No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beyond the Front Line: China's rivalry with Japan in the English-language press over the Jinan Incident, 1928*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2013
Abstract
This paper examines how China and Japan fought for supremacy in China's treaty-port English-language press during the Jinan Incident of 1928. It argues that China's defeat in this media battle was a result of the long-term, unsettled political conditions the country was experiencing. The constant changes of government thwarted China's official and non-official efforts to establish a national news network. The threat from the northern warlords and China's intricate relations with the imperialist powers deterred the Nanjing regime from formulating decisive foreign propaganda policies. In contrast, Japan, with a strong news network in China, quickly installed its version of the event in the media. Its response was fast, consistent, and intensive. Japan also took advantage of the Nanjing Incident to justify its actions in Jinan. Press opinion in the treaty ports towards the Jinan Incident was split, with the British press supporting the Japanese and American papers favouring China's case. However, Japanese accounts, with the endorsement of the British treaty-port papers, still dominated the reports in The Times of London and influenced the views of the Manchester Guardian and The New York Times.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
Footnotes
*
I would like to thank Brian Martin, Tomoko Akami, and Richard Rigby for their invaluable guidance for this research. I am also indebted to Nathan Woolley for his cogent comments. The two anonymous reviewers’ suggestions also helped shape the final version of this paper.
References
1 See the memoir by the wife of China's then foreign minister, Huang Fu: Yiyun, Shen (1968). Yiyun huiyi [Shen Yiyun's memoir], Zhuanji wenxue chubanshe, Taipei, volume 2, pp. 369, 371Google Scholar.
2 Iriye, A. (1965). After Imperialism: The Search for a New Order in the Far East, 1921–1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 193–205Google Scholar; Wilbur, C. M. (1983). ‘The Nationalist Revolution: From Canton to Nanking, 1923–28’ in Fairbank, J. (ed.) The Cambridge History of China, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, volume 12, pp. 703–705Google Scholar; Morton, W. F (1980). Tanaka Giichi and Japan's China Policy, Dawson, Folkestone, p. 118Google Scholar; Jordan, D. A. (1976). The Northern Expedition: China's National Revolution of 1926–1928, University Press of Hawai'i, Honolulu, pp. 158–161.Google Scholar
3 Iriye, After Imperialism, pp. 193–205.
4 Jordan, The Northern Expedition, pp. 158–161.
5 Goodman, B. (2004). ‘Semi-Colonialism, Transnational Networks and News Flows in Early Republican Shanghai’, The China Review 4:1, pp. 55–88Google Scholar; Wagner, R. G. (1995). ‘The Role of the Foreign Community in the Chinese Public Sphere’, The China Quarterly 142, pp. 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Bickers, R. (1999). Britain in China, Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar; O'Connor, P. (2010). The English-language Press Networks of East Asia, 1918–1945, Global Oriental, Folkestone.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan first founded the Toho news agency in Shanghai in 1914. See Akami, T. (2008). ‘The Emergence of International Public Opinion and the Origins of Public Diplomacy in Japan in the Inter-War Period’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 3, pp. 105–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 O'Connor, P. (2001). ‘Endgame: The English-language Press Networks of East Asia in the Run-up to War, 1936–41’, Japan Forum 13:1, p. 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Desmond, R. W (1982). Crisis and Conflict: World News Reporting between Two Wars, 1920–1940, University of Iowa Press, Iowa, p. 186.Google Scholar
9 The $ here refers to Mexican dollars. O'Connor, ‘Endgame’, p. 69.
10 Chao, T. (1931). The Foreign Press in China: Preliminary Paper Prepared for the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Institute of Pacific Relations to be Held in Hangchow, from October 21st to November 4th, 1931, China Institute of Pacific Relations, Shanghai, p. 28.Google Scholar
11 Yue, Feng (2010). ‘Jindai jingjin diqu yingwenbao de yulun yu waijiao pingxi’ [Review of the opinions and diplomatic functions of the English-language newspapers in Beijing and Tianjin in modern times], Beijing hangkong hangtian daxue xuebao 23:3, p. 93.Google Scholar
12 Chao, The Foreign Press in China, p. 78.
13 Rea, G. B. (1915). Japan's Place in the Sun, Gibson Bros, Washington DCGoogle Scholar.
14 Chao, The Foreign Press in China, p. 78; Pugach, N. H. (1979). Paul S. Reinsch, Open Door Diplomat in Action, KTO Press, Millwood, New York, p. 113Google Scholar.
15 See George Bronson Rea's pamphlets: Rea, G. B. (1920). Japan's Right to Exist, ShanghiaGoogle Scholar; (1924). The Greatest Civilizing Force in Eastern Asia, Shanghai.
16 Editorial notice by William Donald, Far Eastern Review (March 1920).
17 ‘George Bronson Rea’, MLMSS 7594/5, Winston George Lewis papers, State Library of New South Wales [hereafter SLNSW].
18 ‘George Bronson Rea’, MLMSS 7594/5, Winston George Lewis papers, SLNSW; ‘George Bronson Rea: Character of and Activities in Far Eastern Affairs’ (16 February 1920), MLMSS 7594/5, Winston George Lewis papers, SLNSW.
19 ‘John B. Powell to Military Attaché’ (June 1920), MLMSS 7594/5, Winston George Lewis papers, SLNSW.
20 ‘George Bronson Rea’, MLMSS 7594/5, Winston George Lewis papers, SLNSW.
21 O'Connor, ‘Endgame’, p. 68.
22 Compte-rendu de renseignements No. 104/2 (9 July 1932). U38–2-715 Concession Francaise de Shanghai, Services de Police, Shanghai Municipal Council Archives.
23 French, P. (2007). Carl Crow, a Tough Old China Hand, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, p. 28.Google Scholar
24 Powell, J. B. (1945). My Twenty-Five Years in China, Macmillan, New York, p. 359.Google Scholar
25 Chao, The Foreign Press in China, p. 48.
26 Xubai, Zeng (1966). Zhongguo xinwenshi [The history of journalism in China], Guoli zhengzhi daxue xinwen yanjiusuo, Taipei, p. 571Google Scholar.
27 Storey, G. (1951). Reuters’ Century, 1851–1951, Parrish, London, pp. 204–206.Google Scholar
28 Zeng Xubai, Zhongguo xinwenshi, p. 571.
29 Zeng Xubai, Zhongguo xinwenshi, p. 573.
30 Gongzhen, Ge (1964). Zhongguo baoxueshi [The history of China's newspapers], Taiping shuju, Hong Kong, p. 255Google Scholar.
31 dianxunshe, Shen Shi (1934). Shi nian: Shen Shi dianxunshe chuangli shi zhounian jinian [The tenth anniversary of the Shen Shi news agency], Shenshi dianxunshe, Shanghai, p. 43Google Scholar.
32 Zhixiang, Feng (1975). Xiao Tongzi zhuan [A biography of Xiao Tongzi], Zhuanji wenxue chubanshe, Taipei, p. 3Google Scholar.
33 Chao, The Foreign Press in China, p. 6.
34 Diao later became director of the Intelligence and Publicity Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Nanjing.
35 Chao, The Foreign Press in China, p. 74.
36 Abend, H. (1943). My Life in China, 1926–1941, Harcourt, New York, p. 52.Google Scholar
37 Abend, My Life in China, pp. 51–52; Morrison, G. E. (1976). The Correspondence of G. E. Morrison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 10–11Google Scholar.
38 Morrison to Yen Ho-ling, 4 November 1913, in Morrison, The Correspondence of G. E. Morrison, pp. 238–239.
39 Morrison, The Correspondence of G.E. Morrison, p. 112.
40 Abend, My Life in China, pp. 15–19.
41 Bennett, M. and Grunfeld, A. T. (1993). On Her Own: Journalistic Adventures from San Francisco to the Chinese Revolution, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, p. 176Google Scholar.
42 Hahn, E. (1941). The Song Sisters, Doran and Company, New York, p. 115Google Scholar; Rand, P. (1955). China Hands: The Adventures and Ordeals of the American Journalists Who Joined Forces With the Great Chinese Revolution, Simon & Schuster, New York, p. 61Google Scholar.
43 See quotes of Reuters’ reports on the Jinan Incident, in ‘How the Japanese Reported the Tsinan Incident’, China Weekly Review (12 May 1928).
44 ‘How the Japanese Reported the Tsinan Incident’, China Weekly Review.
45 ‘Chinese Defy Tokyo, Cut Tsinan Railway’, The New York Times (1 May 1928); ‘Communications Cut’, China Press (1 May 1928).
46 Shen, Yiyun huiyi, p. 371.
47 ‘How the Japanese Reported the Tsinan Incident’, China Weekly Review.
48 ‘Japanese and Southerners Clash at Jinan’, North China Daily News (4 May 1928).
49 The North China Daily News was the most influential English-language paper in China. Operated by British interests, the paper was regarded as the official organ of the Shanghai Municipal Council.
50 ‘The Chinese Version’, North China Daily News (5 May 1928).
51 The China Press was owned and edited by Britons in the late 1920s.
52 ‘End Tsinan-fu Fight Both Sides Accused’, The New York Times (6 May 1928).
53 ‘Nationalist Statement’, The Times (5 May 1928).
54 Shi lue gao ben [Chiang Kai-shek's memoir] (17 May 1928), Academia Historica, Taipei, volume 3, p. 316.
55 Chiang Kai-shek's telegraph about the Jinan Incident (4 May 1928), in Zhonghua minguo zhongyao shiliao chubian: duiRi kangzhan shiqi: xubian [Collection of important historical materials: the anti-Japanese war: pre-1937], Zhongguo guomindang zhongyang weiyuanhui dangshi weiyuanhui, Taipei, p. 126.
56 Consul General at Shanghai (Cunningham) to the Secretary of the State, United States Department of State (1928). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, volume 2, pp. 137–138.
57 Gongbo, Chen (1928). ‘Women duiyu Tianzhong baoxing de zhuzhang’ [Our opinion on the outrages by the Tanaka government], Ge Ming Ping Lun, volume 3, p. 5Google Scholar.
58 ‘China to Ask League for Tsinan Inquiry’, The New York Times (8 May 1928).
59 ‘China Presents Her Case to the World’, China Weekly Review (19 May 1928).
60 Hanmin, Hu, ‘Shandong shijian tichu Guojilianmeng de jingguo’ [How the Jinan incident was presented to the League of Nations], in weiyuanhui, Guomindang dangshi ziliao bianzuan (1978). Ge Ming Wen Xian, volume 19–21, p. 1936Google Scholar.
61 Hu Hanmin's telegram to Huang Fu (12 May 1928), quoted in Shen, Yiyun huiyi, p. 383.
62 ‘China Asks Coolidge Our Stand on War by Japan in Jinan’, The New York Times (14 May 1928).
63 ‘Hu Hanmin, Sun Ke, Wu Chaoshu zi Bali zhi Tan Yankai zhuxi deng chenshu dui Jinan yijian dian’ [Telegraph about opinions on the Jinan Incident, sent by Hu Hanmin, Sun Ke, Wu Chaoshu from Paris to Tan Yankai] (12 May 1928), Zhonghua minguo zhongyao shiliao chubian: duiRi kangzhan shiqi: xubian I, p. 147; Shen, Yiyun huiyii, p. 382.
64 ‘Nanking Sends Wu Here on Shandong’, The New York Times (11 May 1928).
65 ‘The Secretary of State to the Minister in China (MacMurray)’ (4 April 1928), United States Department of State (1928). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, volume 2, p. 337.
66 ‘Mr. MacMurray's Brilliant Diplomatic Victory’, Far Eastern Review (April, 1928).
67 H. I. Timperley's eye-witness report on the Jinan Incident can be found in ‘Japanese Troops Isolated’, Manchester Guardian (5 May 1928).
68 Iriye, After Imperialism, pp. 199–200; Fairbank, The Cambridge History of China, pp. 703–705.
69 Elleman, B. A. (2009). Moscow and the Emergence of Communist Power in China, 1925–30: The Nanchang Uprising and the Birth of the Red Army, Routledge, New York, pp. 65–79.Google Scholar
70 Toho's reports on the Jinan Incident, quoted in ‘How the Japanese Reported the Tsinan Incident’, China Weekly Review.
71 MacMurry to the Secretary of the State (13 April 1928), United States Department of State (1928). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, volume 2, pp. 130–131. Zhonghua minguo shishi jiyao bianzuan weiyuanhui (1978). Zhonghua minguo shishi jiyao (Jan–Jun 1928) [The historical record of the Republican China], Zhongzheng shuju, Taipei, p. 503.
72 MacMurry to the Secretary of the State (29 February 1928), United States Department of State (1928). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, volume 2, pp. 323–324.
73 Iriya, After Imperialism, p. 196.
74 ‘Tokyo Papers Blame Cabinet’, The New York Times (6 May 1928); ‘Comment of Press’, China Press (6 May 1928).
75 ‘Correspondence’, China Press (17 May 1928).
76 ‘Press Criticism of Tanaka’, The New York Times (7 May 1928).
77 ‘Press Criticism of Tanaka’, The New York Times.
78 ‘Says Tokio Hide Casualties’, The New York Times (6 May 1928).
79 Qun, Zhang (1980). Wo yu Riben qishi nian [My seventy years with Japan], Zhong Ri guanxi yanjiu hui, Taipei, p. 36Google Scholar
80 Nish, I. (2002). Japanese Foreign Policy in the Interwar Period, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, p. 60Google Scholar; Morton, Tanaka Giichi and Japan's China Policy, p. 118.
81 ‘Chang Tso-Lin's Offer’, The Times (5 May 1928).
82 ‘Chang Protest to Japan’, The New York Times (6 May 1928).
83 ‘Chang Tso-lin Favours Truce between North and South before Tsinan’, North China Daily News (10 May 1928).
84 Sun, Yat-sen, (1928). San Min Zhu Yi [Three People's Principles], Commercial Press, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar.
85 Rigby, R. (1980). The May 30 Movement: Events and Themes, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 112–113Google Scholar.
86 Shi lue gao ben, p. 300.
87 Li Shizeng to Zhang Jingjiang and Huang Fu (13 May 1928), quoted in Shen, Yiyun huiyi, p. 384.
88 Cun, Xing (1928). ‘Jinan shijian zhi waibao yulun’ [Foreign newspapers’ opinions on the Jinan Incident], Ge Ming Ping Luni, volume 3, p. 53Google Scholar.
89 Bickers, Britain in China, pp. 22–66.
90 Chihiro, Hosoya (1982). ‘Britain and the United States in Japan's View of the International System, 1919–1937’, and Nish, I. ‘Japan in Britain's View of the International System, 1919–1937’, in Nish, I.Anglo-Japanese Alienation, 1919–1952, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–57Google Scholar; Nish, I. (1972). Alliance in Decline: a Study in Anglo-Japanese Relations, 1908–1923, Athlone Press, LondonGoogle Scholar.
91 Sokolsky, G. E. (1932). The Tinder Box of Asia, Doubleday, Doran & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar; Crow, C. (1937). Four Hundred Million Customers, Harper Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
92 ‘British papers’ refer to papers owned and operated by British citizens who supported British interests in China. The most popular ones during the period under examination are the North China Daily News and the China Press.
93 China Press (4 May 1928).
94 North China Daily News (5 May 1928).
95 North China Daily News (15 May 1928).
96 ‘The Chinese View of Tsinan’, North China Daily News (10 May 1928).
97 ‘From Rodney Gilbert’, North China Daily News (5 May 1928).
98 ‘Notes and Comments: The Responsibility at Tsinan’, North China Daily News (9 May 1928).
99 ‘A Repetition of Nanking?’, China Press (May 5, 1928).
100 ‘North and South May Sink Differences and Unite in Present Situation’, China Press (8 May 1928).
101 ‘The Chinese View of Tsinan’, North China Daily News (10 May 1928).
102 ‘The Judgement on Tsinan’, North China Herald (16 May 1928).
103 ‘A Repetition of Nanking?’, China Press (5 May 1928).
104 ‘The Tsinanfu Explosion’, North China Daily News (7 May 1928).
105 ‘An Atmosphere of Reasonableness’, North China Daily News (11 May 1928).
106 See editors’ explanations for their rejection of Chinese sources in ‘The Chinese View of Jinan’, North China Daily News (10 May 1928).
107 ‘Correspondence: A Chinese Voice’, China Press (12 May 1928).
108 ‘Japanese Press for Early Withdrawal’, North China Daily News (13 May 1928).
109 ‘The Chinese War: Japanese Hint to Chang’, The Times (21 May 1928); ‘The Situation in North China’, North China Daily News (23 May 1928).
110 ‘The Clash between the Nationalist and the Japanese in Tsinan’, China Weekly Review (12 May 1928).
111 ‘The Clash between the Nationalist and the Japanese in Tsinan’, China Weekly Review.
112 ‘The Clash between the Nationalist and the Japanese in Tsinan’, China Weekly Review.
113 ‘Foreign Die-hard Press Blames Chinese’, China Weekly Review (12 May 1928).
114 ‘Foreign Die-hard Press Blames Chinese’, China Weekly Review.
115 ‘Correspondence’, China Weekly Review (19 May 1928).
116 Comments from the Peking Leader quoted in the China Weekly Review (19 May 1928), p. 364.
117 ‘Presence of Japanese Troops Made Tsinan Clash Inevitable’, China Weekly Review (19 May 1928).
118 Quotes of Abend's comments from the Leader (May 1928), ‘In the Orient View: A Survey of the Periodical Press of China and Japan’, Pacific Affairs 1:1, pp. 22–23.
119 Leader, ‘In the Orient View’.
120 ‘Tanaka's Shandung Adventure a Failure from Every Possible Point of View!’, China Weekly Review (26 May 1928).
121 ‘Tanaka's Shandung Adventure a Failure from Every Possible Point of View!’, China Weekly Review.
122 ‘Reason for Japan's intervention’, China Weekly Review (19 May 1928).
123 ‘Reason for Japan's intervention’, China Weekly Review; ‘The Japanese Version’, China Weekly Review (12 May 1928).
124 Chao, The Foreign Press in China, p. 53.
125 Chao, The Foreign Press in China, p. 76.
126 ‘Fighting in Shandong’, The Times (4 May 1928); ‘Looting at Tsinan’, The Times (4 May 1928); ‘The Tsinanfu Outrage’, The Times (7 May 1928).
127 ‘The Chinese Puzzle,’ The Times (5 May 1928).
128 ‘The Chinese Puzzle,’ The Times.
129 ‘The Tsinanfu Outrage’, The Times.
130 ‘Japan and China: Severe Fighting in Shandong’, The Times (9 May 1928).
131 ‘China and Japan,’ Manchester Guardian (7 May 1928).
132 ‘Chang Tso-Lin's Peace Move’, Manchester Guardian (13 May 1928).
133 ‘From Bad to Worse’, Manchester Guardian (9 May 1928).
134 ‘China and the Powers’, Manchester Guardian (15 May 1928).
135 ‘Japanese Troops Isolated’, Manchester Guardian (5 May 1928); ‘The Clash in Shantung’, Manchester Guardian (6 May 1928); ‘Japanese Action in Shantung’, Manchester Guardian (7 May 1928).
136 ‘What Happened at Tsinanfu’, Manchester Guardian (11 May 1928).
137 ‘Japanese Action in Shantung’, Manchester Guardian (7 May 1928).
138 ‘From Bad to Worse’, Manchester Guardian (9 May 1928).
139 ‘Japanese Troops Isolated’, Manchester Guardian (5 May 1928).
140 ‘China and Japan’, Manchester Guardian (7 May 1928).
141 ‘From Bad to Worse’, Manchester Guardian (9 May 1928).
142 ‘Many Japanese Killed’, The New York Times (4 May 1928); ‘Japanese Charge Atrocities’, The New York Times (6 May 1928); ‘Tokyo Plans to Send New Force to China’, The New York Times (7 May 1928).
143 ‘Many Japanese Killed’, The New York Times.
144 ‘Reported Burned to Death’, The New York Times (7 May 1928).
145 ‘Japanese Charge Atrocities’, The New York Times.
146 ‘British Warships on Way to China’, The New York Times (10 May 1928).
147 ‘New Chinese Troubles’, The New York Times (12 May 1928).
148 Cai Yuanpei and Tan Yankai's proposal on foreign diplomacy (21 August 1928), the fifth meeting of the second conference of the Central Executive Committee, political files, 6.31.2, the Research Committee of the History of the Guomindang, Taipei.
149 Proposals for improving foreign propaganda (20 March 1929), conference files, 3.1/3.12; 3.1/14.17, the Research Committee of the History of the Guomindang, Taipei.
150 ‘Foreword’, The China Critic (31 May 1928).
151 Shi, Hu (2004). Hu Shi riji quanji, 1928–1930 [Collection of Hu Shi's diary] Lian jing chuban gongsi, Taipei, volume 5, p. 417Google Scholar.