Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:39:11.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnic Revolt, State-Building and Patriotism in Republican China: The 1937 West Hunan Miao Abolish-Military-Land Resist-Japan Uprising

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2011

EDWARD A. McCORD
EDWARD A. McCORD*
Affiliation:
The George Washington University, Suite 503, 1957 E Street NW, Washington DC 20052, USA Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines how an ethnic Miao uprising in West Hunan in 1937 became the site for the interaction of a broad range of competing local, provincial, and national interests. The target of the uprising was a tuntian system formed from confiscated Miao lands in the early nineteenth century to support a military system defending against Miao disturbances. Surviving anachronistically into the twentieth century, the military land rents of this system formed a base for warlord power on Hunan's western frontier. The uprising arose opportunistically in the context of a struggle over the resources of this system between the warlord of West Hunan and a provincial governor whose provincial state-building project sought to end the region's long political autonomy. The uprising consequently drew the attention of Nationalist Party factions who saw it as an opportunity to use the uprising to undermine the provincial governor in the interest of their own centralizing state-building project. Finally, the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War allowed uprising leaders to recast the uprising as a patriotic movement, seeking equality for the Miao of West Hunan by the abolition of the tuntian system and offering the mobilization of uprising forces for service at the front once this goal was achieved. In the end, the uprising functioned as a palimpsest upon which the multiple motivations and desires of its participants, in their broad social, political and personal contexts, were written and overwritten.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , November 2011 , pp. 1499 - 1533
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kinkley, Jeffrey C., The Odyssey of Shen Congwen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987), pp. 240–241Google Scholar.

2 Diamond, Norma, ‘Defining the Miao: Ming, Qing, and Contemporary Views’, in Cultural Encounters on China's Ethnic Frontier, edited by Harrell, Stevan (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995), pp. 93–94Google Scholar; Jenks, Robert D., Insurgency and Social Disorder in Guizhou: The ‘Miao’ Rebellion, 1854–1873 (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994), pp. 30–31Google Scholar.

3 Jones, Susan Mann and Kuhn, Philip A., ‘Dynastic Decline and the Roots of Rebellion’, in Cambridge History of China, vol. 10: Late Ch'ing, 1800–1911, part 1, edited by Twitchett, Denis and Fairbank, John King (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), pp. 132–133Google Scholar; Jenks, Insurgency and Social Disorder, p. 41; Nanpeng, Liu, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang tuntian zhidu yange’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 1Google Scholar; Hunanshengzhi bianzuan weiyuanhui, ed., Hunan jinbainian dashi jishu, vol. 1 of Hunanshengzhi (Changsha: Hunan renmin chubanshe, 1959), p. 679 [Hereafter, HJDJ].

4 Jones and Kuhn, ‘Dynastic Decline’, p. 133.

5 Chunsheng, Ling and Yifu, Rui (Ling Shun-sheng and Ruey Yih-fu), Xiangxi Miaozu diaocha baogao (Shanghai: Shanghai yinshuguan, 1947), pp. 114–115Google Scholar.

6 Jenks, Insurgency and Social Disorder, pp. 50–51, 58–59.

7 Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, p. 1; HJDJ, p. 679; Xihua, Sun, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai yu “getun kangrijun” qiyi shimo’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989): 2Google Scholar.

8 Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, pp. 2–3; Ling and Rui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 115–118; HJDJ, p. 679; Shuncheng, Long and Tuxiang, Peng, ‘Liubi bainian de tunfang zhidu’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989): 15Google Scholar; Xinfu, Wu, ‘Minguo nianjian Xiangxi Miaomin ‘getun’ douzheng’, Hunan wenshi, 39 (1990): 177Google Scholar.

9 Ling and Rui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 119–121; Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, p. 2.

10 Ling and Rui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 123–124; HJDJ, p. 680; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, pp. 2–3; Long and Peng, ‘Liubi bainian’, pp. 16–17.

11 Ling and Rui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 115, 119–121; Long and Peng, ‘Liubi bainian’, p. 17; Kinkley, Odyssey, pp. 13–14.

12 HJDJ, p. 679; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 3. The average rent was around one dan per mu. Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, p. 3; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 177. A dan is a little less than three bushels; a mu is approximately one-sixth of an acre. In 1949, average agricultural production in original tuntian counties was estimated at 213 jin per mu, where one dan is equal to 120 jin. Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 177.

13 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, pp. 3–4.

14 HJDJ, pp. 679–680; Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, p. 3; Long and Peng, ‘Liubi bainian’, p. 17; Yiyu, Luo, ‘Fenghuangxian de Miaozu renmin’, in Jiefanglede zhongnanqu xiongdi minzu (Hankou: Zhongnan renmin chubanshe, 1951), p. 73Google Scholar.

15 HJDJ, p. 680; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 117; Long and Peng, ‘Liubi bainian’, p. 16.

16 HJDJ, p. 680; Long and Peng, ‘Liubi bainian’, p. 15.

17 Ling and Rui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 119–121.

18 Hengliang, Wu, ‘Miao zhou Miao zhong ji’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 164Google Scholar; ‘Xiangxi de tunwu wenti’ [West Hunan's military land affairs problem], Dagongbao (Changsha) 20 February 1938, reprinted in Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 10.

19 HJDJ, p. 680; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 4.

20 See for example, Long and Peng, ‘Liubi bainian’, p. 4, and Hunan sheng difangzhi bianzuan weiyuanhui, ed., Minzuzhi, vol. 24 of Hunanshengzhi (Changsha: Hunan renmin chubanshe, 1998), p. 203 [Hereafter, MZ].

21 Jenks, Insurgency and Social Disorder, pp. 47, 67.

22 Jenks, Insurgency and Social Disorder, pp. 161–162.

23 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 4; MZ, p. 201.

24 Kinkley, Odyssey, p. 17; Shi Honggui, Xiangxi Miaozu kaocha jiyao (n.p., 1936), p. 10.

25 Kinkley, Odyssey, pp. 17–18.

26 Jingji xuehui, ed., Gesheng caizheng shuomingshu, vol. 10 (Beijing, 1915), ‘Hunan quansheng caizheng shoumingshu’, junzhengfei, pp. 3–65.

27 Jitao, Dai, ‘Xinhai geminghoude Xiangxi’, Hunan wenshi ziliao 10 (1978): 83Google Scholar.

28 Yang Xuedong, ‘Xiangxi junfa Chen Quzhen’, unpublished manuscript (Xiangtan University, 1981), pp. 1–7.

29 Wang Shangzhi, ‘Wo suo zhidaode Chen Quzhen’, unpublished manuscript, no. 62–148, Hunan zhengzhi xieshang huiyi, wenshiban (Historical materials office, Hunan political consultative conference), pp. 3–4.

30 Wang Shangzhi, ‘Chen Quzhen’, p. 5.

31 Kinkley, Odyssey, p. 62; Tongchu, Chen, ‘Yixianfu Chen Quzhen’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 2 (1984): 59Google Scholar; Xihua, Sun, ‘Wo suo zhidaode Chen Quzhen’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 4 (1985): 77Google Scholar.

32 Dai Jitao, ‘Xinhai geminghou’, p. 83.

33 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 5.

34 Ling and Rui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 118–119; Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, p. 3; Hanyuan, Liu, Xiangxi tuntian diaocha ji Baxian shixi riji (Taibei: Chengwen chubanshe, 1977), pp. 8a–bGoogle Scholar, 14a–15b, 18a, and 20a.

35 Military land rents declined from an original 150,000 dan of grain to less than 70,000 dan in 1936. Xiangzi, Sheng, ‘Zuijin Hunan de Miaomin kaihua yundong’, Xin Yaxiya. 13:1 (1 January 1937): 55Google Scholar; Ling and Rui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 118–119; Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, pp. 2–3.

36 Wang Shangzhi, ‘Chen Quzhen’, pp. 5–6; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 178; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, pp. 4–5; Shiquan, Song, ‘Geding qianzou’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 11Google Scholar; ‘Xiangxi de tunwu wenti’, p. 10.

37 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 179–180.

38 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 5; Wang Shangzhi, ‘Chen Quzhen’, p. 5; Shi Honggui, Xiangxi Miaozu, p. 11; Chen Tongchu, ‘Yixianfu’, p. 59.

39 Boorman, Howard L., Biographical Dictionary of Republican China (New York: Columbia University Press, 1967–1971), vol. 2, pp. 60–63Google Scholar.

40 McCord, Edward A., ‘Local Militia and State Power in Nationalist China’, Modern China 25, 2 (April 1999): 127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Wang Shangzhi, ‘Guanyu He Jian jiejue Chen Quzhen de jingguo ji Xiangxi getun fan-He de gaishu’, unpublished manuscript, no. 62–167, Hunan zhengzhi xieshang huiyi, wenshiban, pp. 3–5; Chen Tongchu, ‘Yixianfu’, pp. 61–62.

42 Wang Shangzhi, ‘Guanyu He Jian’, pp. 6–12; Chen Tongchu, ‘Yixianfu’, pp. 63–66.

43 Wang Shangzhi, ‘Guanyu He Jian’, pp. 12–13; Sun Xihua, ‘Chen Quzhen’, p. 80; Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, unpublished manuscript, no. 6788, Hunan zhengzhi xieshang huiyi, wenshiban, p. 67; Chen Tongchu, ‘Yixianfu’, p. 67.

44 Wang Shangzhi’, Guanyu He Jian’, p. 13; Sun Xihua, ‘Chen Quzhen’, p. 80; Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, p. 68.

45 Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, p. 68.

46 Chen Tongchu, ‘Yixianfu’, p. 68; Song Shiquan, ‘Geding qianzou’, pp. 11–12.

47 Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, pp. 69–70; ‘Getun dashiji’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 135; Song Shiquan, ‘Geding qianzou’, p. 12; Sheng Xiangzi, ‘Zuijin Hunan’, p. 55.

48 The ‘surplus’ was estimated at between 22,000–26,000 dan of grain, out of total collection of 65,000 dan. Sheng Xiangzi, ‘Zuijin Hunan’, pp. 55–56, 61.

49 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 181; Song Shiquan, ‘Geding qianzou’, p. 12; Sheng Xiangzi, ‘Zuijin Hunan’, p. 61.

50 Tongxiang, Liu, ‘Luxi kangtun’, Luxi wenshi ziliao 1 (1985): 44–45Google Scholar; Liu Hanyuan, Xiangxi tuntian, p. 30a–b; Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, p. 71.

51 Song Shiquan, ‘Geding qianzou’, p. 11.

52 Shanshu, Liu, ‘Getun douzhengzhongde Liang Mingyuan’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 3 (1984): 32Google Scholar; Hanfu, Huang, ‘Tunwujun lesuo qingkuang diandi’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 9Google Scholar. Huang Hanfu was Song Lianquan's officer in charge of military supplies in this period.

53 Song Shiquan, ‘Geding qianzou’, pp. 12–13; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 181; Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, p. 71. Cheng mistakenly identifies Song Lianquan as Wu Yuanquan.

54 Song Shiquan, ‘Geding qianzou’, p. 12.

55 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 181.

56 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, pp. 181–182; Shiquan, Song, ‘Geding qianzou’, p. 13; Song Shiquan, ‘“Yongsuixian jiechu tunzu suyuantuan” shimo’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 15–16Google Scholar.

57 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 182; Song Shiquan, ‘Geding qianzou’, p. 13; ‘Getun dashiji’, p. 136.

58 Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, pp. 14–15.

59 Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, pp. 14–15; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, 182–183; Shanshu, Liu, ‘Getun lingxiu Wu Hengliang’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 2 (1984): 149–151Google Scholar. Two petition group pronouncements are appended to Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, pp. 18–21.

60 One proposal for Miao cultural advancement, for example, encouraged, among other things, teaching the Miao to speak Chinese and to give up ‘improper’ customs. Shi Honggui, Xiangxi Miaozu, pp. 23–27; Sheng Xiangzi, ‘Zuijin Hunan’, pp. 58–61.

61 Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, p. 20.

62 Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, p. 16; ‘Getun dashiji’, p. 136.

63 ‘Hunan zhengfu bugao’, Dagongbao, 11 November 1936, reprinted in Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 21; Sheng Xiangzi, ‘Zuijin Hunan’, p. 62.

64 ‘Getun dashiji’, pp. 135–136; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 183; Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, p. 16.

65 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 183; Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, p. 16.

66 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 183.

67 ‘Getun dashiji’, p. 136.

68 Song Shiquan, ‘Yongsuixian’, pp. 16–17.

69 Laobao, Shi, ‘Longtan shouyi’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 25–32Google Scholar; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 184.

70 Changhai, Wu, ‘Paidafang de getun haohan’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989), pp. 77–78Google Scholar.

71 Shanfeng, Chang, ‘Mudu Liang Mingyuan sha Chang Jian’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 36–38Google Scholar; Liu Shanshu, ‘Liang Mingyuan’, pp. 32–34; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 184; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, pp. 7–8.

72 Bangben, Liu, ‘Getun canmou Zhang Mengjie’, Huayuan wenshi ziliao 3 (1988): 95Google Scholar.

73 Bangben, Shi, ed., ‘Getunjun zhongde Tujiazu gugan: Dong Ping’, Huayuan wenshi ziliao 3 (1988): 92Google Scholar.

74 Liu Shanshu, ‘Wu Hengliang’, p. 151.

75 Zhenyi, Li, Hunan de xibei jiao (Changsha: Yuzhou shuju, 1947), p. 33Google Scholar. For an example of one such ‘local hero’, see Jingxing, Peng and Tingqing, Tian, ‘Sheng dangzuo renjie, si yi wei guixiong: ji getun kangrijun luzhang Tian Boqing de yisheng’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989)Google Scholar.

76 Li Zhenyi, Hunan de xibei jiao, pp. 18–19.

77 Yuanwen, Xiang, ‘“Getun kangrijun” jie biji’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989): 26–29Google Scholar.

78 Datuo, Long, ‘Cong yake dao yingzhang—ji Shi Baqi getun shi’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989): 87–89Google Scholar.

79 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 14.

80 Bangben, Shi, p. 92; ‘Getun wuzhuang zhuyao chengyuan jianjie’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 147Google Scholar; Peng and Tian, ‘Sheng dangzuo renjie’, p. 36.

81 Mingguang, Long, ‘Deng Shidi getun pianduan’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 39–40Google Scholar.

82 ‘Yongsuixian shiwu xiangzhenzhang gei Yu Fanchuan de dianwen’, Dagongbao, 16 March 1937, reprinted in Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 17.

83 Ling, Long, ‘Fengyun tubian: shengjun baoxing diandi’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 42–46Google Scholar; Liu Shanshu, ‘Liang Mingyuan’, p. 34.

84 He Jian, ‘Gaige Xiangxi tunwu jingguo’, Hunan sheng zhengfu gongbao, 738 (15 June 1937), reprinted in Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 158–159; He Jian, ‘Hunan sheng zhengfu bugao’, 1937, reprinted in Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989): 168.

85 MZ, p. 206.

86 Long and Peng, ‘Liubi bainian’, p. 22; ‘Getun dashiji’, pp. 139–140.

87 Xiangxi suijing zhoukan, 4 (25 August 1935), p. 3.

88 Li Zhenyi, Hunan de xibei jiao, p. 13.

89 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 6; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 185.

90 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 185; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 9.

91 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, pp. 185–186; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 8; Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, p. 72.

92 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, pp. 8–9, 13; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, pp. 185–186.

93 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, pp. 9–10, Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 186; Hanying, Long and Heng, Tian, ‘Gongzhan Qianzhou cheng’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 55–57Google Scholar.

94 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 186; Youwen, Wu, ‘Mayang qishi’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 73–75Google Scholar.

95 Datuo, Long, ‘Weigong Baojing cheng’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 76Google Scholar.

96 This name sought to recognize Wu's supporters drawn from Miao districts from neighbouring provinces. Zongyuan, Shi, ‘Wu Hengliang zai Douwangzhai’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 63–64Google Scholar. Wu later adopted an even more expansive title: the Sichuan-Guizhou-Hunan-Hubei Four Province Border Area Abolish-Military-Land Resist-Japan Army. ‘Getun dashiji’, p. 141.

97 Liu Shanshu, ‘Liang Mingyuan’, pp. 34–35.

98 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 187; Hengliang, Wu, ‘Qian-Xiang Miaomin getun kangrijun zongzhihui Wu Hengliang chengwen’, Dagongbao, 27 October 1937, reprinted in Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 67Google Scholar.

99 Shi Zongyuan, ‘Wu Hengliang’, p. 63.

100 Shi Zongyuan, ‘Wu Hengliang’, p. 63. Some accounts say Wu Hengliang also met with and received encouragement from CC clique leaders in Hankou. Liu Shanshu, ‘Wu Hengliang’, p. 151.

101 Wu Youwen, ‘Mayang qishi’, p. 73.

102 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 187.

103 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 188; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 11; Boorman, Biographical Dictionary, vol. 1, pp. 41–42.

104 Xiujing, Yang, ‘Yuanling tanpan’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 108–109Google Scholar. Wu Hengliang stressed the same points in a petition during earlier negotiations with He Jian. Wu Hengliang, ‘Qian-Xiang Miaomin’, p. 67.

105 Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 11; Chen Tongchu, ‘Yixianfu’, p. 69.

106 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, pp. 188–189.

107 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 189; Liu Hanyuan, Xiangxi tuntian, pp. 3b, 20a, 24b–25a, 28b–29a, 34a.

108 Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, p. 189; Liu Nanpeng, ‘Xiangxi Miaojiang’, p. 3.

109 Cheng Zhenming, ‘Chen Quzhen nianpu’, pp. 73–74; Wu Xinfu, ‘Minguo nianjian’, pp. 189–190; Sun Xihua, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 12.

110 Ling, Long, ‘Shoubian qianhou’, Xiangxi wenshi ziliao 8 (1987): 123–126Google Scholar; Changhai, Wu, ‘Wei jiao Shi Xingshun duoci huan xianzhang’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989): 137Google Scholar.

111 Liu Shanshu, ‘Wu Hengliang’, p. 153.

112 ‘Getun wuzhuang’, p. 150.

113 Wu Hengliang, ‘Miao zhou’, pp. 160, 162; MZ, p. 213.

114 Changdao, Shi and Yuanzai, Shi, ‘Hongxiangzhang canjia getun’, Baojing wenshi ziliao 3 (1989): 48–51Google Scholar.

115 Wu Hengliang, ‘Miao zhou’, pp. 160–162.

116 Xihua, Sun, ‘Tuntianzhi youlai’, p. 14; Hunan renmin gemingshi (Changsha: Hunan chubanshe, 1991), p. 508Google Scholar.

117 Kinkley, Odyssey, p. 237. Li Zhenyi, Hunan de xibei jiao, pp. 31–32, notes contemporary views that the uprising revealed the characteristic xenophobia (paiwaixing) of the West Hunan people.