Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:13:29.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topotactic replacement of augite by omphacite in a blueschist rock from north-west Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. A. Carpenter  and
A. Okay
M. A. Carpenter
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Downing Street, Cambridge
A. Okay
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Downing Street, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Partial replacement of original igneous augite crystals by omphacite during blueschist metamorphism of a dolerite from the Mihalliççik area of north-west Turkey has been studied by transmission electron microscopy. The replacement occurred topotactically, apparently by ion exchange with a fluid phase, which left the basic pyroxene structure unchanged. Cation ordering in the omphacite caused a symmetry change from C-face centred to primitive with the formation of fine-scale antiphase domains. Selected-area diffraction provides evidence for P2 and P2/c space groups for the ordered omphacite though the best ordered areas show a tendency towards P2/n (reflections violating the n-glide are very weak) and also contain fine, wavy, disordered precipitates approximately parallel to (too).

It is suggested that the replacement temperature was below the cation-ordering temperature and that the omphacite grew in a metastable, disordered state. Subsequent ordering occurred under irreversible conditions via a series of intermediate structures. The ordering sequence may illustrate the relationship between different ordering schemes in other blueschist pyroxenes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 42 , Issue 324 , December 1978 , pp. 435 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, (P. M.), 1974. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 45, 281-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, (W. L.), 1972. Bull. Soc. fr. Minéral. Cristallogr. 95, 574-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champness, (P. E.), 1973. Am. Mineral. 58, 540–2.Google Scholar
Clark, (J. R.) and Papike, (J. J.), 1968. Ibid. 53, 840-68.Google Scholar
Clark, (J. R.), Appleman, (D. E.), and Papike, (J. J.), 1969. Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 2, 31–50.Google Scholar
Cogulu, (E.), 1967. Étude pérographique de la région de Mihalliççik (Turquie). D.Sc. Thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Curtis, (L.), Gittins, (J.), Kocman, (V.), Rucklidge, (J. C.), Hawthorne, (F. C.), and Ferguson, (R. B.), 1975. Can. Mineral. 13, 62-7.Google Scholar
Eitel, (W.), 1954. The physical chemistry of the silicates. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Essene, (E. J.) and Fyfe, (W. S.), 1967. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 15, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, (T.), Tokonami, (M.), and Morimoto, (N.), 1975. Am. Mineral. 60, 634-41.Google Scholar
McConnell, (J. D. C.), 1975. Ann. Rev. Earth Planetary Sciences, 3, 129-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsch, (K.-H.), 1972. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 34, 116-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phakey, (P. P.) and Ghose, (S.), 1973. Ibid. 39, 239-45.Google Scholar
Statham, (P. J.), 1976. X-ray Spectrom. 5, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweatman, (T. R.) and Long, (J. V. P.), 1969. J. Petrol. 10, 332-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar