Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:59:13.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sikhs, Congress, and the Unionists in British Punjab, 1937–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Stephen Oren
Stephen Oren
Affiliation:
Wheaton College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The period from 1937 to 1946, between the first and second elections to provincial legislatures held in British India under the 1935 Government of India Act, is one of great interest in Indo-Pakistani history. This was the period of ‘if only,’ the period in which it is still possible to imagine an unpartitioned South Asia.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , May 1974 , pp. 397 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the discussion of the Punjab's population in Ambedkar, B. K., Pakistan or the Partition of India (Bombay, Thacker and Co., Ltd, 1946), p. 429.Google Scholar

2 In essence, the Sikhs had demanded that Sikh shrines and temples be placed under a democratically elected body of Sikhs, the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee. For discussions of Sikh history, including this episode, see Archer, J. C., The Sikhs: a study in Comparative Religion (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1941);Google ScholarSingh, Khushwant, The Sikhs (London, George Allen and Unwin, Ltd, 1953);Google Scholar and the second volume of the same author's A History of the Sikhs (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar For a contemporary Sikh account of the Gurdwara struggle see ‘Sat Sri Akal’, The Gurdwara Reform Movement and the Sikh Awakening (Jullundar, Desh Sewak Book Agency, 1923?).Google Scholar

3 Puri, Mukand Lal, in Punjab: Punjab Legislative Assembly, Debates, V:3 (23 06 1938), p. 119. This source is hereafter cited as Assembly Debates.Google Scholar

4 Nayar, B. R., Contemporary Political Leadership in the Punjab (Chicago, University of Chicago Ph.D. Dissertation, microfilmed, 1963), p. 242.Google Scholar

5 Singh, Swarup, The Sikhs Demand their Homeland! (Lahore, Lahore Book Shop, 1946), p. 35.Google Scholar

6 Chaddha, Tilak Raj, A Study of the Communist Movement in the Punjab (Ghaziabad, Jyoti Parkeshan, 1954), p. 33. Strictly speaking, there was no Communist Party in the Punjab but three or more illegal Communist groups. These five were Communist members of the Congress Socialist Party.Google Scholar

7 Singh, Kabul, in Assembly Debates, X:7 (3 11 1939), p. 501.Google Scholar

8 Chadda, , op. cit., p. 35.Google Scholar

9 Nayar, , op. cit., p. 243.Google Scholar

10 The Statesman, 30 May 1940, p. 9.Google Scholar

11 Nayar, , op. cit., p. 383.Google Scholar

12 Husain, Azim, Fazl-i-Husain (Bombay, Orient Longmans, 1 & 46), p. xi.Google Scholar

13 Moon, Penderal, Divide and Quit (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1962), p. 32.Google Scholar

14 The Statesman, 12 December 1938, p. 20.Google Scholar

15 The Statesman, 7 September 1939, p. 12.Google Scholar

16 Tara, R. L. Khadil, ‘Sir Gokal Chand Narang’, in Sen, N. B., Punjab's Eminent Hindus (Lahore, New Book Society, 1944), p. 75.Although the eleven Hindu Electoral Board members are listed in Table I as government supporters, the figure seems to include some followers of Narang who should be listed with the opposition.Google Scholar

17 The Statesman, 18 June 1936, p. 9.Google Scholar

18 Puri, Mukand Lal, in Assembly Debates, V:4 (24 06, 1938). Puri, the economic affairs expert of the urban Hindus, agreed that the Pathans were an exception but said that they used a stick, not the courts to recover their debts.Google Scholar

19 Puri, Mukand Lal, in Assembly Debates, V:3 (23 06 1938), p. 123.Google Scholar

20 Bhargava, G. C., in Assembly Debates, V:11 (6 07 1938), p. 721.Google Scholar

21 Singh, Kartar, in Assembly Debates, V:16 (14 07 1938), p. 1296.Google Scholar

22 Vidyat, Santokh Singh, ‘The Winner of India's First Decisive Battle for Freedom’, in Baba Kharak Singh Abhindandan Granth: 86 Birthday Commemoration Volume (Mookerji, R. K. ed.), (New Delhi, Baba Kharak Singh Abhindandan Committee, 1953), p. 206.Google Scholar

23 Josh, Sohan Singh, in Assembly Debates, V:19 (18 07 1938), p. 1355.Google Scholar

24 Singh, Ajit, in Assembly Debates, V:16 (14 07 1938), p. 1285.Google Scholar

25 Majithia, Sundar Singh, in Assembly Debates, V:13 (23 06 1938), p. 115.Google Scholar

26 See vote in Assembly Debates, V:15 (12 07 1938), p. 1055.Google Scholar

27 Singh, Santokh, in Assembly Debates, V:4 (24 06 1938), p. 253.Google Scholar

28 The Statesman, 3 11 1938, p. 20.Google Scholar

29 Bhardwag, M. L., ‘Sir Manohar Lal’, in Sen, op. cit., p. 200.Google Scholar

30 Khan, Sikander Hayat, in Assembly Debates, X:8 (6 11 1939), p. 588.Google Scholar

31 See Assembly Debates, X:7 (3 11 1939), passim.Google Scholar

32 Hari Chand, in Ibid., p. 496.

33 Chand, Faqir, in Assembly Debates, X:8 (6 11 1939), p. 560.Google Scholar

34 Singh, Gurbachan, in Assembly Debates, X:7 (3 11 1939), p. 471.Google Scholar

35 The Khalsa, 9 September 1946, p. 3.Google Scholar

36 Moon, , op. cit., p. 32.Google Scholar

37 Singh, Gopal, in Assembly Debates, X:7 (3 11 1939), p. 517.Google Scholar

38 Nayar, , op. cit., pp. 74, 78.Google Scholar

39 Mahmood, Maqbal, in Assembly Debates, X:7 (3 11 1939), p. 4.Google Scholar

40 Vidyat, , op. cit., p. 209.Google Scholar

41 Singh, Sampuran, in Assembly Debates, X:7 (3 11 1939).Google Scholar

42 Kabul Singh in Ibid., p. 513. Sikander called him ‘Moscow’ Singh (Assembly Debates, X:8 (6 11 1939), p. 586).Google Scholar

43 Singh, Santokh in Assembly Debates, X:7 (3 11 1939), p. 501.Google Scholar

44 The Statesman, 19 October 1939, p. 3, is one example.Google Scholar

45 Moon, , op. cit., p. 33.Google Scholar

46 Singh, Durlab, op. cit., p. 130.Google Scholar

47 Singh, Gurbachan and Gyani, Lal Singh, The Idea of the Sikh State (Lahore, Lahore Book Shop, 1946), p. 8.Google Scholar

48 Nayar, , op. cit., p. 132.Google Scholar

49 The Statesman, 25 March 1937, p. 5.Google Scholar

50 Khalsa Nationalist conference, in Mitra, N. N., The Indian Annual Register, 1940, 1, p. 257.Google Scholar

51 The Statesman, 18 April 1940, p. 11.Google Scholar

52 The Statesman, 30 May 1940, p. 9.Google Scholar

53 Nayar, , op. cit., p. 125.Google Scholar

54 The Statesman, 4 January 1940, p. 14.Google Scholar

55 Singh, Jaswant, ‘Letter to the Editor’, The Statesman, 18 April 1940, p. 5.Google Scholar

56 The Statesman, 13 June 1940, p. 5.Google Scholar

57 Greimal, Gurdev Singh, ‘Letter to the Editor’, The Statesman, 5 September 1940, p. 2.Google Scholar

58 The Statesman, 11 July 1940, p. 11.Google Scholar

59 Shiromani Akali Dal Conference, in Mitra,op. cit., 1940, I, p. 351.Google Scholar

60 The Statesman, 12 September 1940, p. 5.Google Scholar

61 The Statesman, 19 September 1940, p. 5. The Sikh position was that while India was entitled to independence, and to demonstrate for that independence, the British must be supported in the war since, if they lost, India would also lose.Google Scholar

62 The Statesman, 24 October 1940, p. 5.Google Scholar

63 Ajit Singh speech at Akali Political Conference in Mitra,op. cit., 1940, II, p. 320.Google Scholar

64 The Statesman, 14 November 1940, p. 6. Sikander, himself the first Indian to command an army company under fire, may have especially resented this since his own ‘mercenary’ son was a German P.O.W.Google Scholar

65 The Statesman, 12 December 1940, p. 10.Google Scholar

66 The Statesman, 26 December 1940, p. 5.Google Scholar

67 Assembly Debates, XIV:3 (19 11 1940), p. 82.Google Scholar

68 The Statesman, 19 September 1940, p. 10.Google Scholar

69 Singh, Lal, in Assembly Debates, XIV:13 (9 12 1940), p. 915. Unlike the Alkalis, Congress was boycotting the Punjab Assembly.Google Scholar

70 Sikander Hayat Khan, in ibid., p. 909.

71 Mal, Saraj, in Assembly Debates, XVI:5 (6 03 1941), p. 185.Google Scholar

72 Singh, Durlab, op. cit., p. 135.Google Scholar

73 Narang, Gokal Chand, in Assembly Debates, XVI:5 (6 03 1941), pp. 154 ff. He also noted that the educational bill was a violation of the status quo, since a 1917 education act had given Hindi and Gurumukhi official status for some educational purposes.Google Scholar

74 The Statesman, 23 January 1941, p. 9.Google Scholar

75 The Statesman, 6 February 1941, p. 12.Google Scholar

76 Moon, , op. cit., pp. 20–21.Google Scholar

77 Khan, Sikander Hayat, in Assembly Debates, XVI:8 (11 03 1941), pp. 348–362.Google Scholar

78 The Statesman, 7 April 1941, p. 3.Google Scholar

79 Khan, Sikander Hayat, in Assembly Debates, XVI:8 (11 03 1941), p. 348.Google Scholar

80 Das, Lala Gopal, in Assembly Debates, XVIII:14 (26 02 1942), p. 687.Google Scholar

81 Harmam Singh, in ibid., p. 701.

82 Ram Sharma, in ibid., p. 710.

83 Sikander Hayat Khan, in ibid., p. 694.

84 Sikh All-Parties Convention, ‘Letter to Stafford Cripps’, in United Kingdom: House of Commons, Parliamentary Papers 1941–42, VIII (Accounts and Papers IV), Cmd. 6350 ‘Lord Privy Seal's Mission’, pp. 24–7.Google Scholar

85 Singh, Kharak, speech to Central Akali Dal, in Mitra, op. cit., 1942, I, p. 399.Google Scholar

86 The Statesman, 17 April 1941, p. 3.Google Scholar

87 Singh, Durlab, op. cit., p. 22.Google Scholar

88 The Statesman, 7 May 1942, p. 10.Google Scholar

89 The Statesman, 14 August 1941, p. 7. The Akalis wished to criticize Sikander, who was at this time a member of the Viceroy's Executive Council, for not having pressed the claim of the Sikhs to a member with sufficient vigor, if at all.Google Scholar

90 The Statesman, 30 January 1941, p. 14.Google Scholar

91 The Statesman, 25 June 1942, p. 7.Google Scholar

92 Mitra, , op. cit., 1942, II, p. 342.Google Scholar

93 The Statesman, 9 July 1942, p. 10.Google Scholar

94 Mitra, , op. cit., 1942, I, p. 330.Google Scholar

95 Nayar, , op. cit., p. 245.Google Scholar

96 Kharak Singh, speech to All-India Akhand Hindustan Conference, in Mitra,op. cit., 1943, I, p. 295.Google Scholar

97 The Statesman, 3 December 1942, p. 5. It is important to note that the term ‘Akali’ or ‘Akali Dal’, unless modified, refers to this organization in this paper.Google Scholar

98 The Statesman, 27 August 1942, p. 6.Google Scholar

99 The Statesman, 26 November 1942, p. 14.Google Scholar

100 The Statesman, 28 August 1941, p. 7.Google Scholar

101 The Statesman, 31 December 1942, p. 5.Google Scholar

102 Punjab Pan-Hindu Conference Proceedings, in Mitra,op. cit., 1943, I, p. 270.Google Scholar

103 Anti-Azad Punjab Conference Proceedings, in Mitra,op. cit., 1943, II, p. 301.Google Scholar

104 Overstreet, G. D. and Windmiller, M., Communism in India (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1959), p. 209.Google Scholar

105 Akhand Hindustan Conference Proceedings, in Mitra,op. cit., 1943, II, p. 302.Google Scholar

106 The Statesman, 11 February 1943, p. 13.Google Scholar

107 Tara Singh at Shiromani Akali Dal Conference, in Mitra,op. cit., 1943, I, p. 297.Google Scholar

108 Tara Singh at Shiromani Akali Dal Conference, in Mitra,op. cit., 1943, II, p. 301.Google Scholar

109 The Statesman, 20 July 1944, p. 7.Google Scholar

110 The Statesman, 17 August 1944, p. 10.Google Scholar

111 The Statesman, 14 September 1944, p. 5.Google Scholar

112 The Statesman, 7 September 1944, p. 10.Google Scholar

113 All-Parties Sikh Conference Proceedings, in Mitra,op. cit., 1944, II, p. 310.Google Scholar

114 Central Akali Dal Conference Proceedings,Google Scholar in Ibid., p. 214.

115 The Statesman, 31 August 1944, p. 10.Google Scholar

116 Progressive Akali Dal Conference Proceedings, in Mitra,op. cit., 1944, II, p. 215.Google Scholar

117 The Statesman, 10 August 1944, p. 12.Google Scholar

118 The Statesman, 31 August 1944, p. 11.Google Scholar

119 Ibid., p. 12.

120 The Statesman, 5 October 1944, p. 7.Google Scholar

121 The Statesman, 11 February 1943, p. 10. The fall of North Africa to the Allies had freed Shaukat from a Prisoner of War camp.Google Scholar

122 Moon, , op. cit., p. 37.Google Scholar

123 The Statesman, 25 March 1943, p. 15.Google Scholar

124 The Statesman, 8 July 1943, p. 9.Google Scholar

125 The Statesman, 4 May 1944, p. 13.Google Scholar

126 Khosla, G. D., Stern Reckoning (Bombay, International Book House Ltd, 1948), p. 45.Google Scholar

127 The Statesman, 30 March 1944, p. 7.Google Scholar

128 The Statesman, 4 May 1944, p. 13.Google Scholar

129 The Statesman, 20 April 1944, p. 10.Google Scholar

130 Mitra, , op. cit., 1944, I, p. 229.Google Scholar

131 Khan, Sikander Hayat, in Assembly Debates V:18 (16 07 1938), p. 1318.Google Scholar

132 The Statesman, 11 May 1944, p. 12.Google Scholar

133 The Statesman, 18 May 1944, p. 7.Google Scholar

134 Ibid., p. 12.

135 The Statesman, 6 July 1944, p. 11.Google Scholar

136 The Statesman, 1 June 1944, p. 12.Google Scholar

137 Moon, , op. cit., p. 40.Google Scholar

138 The Statesman, 18 January 1945, p. 2.Google Scholar

139 The Statesman, 12 April 1945, p. 5.Google Scholar

140 Mitra, , op. cit., 1945, I, p. 3.Google Scholar

141 The Statesman, 12 April 1945, p. 5.Google Scholar