Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:55:18.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new procedure for relocating mineral grains for microprobe analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

P. J. Potts ,
A. G. Tindle  and
D. Stanford
P. J. Potts
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK
A. G. Tindle
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK
D. Stanford
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new procedure is described for locating mineral grains in geological samples prepared for microprobe analysis. This procedure uses a digital image of the entire sample surface to select points of interest. These features of interest must be visible in this external image. Once the sample is mounted on the specimen stage of the microprobe, the digital image is used as a ‘map’ to relocate minerals for analysis. The image can be recorded using either a video camera, fitted with a macro zoom lens, or a flat-bed scanner. A calibration procedure has been developed in which two indexing points are used to calculate the instrument stage coordinates from the pixel coordinates of the digital image. Following this calibration, the stage coordinates of any feature visible in the digital image can be displayed to facilitate rapid relocation. The procedure was evaluated by relocating magnetite grains visible in an optical image of a geological thin section. The repositioning accuracy in relocating 28 magnetite grains distributed over an area of about 20 × 30 mm was found to be 157 ± 102 µm (one standard deviation) from the video camera image and 48 ± 28 µm from a flat bed scanner image. The former image was thought to suffer from some optical distortion. The procedure may be applied to any microprobe instrument fitted with a digital x-y specimen stage. Future applications in relocating features visible in autoradiographs are currently being evaluated.

Keywords

microprobe analysismineral grainsgrain location
Type
Image analysis
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 59 , Issue 395 , June 1995 , pp. 221 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basham, I. R. and Easterbrook, G. D. (1977) Alpha particle autoradiography of geological specimens by use of cellulose nitrate detectors. Inst. Mining and Metall. Bull, 86, B96-8.Google Scholar
Harrowfield, I. R., McRae, C. M. and Simmonds, P. F. (1988) The automated scanning electron microscope as a tool for gold microprospecting. Microbeam Anal, 481-2.Google Scholar
Jambor, J. L. and Vaughan D. J. (1990) Advanced microscopic studies of ore minerals. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Handbook, 17, 426 pp.Google Scholar
Jones, M. P. and Gavrilovic, J. (1968) Automated searching unit for the quantitative location of rare phases by electron-probe X-ray microanalysis. Trans. Inst. Mining and Metall., 77, B137-43.Google Scholar
Kerr, P. F. (1959) Optical Mineralogy, McGraw-Hill (New York), 422 pp.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, P. R. and Petruk, W. (1989) Automated location of minerals of low abundance using an image analyser. In Short course on image analysis applied to mineral and Earth Sciences (Petruk, W., ed.). Mineralogical Association of Canada, Short Course Handbook, Volume 16, 90-3Google Scholar
Petruk, W. (1989) (Ed.) Short course on image analysis applied to mineral and Earth Sciences. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Short Course Handbook, Volume 16, 156 pp.Google Scholar
Potts, P. J. (1984) Neutron activation induced beta autoradiography as a technique for locating minor phases in thin section: application to rare earth element and platinum-group element mineral analysis. Econ. Geol., 79, 738–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, P. J. and Tindle, A. G. (1990) Autoradiography by X-ray-excited optical luminescence (XEOL): Application to scheelite and fluorite mineralisation. Chem. Geol., 83, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. A. and LeCheminant, G. M. (1989) An integrated image and X-ray analysis system: Description and techniques in a multiple use laboratory. In Short course on image analysis applied to mineral and Earth Sciences (Petruk, W., ed.). Mineralogical Association of Canada, Short Course Handbook, Volume 16, 43–55.Google Scholar
Walker, D. A., Paktunc, A. D. and Villineuve, M. E. (1989) Automated image analysis applications: Characterisation of (1) platinum-group element and (2) heavy mineral separates. In Short course on image analysis applied to mineral and Earth Sciences (Petruk, W., ed.). Mineralogical Association of Canada, Short Course Handbook, Volume 16, 94–105.Google Scholar
Walker, R. K. and Jones, M. P. (1990) Turboscan — the rare phase locating system. Department of Mineral Resources Engineering, Imperial College (London), 64 pp.Google Scholar
Wollenberg, H. A. (1973) Fission-track radiography of uranium and thorium in radioactive minerals. In Geochemical exploration 1972 (Jones, M.P., ed.). Institution of Mining and Metallurgy (London), 347-58.Google Scholar