Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:17:53.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models and Realities: Malaysian National Planning and East Malaysian Development Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Victor T. King
Victor T. King
Affiliation:
University of Hull
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper my main empirical data are taken from the East Malaysian state of Sarawak, but much of what I say applies equally to the other East Malaysian state of Sabah. What is more, my argument is relevant in large part to the southern two-thirds of the island of Borneo—that is, to the four provinces of Indonesian Borneo or Kalimantan. For the purposes of this discussion I have to treat the small, newly independent oil-rich sultanate of Brunei Darussalam on the north-west coast of Borneo as an exception. My general concern is with the peripheral position of the Borneo territories, economically and politically, in relation to the developed core areas of the nation-states of Malaysia and Indonesia. As a result of its environmental and demographic characteristics, its historical experiences under British protection and then colonialism in the north, and Dutch colonialism in the south, and its subsequent post-independence experience, Borneo is admirably suited to perform the role of a natural resources area for the national development programmes of Malaysia and Indonesia (Avé and King, 1986). For Indonesian Borneo there is an additional issue; it is also an area for the resettlement of some of the excess population from the densely populated islands of Indonesia's heartlands, especially from Java and Madura. Fortunately, Malaysian Borneo has no need to fulfil such a role in relation to West Malaysia.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 263 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avé, J. B. and King, V. T. 1986. The People of the Weeping Forest. Tradition and Change in Borneo (Leiden: Rijksmuseum voor Volkenkunde).Google Scholar
Brennan, M. 1985.‘Class, Politics and Race in Modern Malaysia’, in Higgott, R. and Robison, R. (eds), Southeast Asia. Essays in the Political Economy of Structural Change pp. 93–127 (London, etc.: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Cramb, R. A. and Dian, J. 1979. A Preliminary Social and Economic Survey of the National Extension Project in Sarawak: Summary and Conclusions (Kuching: Department of Agriculture, Planning Division, Report no. 14).Google Scholar
Dixon, G. 1972. Rural Settlement in Sarawak (University of Oregon: unpublished Ph.D.thesis).Google Scholar
Fisk, E. K. 1982. ‘Development in Malaysia’, in Fisk, E.K. and Osman-Rani, H. (eds), The Political Economy of Malaysia, pp. 1–23 (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Government of Malaysia. 1966. First Malaysia Plan 1966–1970.Google Scholar
Government of Malaysia. 1971. Second Malaysia Plan 1971–1975.Google Scholar
Government of Malaysia. 1976. Third Malaysia Plan 1976–1980.Google Scholar
Government of Malaysia. 1981. Fourth Malaysia Plan 1981–1985.Google Scholar
Government of Malaysia. 1986. Fifth Malaysia Plan 1986–1990. (Kuala Lumpur: National Printing Department).Google Scholar
Hatch, T. 1982. Shifting Cultivation in Sarawak—A Review (Kuching: Department of Agriculture, Soils Division, Research Branch, Technical Paper No.8).Google Scholar
Hatch, T. and Lim, C.P., 1978. Shifting Cultivation in Sarawak (Kuching: Department of Agriculture).Google Scholar
Humen, G. G. 1981. Native Land Tenure Protection in Sarawak (University of Malaya: unpublished LL.B. Hons thesis).Google Scholar
Jackson, J. C. 1968. Sarawak. A Geographical Survey of a Developing State (London: University of London Press).Google Scholar
Jomo, K. S. 1983. ‘Prospects for the New Economic Policy in Light of the Fourth Malaysia Plan’, in Jomo, K. S. and Wells, R. J. G. (eds), The Fourth Malaysia Plan: Economic Perspectives, pp. 51–61 (Kuala Lumpur: Persatuan Ekonomi Malaysia).Google Scholar
King, V. T. 1986a. ‘Land Settlement Schemes and the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in Sarawak, East Malaysia: A Critical Commentary’, in Wilder, W. D. (eds), Wealth and Poverty in Contemporary Southeast Asia, pp. 71–99 (Singapore: special issue of the Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, vol. 14, no. 1).Google Scholar
King, V. T. 1986b Planning for Agrarian Chang: Hydro-electric Power, Resettlement and Iban Swidden Cultivators in Sarawak, East Malaysia (University of Hull, Centre for South-East Asian Studies: Occasional Papers Series, no. 11).Google Scholar
Yong, Leng Lee. 1968. ‘Land Use in Sarawak’, Sarawak Museum Journal, 16, pp. 282–308.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 1979. ‘Is there Development in Sarawak? Political Goals and Practice’ in Jackson, J. C. and Rudner, M. (eds), Issues in Malaysian Development, pp. 339–74 (Singapore: Heinemann Educational Books (Asia), Asian Studies Associationa of Australia, Southeast Asia Publications Series, no. 3).Google Scholar
Lim, D. 1982–1983. ‘Malaysian Development Planning’, Pacific Affairs, 55, pp. 613–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, D. 1986. ‘East Malaysia in Development Planning’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 17, pp. 156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Lim Min (ed.). 1981. 18 Years in Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah), 1963–1981 (Kuching: Malaysia Timor Publications).Google Scholar
Miri-Bintulu Regional Planning Study. 1974 (London and Copenhagen: Hunting Technical Services and Hoff and Overgaard, Support Report no 4, Sociology).Google Scholar
Munan, S. 1980. ‘Sarawak Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Authority. Briefing Notes’, Sarawak Gazette, 106, no. 1463, pp. 12–15.Google Scholar
Osborn, J. 1978. ‘The Status of Research on Development and Development Policy in Borneo’ in Appell, G. N. and Wright, L. R. (eds), The Status of Social Science Research in Borneo, pp. 104–9 (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, Department of Asian Studies, Southeast Asia Program, Data Paper no. 109).Google Scholar
Robertson, A. F. 1984. People and the State. An Anthropology of Planned Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Studies in Social Anthropology, 52).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarawak. Annual Statistical Bulletins, 1981–1985.Google Scholar
Statistics of External Trade, 1963–1971 (Kuching: Department of Statistics).Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture. Annual Report, 1978 (Kuching: Department of Agriculture).Google Scholar
Wilson, J. K., 1969. Budu or Twenty Years in Sarawak (North Berwick: Tantallon Press).Google Scholar