Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T07:01:36.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representation of estuarine, coastal and marine biosphere systems within post-closure performance assessments supporting geological disposal of higher activity radioactive wastes in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

R. C. Walke ,
M. C. Thorne ,
J. T. Smith  and
R. Kowe
R. C. Walke*
Affiliation:
Quintessa Limited, The Hub, 14 Station Road, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire RG9 1AY, UK
M. C. Thorne
Affiliation:
Mike Thorne and Associates Limited, Quarry Cottage, Hamsterley, County Durham DL13 3NJ, UK
J. T. Smith
Affiliation:
School of Earth&Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, UK
R. Kowe
Affiliation:
Radioactive Waste Management Limited, Building 587, Curie Avenue, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RH, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radioactive Waste Management Limited (RWM) is tasked with implementing geological disposal of the United Kingdom's (UK) higher activity radioactive wastes. This paper describes how RWM's biosphere modelling capability has been extended from a solely terrestrial model to allow potential contaminant releases to estuarine, coastal and marine systems around the UK to be represented. The new models aim to strike a balance between being as simple as can be justified, erring on the side of conservative estimates of potential doses, while also representing the features and processes required to reflect and distinguish UK coastal systems. Sediment dynamics (including meandering of estuaries and sediment accumulation) are explicitly represented in a simplified form that captures the accumulation and remobilization of radionuclides. Long-term transitions between biosphere systems (such as from a salt marsh to a terrestrial system) are outside the scope of the study. The models and supporting data draw on information about the UK that is representative of present-day conditions and represent potential exposures arising from both occupational and recreational habits.?

Generic calculations demonstrate that potential doses to humans arising from releases to estuarine, coastal and marine systems are typically more than two orders of magnitude lower than those for equivalent releases to terrestrial systems via well water and groundwater discharge to soil. The extended capability (i) ensures that RWM is able to undertake assessments for potential coastal site contexts, if and when required, and (ii) provides RWM with quantitative evidence to support the principal focus on terrestrial releases ( particularly for more generic assessments).

Keywords

radioactive wastebiosphereestuarycoastalmarinedose assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 79 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 1467 - 1474
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2015. This is an open access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2015

References

Dewar, A., Jenkinson, S. and Smedley, C. (2011) Parameter Values used in Coastal Dispersion Modelling for Radiological Assessments. Environment Agency report SC060080/R3, February 2011.Google Scholar
EA, FSA, NIEA and SEPA (2013) Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2012. Report compiled by the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) on behalf of the Environment Agency, Food Standards Agency, Northern Ireland Environment Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, RIFE 18, October 2013.Google Scholar
GoldSim (2014) Monte Carlo Simulation Software. http://www.goldsim.com/ Google Scholar
ICRP (2013) Radiological Protection in Geological Disposal of Long-lived Solid Radioactive Waste. Annals of the ICRP, 42(3).Google Scholar
Limer, L.M.C. and Thorne, M.C. (2011) NDA RWMD Biosphere Assessment Studies FY2010-2011: Radiological Screening. Quintessa Limited report to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Radioactive Waste Management Directorate QRS-1378ZM-2, Version 1.0, February 2011.Google Scholar
NDA (2010) Geological Disposal: Biosphere Status Report. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority report NDA/RWMD/036, December 2010.Google Scholar
Smith, J.G. and Simmonds, J.R. (Editors) (2009) The Methodology for Assessing the Radiological Consequences of Routine Releases of Radionuclides to the Environment used in PC CREAM 08. Report of the Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency, HPA-RPD-058, October 2009.Google Scholar
Walke, R.C., Thorne, M.C. and Smith, J.T. (2013a) RWMD Biosphere Assessment Model: Marine Component. AMEC report to NDA RWMD 18025/ TR/001, Issue 2.0.Google Scholar
Walke, R.C., Thorne, M.C. and Limer, L.M.C. (2013b) RWMD Biosphere Assessment Model: Terrestrial Component. AMEC report to NDA RWMD 18025/ TR/002, Issue 2.0.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, C.D. (2003) Coasts: Form, Process and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar