Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:42:19.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

War in the Making of Modern China1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Hans J. Van De Ven
Hans J. Van De Ven
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

No one even with only a casual interest in Chinese history can be unaware that China's capacity for war in the last few centuries has proved truly awesome. In the middle of the eighteenth century Qing armies numbering some 150,000 troops marched into central Asia. After many campaigns some of which continued for nearly two years, they rid China finally of the menace from the desert that had caused so much havoc in the past. In the process they exterminated the Zunghars as a people. In the nineteenth century, China fought wars with nearly all the major powers: England in the Opium War of 1839–42 and several times thereafter; France in the 1880s; and Japan in the 1890s. In 1900 it took on all of them at the same time. Civil war too was a frequent occurrence. The Taiping Rebellion of 1852–64 exacted casualties that should be counted in the tens of millions, and this was merely the most devastating of a series of rebellions. The scale of war in the twentieth century has proved even more spectacular. Warlord wars, fighting between the nationalists and communists, and the War of Resistance against Japan ravaged China until the communist victory in 1949.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1996 , pp. 737 - 756
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 For a critical discussion of the contents of the term that places the new scholarship in the history of scholarship on war, see Paret, Peter, ‘The history of war and the new military history,’ in Paret, , Understanding War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), pp. 209–26.Google Scholar

3 Stephen MacKinnon organized the first conference in Tempe, Arizona in 1992. Realizing that researchers in various places were beginning to undertake research on China's military history, he brought many of them together to discuss sources, approaches, and topics. Future workshops and seminars are planned to discuss the history of strategic thought, war and memory, the impact of war on the statebuilding, and battles in modern Chinese history.

4 von Clausewitz, C., On War, tr. Paret, Peter (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1976), Book I, ch. 1 and ch. 7;Google ScholarParet, Peter, ‘Clausewitz: life and thought,’ in Understanding War, pp. 107–17.Google Scholar

5 This approach characterizes what is also a well-researched and nuanced study of the late Qing military, namely Liu, K. C., ‘The military challenge’ in Fairbank, John K. and Liu, Kwang-ching (eds), The Cambridge History of China, vol. 11, part II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), pp. 203–73.Google Scholar

6 Headrick, Daniel, Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), pp. 43–50.Google Scholar

7 McNeill, William, The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D.1000 (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1982), pp. 223–61.Google ScholarHeadrick, Tools of Empire, pp. 43–76. Headrick notes the importance of prophylactic medicines such as quinine without which European soldiers invariably died in the tropics.Google Scholar

8 Qichao, Liang, Xin min shuo (On the renewal of the people) in Yinbinshi congzhu (Collected writings from the Ice Drinker's Studio) (Shanghai, Commercial Press, no date), vol. 1, p. 8.Google Scholar

9 Douglas, , Reynolds, , China: 1898–1912: the Xinzheng Revolution and Japan (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993) provides a comprehensive discussion of the policy changes. For the build-up of the army, seeGoogle ScholarMacKinnon, Stephen, Power and Politics in Late Imperial China: Yuan Shih-k'ai in Beijing and Tienjin, 1901–1908 (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1980), pp. 90–136;Google ScholarFung, Edmund, The Military Dimension of the Chinese Revolution (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1980), pp. 12–86;Google ScholarMcCord, Edward, The Power of the Gun: The Emergence of Modern Chinese Warlordism (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993), pp. 17–45;Google ScholarPowell, Ralph, The Rise of Chinese Military Power (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1955).Google Scholar

10 Leonard, Jane K., Wei Yuan and China's Rediscovery of the Maritime World (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984), pp. 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 On the Chinese navy, see Spector, Stanley, Li Hung-chang and the Huai Army (Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1964), pp. 181–94.Google Scholar

12 Maomao, Deng, Deng Xiaoping, My Father (New York: Basic Books, 1995), pp. 401–2. Verification by independent archival research is not now possible, but will need to take place before Deng Maomao's suggestion can be accepted as accurate. The manoeuvres of the Second Front Army, however, and especially the dash toward the Dabie Mountains suggest that the Chinese communists did see the situation as requiring audacious measures.Google Scholar

13 Levine, Stephen, Anvil of Victory (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), pp. 123–74.Google Scholar

14 On the political consequences for the Opium War, see Polachek, James, The Inner Opium War (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992). On the consequences of the Allied Expedition, see my article in this issue. On the reform movement itself, see Reynolds, China: 1898–1912.Google Scholar

15 Waldron, Arthur, ‘War and the rise of Chinese nationalism,’ in Journal of Military History, vol. 57 (10 1993), pp. 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Wilbur, Martin, The Nationalist Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

17 van de Ven, Hans, From Friend to Comrade (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), pp. 147–98.Google Scholar

18 Keegan, John, The Face of Battle (London: Pimlico, 1976) discusses strategy, tactics, and various experiences of three great battles in European history, namely Agincourt (1415), Waterloo (1815), and the Somme (1915). It is a splendid example of what battle history can be.Google Scholar

19 A sophisticated discussion of the modernization of warfare especially during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that provides a lucid synthesis with many fresh insights is McNeill, , Pursuit of Power, pp. 117–306. Valuable for its concise overviews of technological developments and the actual wars in Europe and the United States isGoogle ScholarAddington, Larry, The Patterns of War since the Eighteenth Century (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994, 2nd edition).Google Scholar An old and still very useful classic, first published in 1920, is Delbrück, Hans, The Dawn of Modern Warfare: History of the Art of War, vol. 4 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1990).Google Scholar

20 McNeill, , Pursuit of Power, pp. 161–6; Addington, , Patterns of War, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar

21 McNeill, , Pursuit of Power, pp. 185–206; Addington, , Patterns of War, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar

22 McNeill, , pp. 223–306; Addington, , pp. 48–101.Google Scholar

23 Howard, Michael, The Franco-Prussian War (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1961).Google ScholarOn the impact in Europe, see Addington, , Patterns of War, pp. 102–5.Google Scholar

24 See Addington, , Patterns of War, pp. 102–5.Google Scholar For a discussion of how Russia approached the post-Franco-Prussian War situation, see Fuller, William C., Strategy and Power in Russia, 1600–1914 (New York: The Free Press, 1992), pp. 328–93.Google Scholar

25 See Ralston, David, Importing the European Army: The Introduction of European Military Techniques and Institutions in the Extra-European World, 1600–1914 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), pp. 114–72 for a preliminary discussion of the impact of army modernization in China and Japan.Google Scholar

26 See for instance Xunlian caofa xiangxi tu shuo (Detailed and illustrated manual for military training and drill) in Shi Duqiao et al., (eds), Zhongguo bingshu jicheng (Collection of Chinese military writings) (Peking, PLA Press, 1992), vol. 50. The manual was issued in 1899; Ziqiang jun xifa lei bian (Western methods of the Selfstrengthening Army, arranged by topic) in Ibid., vol. 49. First published in 1898. A new manual, the Xinding bubing caufa (New drill manual for the infantry) was translated from the Japanese and published in 1910. See Guo Rugui et al., (eds), Zhongguo junshishi: Disi juan: bingfa (Military history of China: vol. 4: tactics, Peking: PLA Press, 1988), p. 425.

27 On German influence, see Ratenhof, Udo, Die China Politik des Deutschen Reiches, 1871–1945 (Boppard am Rhein: Boldt, 1987);Google ScholarQingdai dang'an ziliao congbian, vol. 10, pp. 221–90;Google ScholarRugui, Guo et al. (eds), Zhongguo junshishi: Disi juan: bingfa, vol. 4, pp. 412–25;Google ScholarKirby, William, Germany and Republican China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1983) notes that Wang Tao wrote a book on the Franco-Prussian War that shocked the Self-Strengthening establishment and led to the use of German advisors both by Yuan Shikai and Zhang Zhidong as well as the purchase of new equipment including from the Krupp factories.Google Scholar

28 McCord, , The Power of the Gun. See my article in this issue for an initial exploration of the fiscal background.Google Scholar

29 Chen-ya, Tien, Chinese Military Theory (Stevenage, SPA Books, 1992), pp. 105–18.Google Scholar

30 Fung, Military Dimension, pp. 114–229.Google Scholar

31 Schwartz, Benjamin, ‘Themes in intellectual history: May Fourth and after,’ in Fairbank, John K. (ed.), The Cambridge History of China vol. 12, Part I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 408–18.Google Scholar

32 Fussell, Paul, War and Modern Memory (London: Oxford University Press, 1975), p. 315.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., pp. 315–20.

34 Some examples of the new genre are Huaidan, Ran and Haiyan, Zhu, Beifang you zhanhuo (The smoke of war in the north) (Peking: PLA Press, 1993);Google ScholarQingping, Guo and Yuanshang, Xu, Baituan Dazhan (The hundred regiments offensive) (Peking: PLA Press, 1993);Google ScholarDikang, Wang et al. , Disi yezhanjun nanzheng jishi (The southern campaign of the Fourth Field Army) (Peking: PLA Press, 1993);Google ScholarYubin, Wang and Suhong, Wang, Dashi zhongyuan (Battles on the central plains) (Peking: PLA Press 1993).Google Scholar

35 Weili, Wang, ‘Kang-Ri zhanzheng zhong de Guo-Gong guanxi yu Zhongguo zhengzhi qiantu’ (The relationship between the CCP and the KMT during the Period of the Anti-Japanese war and subsequent Chinese politics). Third international symposium on the history of Republican China, Nanjing, December 1994.Google Scholar

36 See the articles by Peter Perdue and Joanna Waley-Cohen in this issue.

37 Bartlett, Beatrice, Monarchs and Ministers: the Grand Council in mid-Ch'ing China, 1723–1820 (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1991), p. 266.Google Scholar

38 See Zelin, Madeleine, The Magistrate's Tael (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), pp. 246ff. on attempts at reforms of the land registration system in eighteenth-century China.Google Scholar

39 McNeill, , Pursuit of Power, pp. 98–9.Google Scholar See also Frederic Wakeman, J., The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-Century China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), pp. 75–82, 168–70. The Ming was able at first to exploit European artillery technology to create defences that the Manchus were not able to breach. But the capture of artillery troops and experts by the Qing and their own acquisition and manufacture of European cannon changed the balance of forces decisively. The Qing also depended on their great cavalry speed.Google Scholar See also Zhenfu, Wei et al. , Zhongguo junshishi: diyijuan: Bingqi (Military history of China: vol. I: weapons) (Peking: PLA Press, 1983), pp. 129–35.Google Scholar

40 McNeill, , Pursuit of Power, pp. 95–8.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., pp. 98–9. For the technological, industrial, and managerial developments that were basic to the rise of the Muscovite empire, see Fuller, Strategy and Power in Russia, 1600–1914, pp. 23–5, 56–84.

42 Paret, ‘The new military history,’ in Understanding War, p. 222.Google Scholar

43 Fairbank, , ‘Introduction,’ in Kierman, Frank and Fairbank, John (eds), Chinese Ways in Warfare (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974), p. 1.Google Scholar