Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:08:31.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘God must be Liberated!’ A Hindu Liberation Movement in Ayodhya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Peter van der Veer
Peter van der Veer
Affiliation:
Department of Cultural Anthropology, University of Utrecht
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There seem to be at least two elusive concepts in the sociology of India: caste and communalism. On caste Eric Wolf makes the point eloquently: ‘The literature on the topic is labyrinthine, and the reader is not always sure there is light at the end of the tunnel’ (1982: 397). The sociological perspective on caste seems to be obscured by a great deal of confusion about the place of religious values and sentiments in Hindu society. According to Louis Dumont (1970: 6, 7), the primary object of the sociology of India should be a system of ideas and the approach that of a sociology of values. Since the religious ideology, on which the caste system is based in his view, seems to have been fixed already in the classical period of Indian civilization, caste becomes a static, a-historical phenomenon in Dumont's writing and in much of the debate originating from it (cf. Van der Veer 1985). The same may easily happen with that other most elusive concept of the sociology of India, communalism. Again Dumont can be our misleading guide here. He argues that ‘communalism is the affirmation of the religious community as a political group’ (1970: 90). In terms of their religious values and norms there is a lasting social heterogeneity of the Hindu and Muslim communities (95–8). This argument amounts to a ‘two-nation’ theory, based upon an a-historical sociology of values.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 283 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asad, T. 1983. ‘Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz’, Man (n.s.) 18: 237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, H. 1984. ‘Ayodhya’. Ph.D. Dissertation, Groningen.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. 1980. North India between Empires: Awadh, the Mughals and the British, 1720–1801. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Baxter, C. 1966. ‘The Jana Sangh: a brief history’, in: Smith, D. (ed.), South Asian Politics and Religion. Princeton: 74–102.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. 1983. Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars; North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion, 1770–1870. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. 1985. ‘The Pre-history of “Communalism”? Religious Conflict in India, 1700–1860’, Modern Asian Studies, 19, 2: 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, A. S. 1922. The Babumama in English. London.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, G. 1968. Awadh under Wajid Ali Shah. Benares.Google Scholar
Carnegy, P. 1870. A Historical Sketch of Tahsil Fyzabad, Zillah Fyzabad. Lucknow.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1970. Religion, Politics and History in India. The Hague.Google Scholar
Eck, D. 1982. Banaras. City of Light. New York.Google Scholar
Epstein, A. 1978. Ethos and Identity. London.Google Scholar
Forster, W. 1921. Early Travels in India, 1583–1619. London.Google Scholar
Freitag, S. 1980. ‘Sacred Symbol as Mobilizing Ideology: The North Indian Search for a “Hindu Community”’, Comparative Studies in Society and History: 597–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York.Google Scholar
Gould, H. 1966. ‘Religion and Politics in a U.P. Constituency’, in: Smith, D. (ed.): South Asian Politics and Religion. Princeton: 51–74.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Th. 1979. Land, Landlords and the British Raj. Northern India in the Nineteenth Century. Delhi.Google Scholar
Nesfield, J. C. 1885. Brief View of the Caste System of the N.W. Provinces and Ouclh. Allahabad.Google Scholar
Sinha, B. P. 1957. Rambhakti mem Rasik Sampradaya. Balrampur.Google Scholar
Sitaram, L. 1930. Avadh ki jhanki. Prayag.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, P., van der Burg, C. 1986. ‘Pandits, Power and Profit. Religious Organization and the Construction of Identities among Surinamese Hindus’, Ethnic and Racial Studies (in press).Google Scholar
Van der Veer, P. 1984. ‘Structure and Anti-Structure in Hindu Pilgrimage to Ayodhya’, in: Ballhatchett, K. and Taylor, D. (eds), Changing South Asia: Religion and Society. Hong Kong: 59–67.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, P. 1985. ‘Brahmans: Their Purity and their Poverty. On the Changing Values of Brahman Priests in Ayodhya’, Contributions to Indian Sociology (NS), 19, 2: 303–21.Google Scholar
Wolfe, E. 1982. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Yang, A. 1980. ‘Sacred Symbols and Sacred Space in Rural India. Community Mobilization in the “Anti-Cow Killing Riot of 1983”’, Comparative Studies in Society and History: 576–96.Google Scholar