Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:22:00.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘We are all sondukarar (relatives)!’: kinship and its morality in an urban industry of Tamilnadu, South India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2008

GEERT DE NEVE
GEERT DE NEVE*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, U.K. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is concerned with the role of kinship and kin morality in contexts of work in South Asia. It focuses on the highly ambivalent nature of kin morality when mobilised outside the household and the family. Ethnographic evidence from a small-scale industry in Tamilnadu, South India, shows how employers frequently invoke the morality of kinship and caste in an attempt to secure a reliable and compliant labour force and to avoid overt class confrontation. However, employers’ efforts to promote kinship—real or fictive—and its morality in the workplace appear inadequate in the face of high labour turnover and frequently collapsing employer-worker relationships in small-scale industries. While employers’ repeated use of kin ideology succeeds in silencing the workers on the shop floor, it is much less effective in securing a stable labour force in the long run. The argument put forward here points to the limits of kin morality and questions its effectiveness in informal contexts of labour employment. The discussion sheds new light on the role of caste and kinship in recruiting, retaining and disciplining labour in India's informal economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 211 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloch, Maurice. 1971. The Moral and the Tactical Meaning of Kinship Terms, in Man n.s. 6 (1):79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Maurice. 1973. The Long and the Short Term: The Economic and Political Significance of the Morality of Kinship, in Goody, J. (ed.), The Character of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Béteille, A. 1969. Ideas and Interests: Some conceptual problems in the study of social stratification in rural India. In International Social Science Journal 21 (2): 219–35.Google Scholar
Breman, Jan. 1993. Beyond Patronage and Exploitation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breman, Jan. 1994. Wage hunters and gatherers. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breman, Jan. 1996. Footloose Labour: Working in India's informal economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, M. 1988. Thirty years of making out. In Pahl, R. (ed.), On Work: Historical, comparative and theoretical approaches. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. Introduction: Cultures of Relatedness. In Carsten, J. (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness: New approaches to the study of kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan. 1994. The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, S. 2000. The agrarian origins of the knitwear industrial cluster in Tiruppur, India. World Development 28 (3): 579–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Neve, Geert. 1999a. Tamil Warps and Wefts: An anthropological study of urban weavers in South India. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
De Neve, Geert. 1999b. Asking for and giving baki: Neo-bondage, or the interplay of bondage and resistance in the Tamilnadu power-loom industry. In Parry, Jonathan P., et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
De Neve, Geert. 2000. Patronage and ‘community’: the role of a Tamil ‘village’ festival in the integration of a town. The Journal of the Royal Anthropology Institute 6 (3): 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Neve, Geert. 2003. The workplace and the neighbourhood: locating masculinities in the south Indian textile industry. In Chopra, R., Osella, C. and Osella, F.. (eds.), South Asian Masculinities: Context of Change, Sites of Continuity. New Delhi: Kali for Women & Women Unlimited.Google Scholar
Engelshoven, Miranda. 1999. Diamonds and Patels: a report on the diamond industry of Surat. In Parry, Jonathan P., et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Leela. 1997. Producing Workers: The Politics of Gender, Class and Culture in the Calcutta Jute Mills. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gooptu, N. 2001. The Politics of the Urban Poor in Early Twentieth-century India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harriss-White, B. 2003. India Working: Essays on Society and Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, Douglas. 1999. Just like a family? Recalling the relations of production in the textile industries of Surat and Bhiwandi, 1940–1960. In Parry, Jonathan P., et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Holmström, M. 1976. South Indian Factory Workers: Their life and their world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, Roger. 1991. The Limits of Kinship. In Loizos, P. and Papataxiarchis, E.. (eds.), Contested Identities: Gender and Kinship in Modern Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kapadia, K. 1999. Gender ideologies and the formation of rural industrial classes in South India today. In Parry, Jonathan P., et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Knorringa, P. 1999. Artisan labour in the Agra footwear industry: Continued informality and changing threats. In Parry, Jonathan P., et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lambert, Helen. 1996. Caste, Gender and Locality in Rural Rajasthan. In Fuller, C.J.. (ed.), Caste Today. Delhi: OUP.Google Scholar
Lambert, Helen. 2000. Sentiment and substance in North Indian forms of relatedness. In Carsten, J.. (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nair, Janaki. 1998. Miners and Millhands: Work, culture and politics in princely Mysore. New Delhi: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Parry, Jonathan P. 1999. Introduction. In Parry, Jonathan P., et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sen, Samita. 1999a. Women and Labour in Late Colonial India: The Bengal Jute Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Samita. 1999b. Beyond the ‘Working Class’; women's role in Indian industrialisation. In South Asia 22: 2, pp. 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Loop, Theo. 1996. Industrial Dynamics and Fragmented Labour Markets: Construction firms and labourers in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar