Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:26:20.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planning to 'remember to forget'?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

S. Mobbs
S. Mobbs*
Affiliation:
Eden Nuclear and Environment, Eden Conference Barn, Low Moor, Penrith, Cumbria CA10 1XQ, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Disposal in deep geological formations aims to provide isolation of long-lived radioactive waste for hundreds of thousands of years. This raises the question of the long-term governance of the repository throughout its lifetime. In the operational phase the repository is under active regulatory control. Once closed, there will be a phase of passive management control or indirect oversight. This will be followed, at some time in the future, by a period in which there is no oversight. This may be a result of a decision to cease management control or it may occur through loss of records or a change in priorities. The importance of the main exposure scenarios (exposure as a result of the gradual transport of radionuclides in groundwater, transport of radionuclides in gas, and exposure arising from inadvertent intrusion into the repository) are discussed with reference to these different phases. An interesting question is 'How do we minimize the risk of inadvertent intrusion in the far future?' Perhaps it is better to ensure that the repository is forgotten and should we try to plan for this? The different approaches are discussed and the importance of deciding on a strategy at an early stage is emphasized.

Keywords

geological disposallong-term safetyradioactive waste
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 8 , December 2012 , pp. 3491 - 3496
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
© [2012] The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2012

References

Commission of the European Communities (1988) Performance Assessment of the Geological Isolation System for Radioactive Wastes. CEC Report EUR-11775. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
John Hart and Associates (2004) Permanent Markers Implementation Plan: Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico. Report No. DOE/WIPP 04- 3302, [http://www.wipp.energy.gov/library/PermanentMarkersImplementationPlan.pdf].Google Scholar
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2011) Radiological Protection in Geological Disposal of Long-lived Solid Radioactive Waste. ICRP reference 4838–8963.9177, [http://www.icrp.org/docs/Radiological-protection-in-geological-disposal.pdf].Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - Nuclear Energy Agency (2008) Moving Forward with Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: A Collective Statement by the NEA Radioactive Waste Management Committee. NEA Report 6433. OECD Publications, Paris.Google Scholar
Sandia (1992) Expert Judgement on Markers to Deter Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND92–1382.UC-721, p.F-49, [http:// downlode.org/Etext/WIPP/].Google Scholar
SKB (1983) Final Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel - KBS-3, volumes I-IV. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB), Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
UK Government and the devolved administrations (2006) Response to the Report and Recommendations from the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM). Product code PB 12303. Department for Environment Fisheries and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), London.Google Scholar