Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:26:33.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

John K. Fairbank, Historian of Modern China - John Fairbank and the American Understanding of Modern China. By Paul M. Evans. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1988. Pp. xvi, 363.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

T. H. Barrett
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies University of London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fairbank, John K., Chinabound (New York: Harper and Rowe, 1982). Paul M. Evans, John Fairbank and the American Understanding of Modern China.Google Scholar

2 Hodous, L. (ed.), Careers for Students of Chinese Language and Civilization (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1933), p. 56.Google Scholar

3 See, for example, the lecture illustrating the value of Japanese scholarship by Twitchett, D. C., Land Tenure and the Social order in T'ang and Sung China (London: The School of Oriental and African Studies, 1962).Google Scholar

4 Cohen, Paul A., Discovering History in China: American Historical Writing on the Recent Chinese Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984), ch. one.Google ScholarCf. the remarks of Rowe, William T. on Fairbank, in John, Cannon (ed.), Blackwells Dictionary of Historians (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988), p. 127.Google Scholar

5 I have in mind such studies as Dikötter, F., The Discourse of Race in Modern China (London: C. Hurst, 1992).Google Scholar

6 I have in mind such works as Henderson, John B., The Development and Decline of Chinese Cosmology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984)Google Scholar, and Elman, Benjamin A., From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China (Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Thus an essay first published in Life, 23 Sept. 1966, and now to be found inGoogle ScholarChina: The people's Middle Kingdom and the U.S.A. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 316.Google Scholar

8 Fairbank, John King, China Watch (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987), p. vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar This book is primarily a collection of pieces frist published by Fairbank between 1971 and 1985, with some additional comments.

9 Thus Evans, John Fairbank, p. 17, referring both to Fairbank and to Webster.Google Scholar

10 Note e.g. the reference to Webster by Isaiah Friedman on p. 198 of ‘The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence: a Reply to Professor Arnold Toynbee's Comments’, Journal of Contemporary History 5.4 (1970), pp. 193201.Google Scholar

11 This quotation may be found on p. 115 of Herbert Feis, ‘The Modern Far East and the Undergraduate’, in de Bary, W. Theodore and Embree, Ainslee T., Approaches to Asian Civilizations (New York: columbia University Press, 1964), pp. 107–21;Google Scholar Feis responds to Fairbank's lengthy purple passage with the observation (p. 116) ‘Must we really accomplish these feats of understanding? I presume so even though we fail’. Note that the volume as a whole gets under way (p. 3) with Arthur Wright in passing disparaging the wholw concept of history as ‘background’ to current affairs.

12 Chung-yüan, Ling-hu, ‘Fei Cheng-ch'ing yü Chung-kung kuo-shih’, Ming-pao yüeh-k'san 26.10 (10 1991), pp. 43–4.Google Scholar