Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:03:09.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Gift of Money: Rearticulating Tradition and Market Economy in Rural West Bengal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

SIRPA TENHUNEN*
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki

Abstract

This article examines the rise of dowry system in Janta, a West Bengali village in the Bankura district, where the dowry payments are a relatively new phenomenon. The oldest generation in Janta had experienced times when no demands for money or other gifts had been made during marriage arrangements, but since the 1950s huge dowry payments have become the central financial transactions in the region. In addition to oral history interviews on dowry practices, I draw from my research on the changes in caste, gender and class relationships in the village. I argue that the dowry payments do not merely represent economic considerations in a class conscious society, but that they reflect a rearticulation of both the tradition and market, of gender, ritual, and class identities, and that paying attention to the multiplicity and local variation of dowry practices provides a key to its understanding.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sources

Agarwal, Bina. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1994.Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, D.Land Reforms and Agriculture: The West Bengal Experience. Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. 38: 113No 9. 2003.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, Dwaipayan. Politics of Middleness: The Changing Character of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in Rural West Bengal (1977–90). In Ben, Rogaly, Barbara, Hariss-White, and Sugata, Bose, eds., Sonar Bangla? Agricultural Growth and Agrarian Change in West Bengal and Bangladesh. New Delhi: Sage Publications. 1999.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. and Berreman, Gerald D. India: Social Anthropology of a Civilization. New Jersey: Prentice-Hals. 1971.Google Scholar
Commander, S. The Jajmani System in North India: An Examination of its Logic and Status Across Two Centuries. Modern Asian Studies. 17: 283311. 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Veena. Marriage among Hindus. In Jain, Devaki (ed.), Indian Women. Government of India Publications. New Delhi. 1975.Google Scholar
Fruzzetti, Lina. The Gift of a Virgin: Women, Marriage, and Ritual in a Bengali Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. 3rd reprint. 1993.Google Scholar
Fuller, C.J. Misconceiving the Grain Heap: A Critique of the Concept of the Indian Jajmani System. In Bloch, M. and Parry, J. (eds.), Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1989.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P.K. and Harris-White, Barbara. A Crisis in the Rice Economy. Frontline. Volume 19. Issue 19. September: 1427. 2002.Google Scholar
Good, Anthony. The Actor and the Act: Categories of Prestation in South India. Man, N.S. 17: 2341. 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, Anthony. The Female Bridegroom: A Comparative Study of Life-Crisis Rituals in South India and Sri Lanka. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1991.Google Scholar
Hershman, Paul. Punjabi Kinship and Marriage. Delhi: Hindustan Publishing. 1981.Google Scholar
Kjan, Mumtaz Ali and Ayesha, Noor. Status of Rural Women in India: A Study of Karnataka. New Delhi: Uppal. 1982.Google Scholar
Leslie, Julia. Dowry, “Dowry Deaths” and Violence against Women: A Journey of Discovery. In Werner, Menski (ed.), South Asians and the Dowry Problem. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications. 1998.Google Scholar
Madan, T.N.Structural Implications of Marriage in North India: Wife-Givers and Wife-Takers among the Pandits of Kashmir. Contributions to Indian Sociology. Vol. 9: 217243. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallick, Ross. 1993. Development Policy of a Communist Government: West Bengal since 1977. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencher, Joan. The Caste system Upside Down. Current Anthropology. 15: 469–94. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OldenburgVeena, Talwar Veena, Talwar. Dowry Murder: The Imperial Origins of a Cultural Crime. Delhi: Oxford University Press. 2003.Google Scholar
Parry, J.Caste and Kinship in Kangra. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1979.Google Scholar
Paul, Madan Chandra. Dowry and Position of Women in India: A Study of Delhi Metropolis. New Delhi: India Publications. 1985.Google Scholar
Piot, Charles. Remotely Global: Village Modernity in West Africa. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press. 1957. [1944]Google Scholar
Ramu, G.N.Family and Caste in Urban India. Vikas: Delhi. 1977.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. Goodbye to Tristes Tropes: Ethnography in the Context of Modern World History. The Journal of Modern History. Volume 65. No 1: 125. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Ursula. Dowry in North India: Its Consequences for Women. In Hirschon, R. (ed.) Women and Property: Women as Property. Croom Helm. London. 1984.Google Scholar
Sheel, Ranjana. The Political Economy of Dowry: Institutionalization and Expansion in North India. Delhi: Manohar. 1999.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M.N.Some Reflections on Dowry. Delhi et al.: Oxford University Press. 1978.Google Scholar
Van Der Veen, Klas. I Give Thee My Daughter – A Study of Marriage and Hierarchy Among the Anavil Brahmins of South Gujarat. Van Gorcum and CO, N.V. Assen. 1972.Google Scholar
Tenhunen, Sirpa. Secret Freedom in the City: Women's Wage Work and Agency in Calcutta. Quebec: World Heritage Press. 2003.Google Scholar
Vatuk, Sylvia. Gifts and Affines in North India. Contributions to Indian Sociology. 9: 155–96. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar