Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:48:29.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Secular as Sacred?—The Religio-political Rationalization of B. G. Tilak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Mark J. Harvey
Mark J. Harvey
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Bal Gangadhar Tilak (1856–1920) attempted throughout his public life to mobilize the Indian populace for mass political action. He did this by means of his speeches, journalism, leadership and philosophy. His desire was to throw off the yoke of British colonialism, to deliver his countrymen out of bondage. To this end Tilak sought a cogent and comprehensive, yet distinctly Indian, justification for anti-British pro-Hindu activism. He believed that the divergent sects of India could converge to form ‘a mighty Hindu nation’ if they would only follow the original principles of the Hindu tradition as set forth in such texts as the Rāmāyana and the Bhagavadgītā. And this convergence should be the goal of all Hindus.1 Tilak's interpretations of these texts, especially the Gītā, provided him with his ‘justification’ which rationalized his political work in religious guise.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 321 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, Philip H. 1974. Modem Trends in Hinduism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Brown D., 1958. ‘The Philosophy of Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Karma vs. Jnana in the Gita Rahasya’. Journal of Asian Studies. 02 pp. 197–208.Google Scholar
Cashman, Richard I. 1975. The Myth of the Lokamanya. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ainslie, Embree (ed.). 1966. The Hindu Tradition. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Thomas, Hopkins. 1971. The Hindu Religious Tradition. Encino, California: Dickenson Pub. Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Isvaradatta, (translator). 1930. Ramanuja's Commentary on the Bhagavadgita. Jaspur: Krishnaswamy & Chandrakanath.Google Scholar
Karunakaran, K. P. 1964. Continuity and Change in Indian Politics. New Delhi: People's Publishing House.Google Scholar
Smith, Donald E. 1966. South Asian Politics and Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilak, Bal Gangadhar. 1971. Gita Rahasya or Karma Yoga. Poona: Tilak Brothers.Google Scholar