No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Adivasi images, Adivasi voices. The resonance of the Eickstedt collection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2022
Abstract
This article analyses how past and contemporary Adivasi voices are expressed in colonial photographs, and how they have—and continue to—both enable and restrict speaking through visual representation. It examines the collection of the German anthropologist Egon von Eickstedt, who in the 1920s took about 12,000 photographic images and 2,000 objects from Adivasi communities in India, Ceylon, and Burma. As a racial anthropologist he defined and framed the photos and created the collection according to his own preconceptions. The photographs, embedded in a colonial context and an increasingly racial/racist German anthropology, reveal very asymmetric power relations. Yet, the voice of the Adivasi is not completely suppressed, as the photographed people are not mere objects, but find various ways of expressing sentiments in the photographs. Ninety years on, the images and objects have lost none of their ambiguity. They continue to resonate when newly arranged and criticized in the permanent exhibition of a German museum, as well as when curated at the Museum of Voice of the Adivasi Academy in Gujarat.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Modern Asian Studies , Volume 56 , Special Issue 5: Multiple Worlds of the Adivasi , September 2022 , pp. 1416 - 1437
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
AG gegen Rassenkunde (1998): Deine Knochen, deine Wirklichkeit. Texte gegen rassistische und sexistische Kontinuität in der Humanbiologie. Hamburg: Unrast.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland (1982): Camera Lucida. Reflections on photography. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bauer, Paul (1930): The German attack on Kangchenjunga 1929. The Himalayan Journal 2, retrieved from https://www.himalayanclub.org/hj/2/2/the-german-attack-on-kangchenjunga-1929/, [last accessed 16 June 2022].Google Scholar
Bechtold, Fritz (1935): The German Himalayan expedition to Nanga Parbat 1934. The Himalayan Journal 7, retrieved from https://www.himalayanclub.org/hj/7/2/the-german-himalayan-expedition-to-nanga-parbat-1934/, [last accessed 15 June 2022].Google Scholar
Bell, Joshua A. (2003): Looking to see. Reflections on visual repatriation in the Purari Delta, Gulf Province, Papua New Guinea. In: Peers, Laura L. and Brown, Alison K. (eds): Museums and Source Communities. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 111–122.Google Scholar
Blaney, Aileen; Shah, Chinar (eds) (2018): Photography in India. From archives to contemporary practice. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Boast, Robin (2011): Neocolonial collaboration. Museum as contact zone revisited. Museum Anthropology 34 (1), pp. 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, Zahid (2012): Afterimage of Empire: Photography in nineteenth century India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James; Marcus, George E. (eds) (2010): Writing Culture. The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. (1996): Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge. The British in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, John; Collier, Malcolm (1967): Visual Anthropology. Photography as a research method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques; Prenowitz, Eric (1995): Archive fever. A Freudian impression. Diacritics 25 (2), pp. 9–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. (2001): Castes of Mind. Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ebeling, Markus Knut; Günzel, Stephan (eds) (2009): Archivologie. Theorien des Archivs in Wissenschaft, Medien und Künsten. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.Google Scholar
Edwards, Elizabeth (2001): Raw Histories. Photographs, anthropology and museums. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Edwards, Elizabeth (2011): Tracing photography. In: Banks, Marcus and Ruby, Jay (eds): Made to be Seen. Perspectives on the history of visual anthropology. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 159–189.Google Scholar
Eickstedt, Egon von (1928): Zweiter Ethnographischer Bericht. Die Sora. Ethnologischer Anzeiger 1 (5), pp. 184–190.Google Scholar
Falconer, John (1995): A Shifting Focus: Photography in India 1850–1900. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sophie (2004): Uncovering India: Studies of nineteenth-century Indian photography. History of Photography 28 (2), pp. 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart (2006): Encoding/decoding. In: Durham, Meenakshi Gigi and Kellner, Douglas M. (eds): Media and Cultural Studies Key Works. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 163–173.Google Scholar
International Council of Museums (2009): Development of the Museum Definition according to ICOM Statutes. Available at http://archives.icom.museum/hist_def_eng.html, [last accessed 5 April 2018].Google Scholar
Karlekar, Malavika (2005): Re-visioning the Past: Early photography in Bengal 1875–1915. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kazeem, Belinda; Martinz-Turek, Charlotte; Sternfeld, Nora (eds) (2009): Das Unbehagen im Museum. In: Postkoloniale Museologien. Wien: Turia und Kant.Google Scholar
Kravagna, Christian (2009): Konserven des Kolonialismus. Die Welt im Museum. In: Kazeem, Belinda, Martinz-Turek, Charlotte, Sternfeld, Nora (eds): Das Unbehagen im Museum. Postkoloniale Museologien. Wien: Turia and Kant, pp. 131–142.Google Scholar
Lüddecke, Andreas (2000): Rassen, Schädel und Gelehrte. Zur politischen Funktionalität der anthropologischen Forschung und Lehre in der Tradition Egon von Eickstedts. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Sharon (ed.) (1998): The Politics of Display. Museums, science, culture. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manjapra, Kris (2014): Age of Entanglement. German and Indian intellectuals across empire. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne (2009): German Orientalism in the Age of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1996): What do pictures really want? October 77, pp. 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Katja (2015): Die Eickstedt-Sammlung aus Südindien. Differenzierte Wahrnehmungen kolonialer Fotografien und Objekte. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Katja (2017a): Picturing Culture. The photography of Muttappan teyyam between 1920 and today. Visual Anthropology 30 (2), pp. 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Katja (2017b): Reframing the Aura. Digital photography in ancestral worship. Museum Anthropology 40 (1), pp. 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Katja (2018): The Eickstedt Archive. German anthropology in colonial India. I ndian Historical Review 45 (2), pp. 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Katja (2021): Digital Archives. Creating online access to cultural heritage. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Katja; Wille, Boris (2019): Materiality and mobility: Comparative notes on heritagisation in the Indian Ocean World. In: Schnepen, Burkhard and Sen, Tansen (eds): Travelling Pasts: The politics of cultural heritage in the Indian Ocean world. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Noack, Karoline; Kraus, Michael (eds) (2015): Quo vadis, Völkerkundemuseum? Aktuelle Debatten zu ethnologischen Sammlungen in Museen und Universitäten. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Oesterheld, Joachim (1996): Zum Spektrum der indischen Präsenz in Deutschland von Beginn bis Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts. In: Höpp, Gerhard (ed.): Fremde Erfahrungen: Asiaten und Afrikaner in Deutschland, Österreich und in der Schweiz bis 1945. Berlin: Verlag das Arabische Buch/ZMO.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen (2015): Underdogs in dialogue. History and Theory 54 (1), pp. 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, H. Glenn (2002): Objects of Culture. Ethnology and ethnographic museums in imperial Germany. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pinney, Christopher (1997): Camera Indica. The social life of Indian photographs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pohlmann, Ulrich; Siegert, Dietmar; Ruelfs, Esther (eds) (2001): Sieben Jahre Indien. Photographien und Reiseberichte 1863–1870. München: Schirmer/Mosel.Google Scholar
Preuß, Dirk (2009): ‘Anthropologe und Forschungsreisender’. Biographie und Anthropologie Egon Freiherr von Eickstedts (1892–1965). München: Utz.Google Scholar
Rycroft, Daniel; Müller, Katja (2013): The future of anthropology's archival knowledge: an international reassessment (FAAKIR). In: Blesse, Giselher (ed.): Jahrbuch der Staatlichen Ethnographischen Sammlungen. Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, pp. 215–227.Google Scholar
Skelton, Robert (1979): Obituary: William George Archer. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2, pp. 186–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura (2009): Along the Archival Grain. Epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Theye, Thomas (ed.) (1989): Der geraubte Schatten. Die Photographie als ethnographisches Dokument. München: Bucher.Google Scholar
Tilche, Alice (2015): Pithora in the time of kings, elephants and art dealers: Art and social change in Western India. Visual Anthropology 28 (1), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Brescius, Moritz (2019): German Science in the Age of Empire: Enterprise, opportunity and the Schlagintweit brothers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendl, Tobias (1996): Warum sie nicht sehen, was sie sehen könnten. Zur Perzeption von Fotografien im Kulturvergleich. Anthropos 91, pp. 169–181.Google Scholar
Wiener, Michael (1990): Ikonographie des Wilden. Menschen-Bilder in Ethnographie und Photographie zwischen 1850 und 1918. München: Trickster.Google Scholar