Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:55:18.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Achieving Reversion: Protest and Authority in Okinawa, 1952-70

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2003

Christopher Aldous
Affiliation:
King Alfred's College of Higher Education, Winchester

Abstract

The build-up and development of the Okinawan struggle for reversion to Japanese administration does not figure prominently in the English-language literature on the American occupation of Okinawa, nor does it occupy a central place in Japanese analyses of this subject. Rather there is a tendency to view Okinawa as a subset of US-Japanese postwar relations, and to explain reversion as a process carried through by senior American and Japanese officials, largely governed by high-level diplomatic and military-strategic considerations. There is often only passing mention of the rising tensions within Okinawa itself and, perhaps more importantly, the increasing effectiveness through the 1960s of the indigenous reversion movement centred on the Okinawa Teachers' Association (Okinawa kyōshokuinkai). For example, John Welfield's trenchant account of the ‘three years of tortuous negotiations’ that culminated in November 1969 in an American pledge to return the islands hardly mentions conflicts within Okinawa itself, remarking only that ‘the swing to the left’ in 1968 foreshadowed major problems for the US if Okinawan demands for reversion were not met.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is the product of a four week stay in Naha in March 2001, generously funded by the Japan Foundation Endowment Committee. The requisite research was conducted at the Okinawa Prefectural Archives (OPA). An earlier version of this paper was presented at a workshop on postwar Okinawa (6–7 April 2001), hosted by The School of East Asian Studies, University of Sheffield. The author is grateful to Dr Gordon Daniels and the anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on the original draft.