Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:05:42.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metasomatism in the Wairere Serpentinite, King Country, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

T. M. Leach
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand
K. A. Rodgers
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand

Summary

Metasomatic zones formed at the borders of various mafic inclusions in the Wairere Serpentinite, central North Island, New Zealand, show eucritic and hornblende gabbros grading through distinct zones of altered gabbro (hydrogarnet-free) to coarse and finegrained rodingites (hydrogarnet-bearing). The hydrated, calcium-rich, aluminium-silicate mineral assemblages of each reaction zone change between the zones, with one mineral phase being altered to another at each replacement front. Initial alteration of the gabbros albitized, prehnitized, and epidotized plagioclase and chloritized hornblende and clinopyroxene. Continuing metasomatism garnetized prehnite and generated secondary amphibole and pyroxene while the original host harzburgite was highly serpentinized and, adjacent to the inclusions, the serpentinite was chloritized so as to form a further distinct zone between peridotite and gabbro. These mineral replacement reactions are reflected in the bulk chemistry of the reaction zones, which show that increasing alteration of the gabbro is accompanied by a marked increase in Ca and H2O, a possible small gain in Mg, and depletion in Si, Al, and alkalis. These trends are balanced in the host peridotite by Si enrichment and Ca loss upon serpentinization. Clinopyroxenes and hornblendes of the zones show an increase in Ca and Mg and a decrease in Si with increasing metasomatic alteration. Garnets also decrease in Si but chlorites show an increase in both Si and Mg. Additional minerals analysed from both primary and altered rocks include olivine, orthopyroxene, biotite, plagioclase, pectolite, rosenhahnite, sphene, and chrome spinel. The zones are regarded as the result of reaction between the inclusions and Ca- and Al-rich solutions derived, in turn, by action of alkaline, CO2-poor solutions, which percolated through fractures in the original host peridotite and, in the process of serpentinization, released Mg and enhanced Ca and Al levels. At the contact of the mafic inclusions, chemical gradients were generated down which various chemical species diffused to different levels forming the zonation. The reactions probably took place in the vicinity of 260 to 350 °C, 2 to 3 kb, and at constant volume. Cataclasis and brecciation of the outer zones indicate more than one metasomatic episode.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, (P. M.), Chenhall, (B. E.), Cremer, (P. L.), and Irving, (A. J.), 1971. J. Proc. R. Soc. N.S.W. 104, 11-29.Google Scholar
Baker, (G.), 1959. J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 6, 21-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, (I.), Lamarche, (V. C.), and Himmelberg, (G.), 1967. Science, 156, 830-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, (I.) and O'Neil, (J. R.), 1969. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 80, 1947-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, (I.) Rapp, (J.), O'Neil, (J. R.), Sheppard, (R. A.), and Gude, (A. I.), 1972. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 35, 263-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassaget, (J. P.), Michel, (R.), and Richard, (F.), 1967. Trans. Lab. Géol., Grenoble, 43, 126-52.Google Scholar
Bell, (J. M.), Clarke, (E. C.), and Marshall, (P.), 1911. N.Z. Geol. Surv. Bull. 12, 31-8.Google Scholar
Bevan, (J.) and Rodgers, (K. A.), 1977. Mineral. Mag. 41, 391-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, (S. A.) and Howie, (R. A.), 1960. Am. Mineral. 45, 791-80.Google Scholar
Bird, (J. M.) and Dewey, (J. F.), 1970. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 81, 1031-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, (J. M.) and Dewey, (J. F.), 1971. J, Geophys. Res. 76, 3179-206.Google Scholar
Bloxam, (T. W.), 1954. Mineral. Mag. 30, 525-8.Google Scholar
Bowen, (N. L.) and Tuttle, (O. F.), 1949. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 60, 439-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowin, (C.), 1966. Mere. Geol. Soc. Am. 98, 1184.Google Scholar
Buchner, (D. A.), Roy, (D. N.), and Roy, (R.), 1960. Am. J. Sci. 258, 132-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, (I. H.), 1975. Geol. Mag. 112, 77-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, (E. T.), 1956. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 56, 327-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carswell, (D. A.), Curtis, (C. D.), and Kanaris-Sotiriou, (R.), 1974. J. Petrol. 15, 383-402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Černy, (P.), 1968. Am. Mineral. 53, 1377-85.Google Scholar
Challis, (G. A.), 1965a. J. Petrol. 6, 322-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challis, (G. A.), 1965b. Ibid. 395-419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chidester, (A. H.), 1962. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 345.Google Scholar
Coleman, (R. G.), 1961. J. Petrol. 2, 209-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, (R. G.), 1962. Geol. Soc. Am. Special Pap. 73, 130.Google Scholar
Coleman, (R. G.), 1966. N.Z. Geol. Surv. Bull. 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, (R. G.), 1967. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1247.Google Scholar
Coleman, (R. G.), 1971. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 1212-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, (R. G.), and Keith, (T. E.), 1971. J. Petrol. 12, 311-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condie (K. C.), and Madison, (J. A.), 1969. Am. Mineral. 54, I 173-9.Google Scholar
De, (A.), 1972. Mere. Geol. Soc. Am. 132, 489-501.Google Scholar
Duffield, (W. A.) and Beeson, (M. H.), 1973. J. Res. U.S. Geol. Surv. 1, 665-72.Google Scholar
Finlayson, (A. M.), 1909. Q. J. Geol. Soc. 65, 351-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, (M. D.), 1962. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 414A, 133.Google Scholar
Francis, (G. H.), 1955. Geol. Mag. 92, 433-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grange, (L. I.), 1927. Trans. N.Z. Institute, 58, 160-6.Google Scholar
Green, (D. H.), 1964. J. Petrol. 5, 134-88. Gresens, (R. L.), 1969. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 24,93-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, (D. H.), 1970. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 81, 307-10.Google Scholar
Henderson, (J.) and Ongley (M), 1923. N.Z. Geol. Surv. Bull. 24.Google Scholar
Hess, (H. H.) and Otalara, (G.), 1964. Nat. Acad. Sci. Natural Res. Council Pub. 1188, 152-68.Google Scholar
Honnorez, (J.) and Kirst, (P.), 1975. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 49, 233-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetler, (P. B.), Coleman, (R. G.), Mumpton, (F. A.), and Evans, (B. W.), 1966. Am. Mineral. 51, 75-98.Google Scholar
Imai, (N.), Otsuka, (R.), Chihara, (K.), Tadaharu, (N.), and Tanaka, (K.), 1972. J. Jap. Assn Mineral. Petrol. Econ. Geol. 67, 63-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, (T. N.), 1965. Canad. J. Earth Sci. 2, 648-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, (W.), 1969. Am. J. Sci. 267, 1083-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolesnik, (Yu. N.), 1974a. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. 211, 117-79. (English transl.)Google Scholar
Kolesnik, (Yu. N.), 1974b. Int. Geol. Rev. 10, t 109-08.Google Scholar
Kolesnik, (Yu. N.) and Guletskaya, (E. S.), 1970. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. 194, 134-7. (English translation.)Google Scholar
Korzhinskii, (D. S.), 1965. Am. J. Sci. 263, 193-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korzhinskii, (D. S.), 1968. Mineralium Deposita, 3, 222-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrabee, (D. N.), 1969. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1283.Google Scholar
Leach, (T. M.) and Rodgers, (K. A.), 1977. Mineral. Mag. 41, 394-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, (J. G.), 1971. Am. Mineral. 56, 507-31.Google Scholar
Loney, (R. A.), Himmelberg, (G. R.), and Coleman, (R. G.), 1971. J. Petrol. 12, 245-309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, (D. B.), 1960. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 71, 303-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, (P.), 1907. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 40, 320-2.Google Scholar
Martin, (B.) and Fyfe, (W. S.), 1970. Chem. Geol. 6, 185202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashiro, (A.), 1975. J. Geol. 83, 249-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
N∼mec, (O.), 1966. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 12, 340-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nockolds, (S. R.), 1954. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 65, 1007-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, (J. P.) and Rodgers, (K. A.), 1973a. J. R. Soc. N.Z. 3, 169-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, (J. P.) 1973b. Mineral. Mag. 39, 233-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, (J. P.) and Rodgers, (K. A.), 1974. J. R. Soc. N.Z. 4, 141-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabst, (A.), Gross, (E. B.), and Alfors, (J. T.) 1967. Am. Mineral. 52, 336-51.Google Scholar
Parsons, (A. L.), *924. Univ. Toronto Geol. Set. 17, 55-7.Google Scholar
Pistorius, (C. W. F. T.), 1963. Am. J. Sci. 261, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qaiser, (M. A.), Akhter, (S. M.), and Khan, (A. H.), 1969. Mineral. Mag. 37, 736-7.Google Scholar
Rodgers, (K. A.), 1973. Ibid. 39, 326-39.Google Scholar
Rodgers, (K. A.), 1976. Bull. Bur. Rech. Min. (Deuxieme Serie), Sec. IV, no. I, 33-56.Google Scholar
Rubenach, (M. J.), 1974. J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 21, 91-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlocker, (J.), 1960. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 400B, 311-12.Google Scholar
Seki, (Y.), 1965. Jap. J. Geol. Geogr. 36, 16.Google Scholar
Seki, (Y.), Aiba, (M.), and Kato, (O.), 1960. Am. Mineral. 45, 668-79.Google Scholar
Spooner, (E. T. C.) and Fyfe, (W. A.), 1973. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 42, 287-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, (J.), 1953. J. Fac. Ski. Hokkaido Univ. 4, 419-30.Google Scholar
Thayer, (T. P.), 1966. Am. Mineral. 51, 685-710.Google Scholar
Thayer, (T. P.), 1969. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 80, 1515-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velde, (B.), 1973. Mineral. Mag. 39, 297-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoogen, (J.), 1962. Am. J. Sci. 260, 211-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidale, (R.), 1969. Ibid. 267, 857-74.Google Scholar
Vidale, (R.), and Hewitt, (D. A.), 1973. Am. Mineral. 58, 99/7.Google Scholar
Watson, (K. D.), 1953. Ibid. 38, 197206.Google Scholar
Weiner, (D. B.) and Taylor, (H. P.), 1973. Am. J. Sci. 273, 207-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, (H. S.), 1950. J. Geol. 58, 221-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar