay Presidency, 1900–1920’, in Chaudhuri, K. N. and Dewey, C. J. (eds), Economy and Society, Bombay, O.U.P.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, N. (1980), ‘The Changing Organisation of Landholding in Western India, 1900–1939: A Case of Agrarian Involution’, unpublished paper presented to Centre of International and Area Studies, London University.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, N. (1982) British Rule and the Indian Economy: 1800–1914, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, A. V. (1978) ‘Revenue Administration and Agricultural Statistics in Bombay Presidency’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. XV, no. 2.Google Scholar
Dewey, C. J. (1974) ‘The Agricultural Statistics of the Punjab: 1867–1947’, Bulletin of Quantitative and Computer Methods in South Asian Studies, no. 2, 03.Google Scholar
Dewey, C. J. (1978) ‘The Agricultural Output of an Indian Province: The Punjab, 1870–1940’, Discussion Paper presented to the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London, 04 30.Google Scholar
Harnetty, P. (1971), ‘Cotton Exports and Indian Agriculture, 1861–1870’, Economic History Review, Vol. XXIV, no. 3.Google Scholar
Heston, A. (1973), ‘Official Yields per Acre in India, 1886–1947; Some Questions of Interpretation’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. X, no. 2.Google Scholar
Heston, A. (1978) ‘A Further Critique of Historical Yields per Acre in India’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. XV, no. 2.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, D. (1967), ‘Surplus Agricultural Labour and the Development of a Dual Economy’, reprinted in Singh, S. P. (ed.) (1978), Underdevelopment to Developing Economies, Bombay.Google Scholar
Kay, G. (1975), Development and Underdevelopment: a Marxist Analysis, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Khatkhate, D. R. (1962) ‘Some Notes on the Real Effects of Foreign Surplus Disposal in Underdeveloped Economies’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 76, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, W. J. (1972), ‘Economic Development in India under the British Crown, 1858–1947’, in Youngson, A. J. (ed.), Economic Development in the Long Run, Plymouth.Google Scholar
Mathur, P. N. and Ezekiel, H. (1961), ‘Marketable Surplus of Food and Price Fluctuations in a Developing Economy’, Kyklos, vol. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpin, M. B. (1975) ‘Railroads, Cultivation Patterns and Foodgrain Availability’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, January–March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpin, M. B. (1975), ‘The Effects of Expansion of Markets on Rural Income Distribution in 19th Century India’, Explorations in Economic History, vol. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, S. C. (1981), ‘Patterns of Long Run Agrarian Change in Bombay and Punjab, 1881–1972’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University, Economics Faculty.Google Scholar
Mishra, S. C. (1982), ‘Commercialisation, Peasant Differentiation and Merchant Capital in Late 19th Century Bombay and Punjab’, Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, 10.Google Scholar
Mishra, S. C. (1983a), ‘On the Reliability of Pre-Independence Agricultural Statistics in Bombay and Punjab’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, no. 2, 0609.Google Scholar
Mishra, S. C. (1983b), ‘Casual Empiricism and the Fallacy of the Warrenite View of Colonialism and Capitalism in India’, Paper presented to the South Asia Research Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, March.Google Scholar
Mishra, S. C. (1983c), ‘Estimating Growth of Agricultural Output in Pre-Independence India: Some Fashionable Misconceptions’, Discussion Paper, School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
Morris, M. D. (1965), The Emergence of an Industrial Labour Force in India, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Narain, D. (1965) The Impact of Price Movements on Areas under Selected crops in India, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rudra, A. (1973), ‘Allocative Efficiency of Indian Farmers: Some Methodological Doubts,’ Economic and Political Weekly, 20 01.Google Scholar
Saith, A. (1978), ‘Agrarian Structure, Technology and Marketed Surplus in the Indian Economy’, unpublished Ph.D., Cambridge University, Economics Faculty.Google Scholar
Saith, A. and Tankha, A. (1972) ‘Economic Decision Making of the Poor peasantry’, Economic and Political Weekly, Annual no, 02.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. (1964), Transforming Traditional Agriculture, Yale.Google Scholar