Article contents
The Political Strategy of Aurobindo Ghosh: The Utilization of Hindu Religious Symbolism and the Problem of Political Mobilization in Bengal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Extract
The nationalist rhetoric of Aurobindo Ghosh and other leaders of the political movement protesting the decision of the Government of British India to partition Bengal province in 1905 contained frequent allusions to Hindu myths and symbols. Militant political leaders primarily drew upon Śakta symbolism, especially the imagery of the Hindu cult of Kālī worship, and they adopted philosophical justifications of nationalism which were based on modernist, Neo-Hindu interpretation of Śaṁkara's Vedānta philosophy. The nation was described as an incarnation of the goddess Kālī, and nationalists were considered her devotees.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980
References
1 Haridas, and Mukherjee, Uma, India's Fight for Freedom: or the Swadeshi Movement, 1905–1906 (Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay, 1958), p. 208.Google Scholar
2 Smith, Donald Eugene, Religion and Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1970), p. 124.Google Scholar
3 Census of India, 1901, as quoted by Broomfield, J. H., Elite Conflict in a Plural Society: Twentieth Century Bengal (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
4 Broomfield, , Elite Conflict, pp. 8, 5–18.Google Scholar
5 Census of India, 1901, as quoted in ibid., pp. 9–10.
6 Seal, Anil, The Emergence of Indian Nationalism: Competition and Collaboration in the Late Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968), p. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 General Report on Public Instruction in Bengal for 1883–1884, as quoted by Seal, ibid., pp. 62–3.
8 Gunderson, Warren, ‘Study VI: Modernization and Cultural Change,’ in Dimock, Edward (ed.), Bengal Literature and History (East Lansing, Michigan: Asian Studies Center, 1967).Google Scholar
9 Sarkar, Jagadish Narayan, ‘Islam in Bengal,’ In Sinha, N. K. (ed.), The History of Bengal, 1757–1905 (Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1967), pp. 574–5.Google Scholar
10 Broomfield, , Elite Conflict, p. 5.Google Scholar
11 Bhattacharya, Jogendra Nath, Hindu Castes and Sects (Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co., 1896), pp. 198–200.Google Scholar
12 Risley, H. H., The Tribes and Castes of Bengal (Calcutta: 1892), Vol. I, p. 442.Google Scholar
13 Zimmer, Heinrich, Myths and Symbols in Indian Art and Civilization (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1946, 1962), pp. 190–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Ibid., p. 215.
15 Chatterjee, Satiscandra and Datta, Dhirendramohan, An Introduction to Indian Philosophy (Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1960), pp. 369–75.Google Scholar
16 For remarks on the Calcutta Municipal Bill, see Sanjivani, June 29, 1899, Report on the Native Papers of Bengal (hereafter referred to as RNPB) (1899), p. 480.Google Scholar For remarks on the Universities Act of 1904 see, Bengalee, February 25, 1904, Report on Native owned English Newspapers in Bengal (hereafter referred to as RNEPB) (1904), p. 109. Hitavarta, November 6, 1904, RNPB (1904), p. 1016. Barisal Hitaishi, April 9, 1904, RNPB (1904), pp. 297–8.
17 Tripathi, Amales, The Extremist Challenge (Calcutta: Orient Longmans, 1967), pp. 144–5;Google ScholarDacca Gazette, October 2, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 994.Google Scholar
18 McLane, J. R., ‘The Decision to Partition Bengal in 1905,’ Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. II, No. 3 (07, 1965), pp. 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Bengalee, July 23, 1905, RNEPB (1905), p. 270.Google Scholar
20 Haridas, and Mukherjee, Uma, India's Fight for Freedom, pp. 45–6.Google Scholar
21 Gazette, Dacca, July 10, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 674.Google Scholar
22 Bengalee, January 14, 1906, RNEPB (1906), p. 23.Google Scholar
23 Haridas, and Mukherjee, Uma, India's Fight for Freedom: or the Swadeshi Movement, 1905–1906, p. 45.Google Scholar
24 Barisal Hitaishi, September 6, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 892.Google Scholar
25 Rowlatt Sedition Report (Calcutta, 1918), p. 71.Google Scholar
26 Haridas, and Mukherjee, Uma, The Origins of the National Education Movement (Calcutta: Calcutta University, 1957), pp. 150–1.Google Scholar
27 Sanjivani, April 19, 1906, RNPB (1906), pp. 355–7.Google Scholar
28 Sandhya, April 19, 1906, RNPB (1906), pp. 355–7;Google ScholarJugantar, April 22, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 398.
29 Ghosh, Aurobindo, ‘The Gospel according to Surendranath,’ Bande Mataram, April 22, 1907.Google Scholar
30 The term ‘Extemist’ may be understood to refer to the faction in the Indian National Congress that espoused militant views, while ‘militant’ is used in this article as a generic term for all those who advocated overthrow of British rule and tactics of confrontation with the administration.
31 Sandhya, September 1, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 822;Google ScholarHindoo Patriot, September 10, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 408.Google Scholar
32 Charu Mihir, September 11, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 862.Google Scholar
33 Singh, P., ‘The Indian National Congress-Surat Split,’ Bengal Past and Present, Vol. LXXXIV, Pt 2, No. 158 (07–12, 1965), pp. 121–39.Google Scholar
34 Ghosh, Aurobindo, Sri Aurobindo on Himself and the Mother (Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1955), pp. 43–4.Google Scholar
35 Rowlatt Sedition Report, Annexure I.
36 Sarkar, Sumit, ‘Trends in Bengal's Swadeshi Movement, Part 1,’ Bengal Past and Present, Vol. LXXXIV, Pt 1, No. 157 (01–06, 1965), pp. 10–39.Google Scholar
37 Sanjivani, January 14, 1909, RNPB (1909), p. 102;Google ScholarHindoo Patriot, December 14, 1908 RNEPB (1908), p. 402.Google Scholar
38 Broomfield, , Elite Conflict, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
39 Purani, A. B., The Life of Sri Aurobindo: A Source Book (Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1964).Google Scholar
40 Indu Prakash, February 5, 1894.Google Scholar
41 Ibid.
42 Indu Prakash, August 7, 1893.Google Scholar
43 Purani, , Life of Aurobindo, p. 56.Google Scholar
44 Ibid., pp. 52–62.
45 Ghosh, Aurobindo, Bankim-Tilak-Dayananda (Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1955), p. 19.Google Scholar
46 Ghosh, Aurobindo, Sri Aurobindo on Himself and the Mother, p. 49.Google ScholarBande Mataram April 15, 1907.
47 Purani, , Life of Aurobindo, pp. 101–2.Google Scholar
48 Ibid., p. 105.
49 Tripathi, Amales, The Extremist Challenge, pp. 131–2.Google Scholar
50 Purani, , Life of Aurobindo, pp. 133–40.Google Scholar
51 Bande Mataram, April 13, 1907.Google Scholar
52 Mukopadhyay, Jadugopal, Biplabi Jibaner Smrti (Memories of Revolutionary Life) (Calcutta: Indian Associated Publishing Co.), p. 96.Google Scholar
53 Gordon, Leonard A., Bengal: The Nationalist Movement, 1876–1940 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974), pp. 110, 112–13.Google Scholar
54 Chatterjee, Bankim Chandra, Anandamath, trans. from Bengali by Aurobindo, and Ghosh, Barindra (Calcutta: Basumati Sahitya Mandir, n.d.).Google Scholar
55 Vivekananda, Swami, ‘Practical Vedanta, Part I’, Complete Works, Vol. II, pp. 291–306.Google Scholar
56 Gambhirananda, Swami, History of the Ramakrishna Math and Mission (Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1957).Google Scholar
57 Bande Mataram, April 23, 1907.Google Scholar
58 Purani, , Life of Aurobindo, pp. 77–82.Google ScholarRowlatt Sedition Report, p. 67.
59 Bande Mataram, March 28, April 7, 1908.Google Scholar
60 Purani, , Life of Aurobindo, p. 80.Google Scholar
61 Ibid., p. 90.
62 With reference to the relation between Aurobindo's political views and his inner conflict over cultural identity, Dr Leonard Gordon remarks: ‘From his first political articles and certainly from the later years at Baroda, it is clear that Aurobindo wanted to purge the foreign elements from within himself and from his country. He saw his individual conflicts writ large in English-Indian relations.’ Gordon, , Bengal: The Nationalist Movement, p. 114.Google Scholar
63 Ibid., p. 128.
64 Bande Mataram, March 25, 1908.Google Scholar
65 Bande Mataram, March 2, 1908.Google Scholar
66 Bande Mataram, May 25, 1907.Google Scholar
67 Bande Mataram, March 19, 1908.Google Scholar
68 Bande Mataram, March 6, 1908.Google Scholar
69 Bande Mataram, April 23, 1907.Google Scholar
70 See Pal, Bipin, Memories of My Life and Times, Vol. II (Calcutta: Yugayatri Prakashak, 1951).Google Scholar
71 See, for example, Pal, Bipin, The Soul of India (Calcutta: Choudhury and Choudhury, 1911),Google Scholar and Pal, Bipin, Europe Asks: Who is Sri Krishna? (Calcutta: The New India Printing and Publishing Co., 1939).Google Scholar
72 New India, June 6, 1907,Google Scholar as cited in Ker, James Cambell, Political Trouble in India, 1907–1917 (confidential report) (Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, 1917), pp. 46–7.Google Scholar
73 Ibid.
74 Pal, Bipin, ‘The New Movement’, Swadeshi and Swaraj (Calcutta: Yugayatri Prakashak, 1954), pp. 117–48.Google Scholar
75 Ghosh, Aurobindo, ‘A Great Message’, Bande Mataram, 03 12, 1908.Google Scholar
76 Ghosh, Aurobindo, Sri Aurobindo on Himself and the Mother, pp. 51–2.Google Scholar
77 Ker, , Political Trouble in India, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
78 Gordon, , Bengal: The Nationalist Movement, p. 123.Google Scholar
79 Rowlatt Sedition Report, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
80 Jugantar, July 22, 1907, RNPB (1907), pp. 724–5.Google Scholar
81 Jugantar, June 16, 1907,Google Scholar as translated in Ghosh, Kali Charan, The Roll of Honour: Anecdotes of Indian Martyrs (Calcutta: Vidya Bharati, 1965), p. 138.Google Scholar
82 Jugantar, August 12, 1907, in ibid., pp. 110–11.
83 Jugantar, March 26, 1907, in ibid., p. 104.
84 Jugantar, June 23, 1907, in ibid., p. 108.
85 Rowlatt Sedition Report, Annexure I, p. ix.
86 Jugantar, November 2, 1907, in Ghosh, Kali Charan, Roll of Honour, pp. 101–2.Google Scholar
87 Majumdar, B. B., Militant Nationalism in India (Calcutta: General Printers and Publishers, 1966), p. 200.Google Scholar
88 Rowlatt Sedition Report, pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
89 Ibid., p. 71; Ker, , Political Trouble in India, pp. 156–7.Google Scholar
90 Rowlatt Sedition Report, p. 190.Google Scholar
91 Chatterji, Jogesh, In Search of Freedom (Calcutta: K. L. Mukhopadhyay, 1967), p. 25.Google Scholar
92 Ibid.
93 Ibid., p. 27.
94 Bengalee, January 14, 1906, RNEPB (1906), p. 23.Google Scholar
95 Haridas, and Mukherjee, Uma, India's Fight for Freedom, p. 38.Google Scholar
96 Navayug, November 18, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 117.Google Scholar
97 Daily Hitavadi, November 6, 1905, RNPB (1905), pp. 1056–7.Google Scholar
98 Rowlatt Sedition Report, p. 71.Google Scholar See also quote from the ‘Administration Report of the Government of East Bengal and Assam,’ in Sanjivani, April 23, 1909, RNPB (1909), p. 492.
99 Rowlatt Sedition Report, Annexure 2, p. x.Google Scholar
100 Amrita Bazar Patrika, October 13, 1904, RNEPB (1904), p. 483.Google Scholar
101 Dacca Gazette, January 18, 1904, RNPB (1904), p. 108.Google Scholar
102 Dacca Gazette, January 18, 1904, RNPB (1904), p. 109.Google Scholar
103 Sanjivani, August 24, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 850.Google Scholar
104 Sandhya, April 25, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 432.Google Scholar
105 New India, August 26, 1906.Google Scholar
106 Amrita Bazar Patrika, July 11, 1907.Google Scholar
107 Bengalee, August 3, 1907, RNEPB (1907), p. 334;Google ScholarAmrita Bazar Patrika, June 30, 1906, RNEPB (1906), p. 48.Google Scholar
108 Sanjivani, October 5, 1905, as cited in Haridas and Uma Mukherjee, India's Fight for Freedom, p. 235.Google Scholar
109 Sandhya, October 20, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 1019.Google Scholar
110 Hitavarta, December 24, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 12.Google Scholar
111 Mihir o Sudhakar, June 14, 1907, RNPB (1907), pp. 566–8.Google Scholar
112 Indian Empire, December 5, 1906, RNEPB (1906), p. 520.Google Scholar
113 Rowlatt Sedition Report, Annexure 2, p. x.Google Scholar
114 Ibid., pp. 15, 71; Chatterji, Jogesh, In Search of Freedom, p. 25.Google Scholar
115 Sandhya, August 5, 1908, RNPB (1908), p. 1485.Google Scholar
116 Hitavadi, September 24, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 963.Google Scholar
117 Hitavata, September 9, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 832.Google Scholar
118 Bengalee, October 14, 1905, RNEPB (1905), p. 373.Google Scholar
119 Daily Hitavadi, January 9, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 29.Google Scholar
120 Bhattacharya, Jogendranath, Hindu Castes and Sects, pp. 198–9.Google Scholar
121 Sarkar, Sumit, ‘Trends in Bengal's Swadeshi Movement, 1903–1908,’ Bengal Past and Present, Vol. LXXXIV, Part II, No. 158 (07–12 1965), p. 151.Google Scholar
122 Mihir o Sudhakar, June 22, 1900. RNPB (1900), p. 494.Google Scholar
123 Indian Mirror, May 17, 1901, RNEPB (1901), p. 336.Google ScholarMihir o Sudhakar, June 14, 1907, RNPB (1907), p. 566–8.
124 Mihir o Sudhakar, July 14, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 697.Google ScholarMoslem Chronicle, August 5, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 294.
125 Mihir o Sudhakar, August 11, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 801.Google Scholar
126 Mihir o Sudhakar, May 31, 1907, RNPB (1907), p. 512.Google Scholar
127 Mihir o Sudhakar, January 19, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 82.Google Scholar
128 Indian Empire, December 5, 1906, RNEPB (1906), p. 520.Google Scholar
129 Sanjivani, December 20, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 1154.Google Scholar
130 Charu Mihir (Mymensingh), June 12, 1906, RNPB (1906), p. 539.Google Scholar
131 Mihir o Sudhakar, March 15, 1907, RNPB (1907), p. 248.Google Scholar
132 Soltan, April 19, 1907, RNPB (1907), pp. 336–7.Google ScholarDaily Hitavadi, April 30, 1907, RNPB (1907), p. 365.Google ScholarMihir o Sudhakar, May 3, 1907, RNPB (1907), p. 389.Google Scholar
133 Bande Mataram, March 12, 1907, RNEPB (1907), p. 78.Google Scholar
134 Rowlatt Sedition Report, Annexure 2, p. x.Google Scholar
135 Jasohar, April 19, 1908, RNPB (1908), p. 750.Google Scholar For a similar demand by a low caste, see Sanjivani, April 9, 1908, RNPB (1908), p. 751.Google Scholar
136 Tripura Hitaishi, February 19, 1901, RNPB (1901), p. 153.Google Scholar
137 Kasipur Nivasi, April 5, 1905, RNPB (1905), p. 362.Google Scholar
138 Mihir o Sudhakar, June 5, 1908, RNPB (1908), p. 1114.Google Scholar
139 Khulnavasi, June 20, 1908, RNPB (1908), p. 1209.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by