Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:34:40.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The mineralogical system: Can global plots teach us something new?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Milan Rieder*
Affiliation:
Nanotechnology Centre VŠB-TUO, Ostrava, Czech Republic

Abstract

Data based on end-member formulae of 4872 minerals (4975 entries) were subjected to numerical treatment and plotting. Most conspicuous among the findings is the hydration trend that spans the whole mineralogical system– something that may be related to the geological history of mineral formation on Earth. Interesting negative relationships were confirmed for pairs O and F, O and Cl, and Al and Si, while the O vs. S graph documents the dual nature of the behaviour of sulfur. Determinations of Al and Si have the potential of alarming the analyst that his phase might contain hydrogen. The dataset available also permitted the plotting of histograms that illustrate the preferred concentration distribution of individual elements throughout the mineral kingdom.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ciriotti, M.E. (2012) MinData Base (CLASS & SEARCH), List of all valid mineral species as recognized by IMA CNMNC, version 31.01.2012. [Most recent version available at http://cloud.amimin-erals.it/index.php/s/c59e63ff95f9a6086d-fe5443db11b56e?path=%2FClassificazione].Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M. and Ferry, J.M. (2010) Mineral evolution: Mineralogy in the fourth dimension. Elements, 6, 912. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, R.M., Papineau, D., Bleeker, W., Downs, R.T., Ferry, J.M., McCoy, T.J., Sverjensky, D.A. and Yang, H. (2008) Mineral evolution. American Mineralogist, 93, 16931720. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivovichev, V.G. and Charykova, M.V. (2013a) Chislo mineralov razlichnykh khimicheskikh elementov: statistika 2012 goda (novyi podkhod k staroi pro-bleme) [Numbers of minerals containing different chemical elements: Statistics of 2012 (a new approach to an old problem)]. Zapiski Rossiiskogo mineralo-gicheskogo obshchestva, 142,4767 Google Scholar
Krivovichev, V.G. and Charykova, M.V. (2013b) Klassifikatsiya mineral ‘nykh sistem [Classification of mineral systems]. Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosu-darstvennogo universiteta, Russia, 196 pp.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, W. (1954) The distribution of aluminum in the tetrahedra of silicates and aluminates. American Mineralogist, 39, 9296. Google Scholar
Pasero, M. (2012) The New IMA list of minerals -A work in progress - Update: September 2012. Available from http://nrmima.nrm.se/IMA_Master_List_%282012-09%29.pdf Google Scholar
Rieder, M. (2014) The mineralogical system. 2D projec¬tions and their potential in mineral identification. European Journal of Mineralogy, 26,703710 Google Scholar
Shannon, C.E. (1948) A mathematical theory of commu¬nication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379423.and 623-656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, C.J. (2013) COM Wavelength Database. Natural History Museum, London.Google Scholar
Williams, P.A., Hatert, F., Pasero, M. and Mills, S.J. (2014) IMA Commission of New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) Newsletter 19 (New minerals and nomenclature modifications approved in 2014). Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 165170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rieder supplementary material

Supplementary Table 2

Download Rieder supplementary material(File)
File 111.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Rieder supplementary material

Supplementary Table 3

Download Rieder supplementary material(File)
File 117.2 KB