Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:41:16.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silver mineralization at Sark's Hope mine, Sark, Channel Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. A. Ixer
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Aston in Birmingham, Gosta Green, Birmingham B4 7ET
C. J. Stanley
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Aston in Birmingham, Gosta Green, Birmingham B4 7ET

Abstract

Sark's Hope silver-lead lode, which was mined during the 1830s and 1840s cuts a Late Precambrian granite at the southernmost point of the island of Sark. The primary ore assemblage is pyrite, galena, chalcopyrite, tennantite, tetrahedrite, sphalerite, marcasite, arsenopyrite, pyrrhotine, bravoite, enargite, and the silver minerals pyrargyrite, pearceite, polybasite, and acanthite. Gangue minerals are hematitic quartz, calcite, and illite. Alteration products include chalcosine, covelline, blaubleibender covelline, limonite, malachite, azurite, cerussite, and anglesite. The generalized paragenesis is of early Fe, Co, Ni, As, and S species and later minerals of Pb, Cu, Ag, Zn, Fe, As, Sb, and S. The earliest alteration products are copper sulphides; these are followed by lead and copper carbonates and sulphates, and hydrated iron and manganese oxides. Growth zoning is a common feature of many of the ore minerals, and electron microprobe analysis shows that this is sometimes related to compositional differences. Tetrahedrite and tennantite, particularly, exhibit a wide range of compositions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. J. D. (1976) J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 132, 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. C. Criddle, A. J., and Clark, A. M. (1977) Mineral. Mag. 41, 5963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldyreva, M. M., and Borodayev, Yu. S. (1973) Dokl. Acad. Sci. USSR, Earth Sci. Sect. 212, 180–1.Google Scholar
Chauris, L. (1977) C.R. somm. Soc. Geol. Fr. 2, 85–8.Google Scholar
Chauris, L. (1979) Bull. Soc. Geol. Normandie et Amis Museum, 66, 1143.Google Scholar
Henwood, W. J. (1871a) Trans. R. geol. Soc. Cornwall, 8, 530–9.Google Scholar
Henwood, W. J. (1871b) Ibid. 734–6.Google Scholar
Ixer, R. A., and Stanley, C. J. (1980) Mineral. Mag. 43, 1025–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourant, A. E., and Warren, J. P. (1934) Rep. Trans. Soc. Guernesiaise, 12, 7388.Google Scholar
Pattrick, R. A. D. (1978) Mineral. Mag. 42, 286–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, J. (1846) Trans. R. geol. Soc. Cornwall 6, 101–3.Google Scholar
Riley, J. F. (1974) Mineral. Deposita, 9, 117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, C. J., and Ixer, R. A. (1982) Mineral. Mag. 46, 134–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J., and Watson, J. (1957) Proc. Geol. Assoc. 68, 179202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasil'yev, V. I., and Lavrent'yev, Yu. G. (1974) Dokl. Acad. Sci. USSR, Earth Sci. Sect. 218, 111–13.Google Scholar
Yushkin, N. P. (1978) Ibid. 242, 149–52.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article: