Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:34:00.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manganese-bearing silicate minerals from metamorphosed manganese formations of India. I. Juddite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Supriya Roy*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Jadavpur University, Calcutta 32, India

Summary

The manganiferous amphibole juddite has been reported by a number of workers from metamorphosed manganese formations of India. The mineral is developed at the contact of pegmatite and gondite, and associated characteristically with blanfordite (manganoan aegirine-augite) and winchite (manganoan richterite-tremolite). The range of the refractive indices of the mineral and the orientation of the optic axial plane normal to (010) suggest the mineral to be of magnesioriebeckite composition. The 100 Mn2+:(Mn2++Mg+Fe2+) and 100 Fe3+:(Fe3++Alvi+Ti) ratios plotted in the glaucophane-magnesioriebeckite diagram show that eight out of nine analyses (eight new) are grouped under magnesioriebeckite composition range. It may thus be concluded that the juddites generally refer to (manganoan) magnesioriebeckite compositions. In some cases, however, the composition of juddite shows considerable departure from ideal magnesioriebeckite composition and the juddite and winchite (manganoan tremolite-richterite) show evidences of compositional transition, indicating partial miscibility. The juddites have been formed by the interaction of pegmatitic fluid on manganese ore, gondite, and other country rocks such as mica schists and diopside-forsterite marble.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bilgrami, (S. A.), 1955. Min. Mag. 30, 633-44.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, (A.), 1969. Quart. Journ. Geol. Min. Met. Soc. India, 41, 25-35.Google Scholar
Coleman, (R. G.) and Papike, (J. J.), 1968. Journ. Petrology, 9, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, (J. E.), 1949. Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, 51, 77-80 [M.A. 11-17].Google Scholar
Deer, (W. A.), Howie, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1963. Rock-forming Minerals, 2, Chain Silicates. London (Longmans).Google Scholar
Ernst, (W. G.), 1960. Geoehimica Acta, 19, 10-40 [M.A. 15-526 ].10.1016/0016-7037(60)90123-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermor, (L. L.), 1909. Mere. Geol. Surv. India, 37.Google Scholar
Klein, (C.), 1966. Journ. Petrology, 7, 246-305.10.1093/petrology/7.2.246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashiro, (A.), 1957. Journ. Fac. Sci., Univ. Tokyo, Sec. 2, 11, 57-83 [M.A. 14-144].Google Scholar
Miyashiro, (A.)and Iwasaki, (M.), 1957. Journ. Geol. Soc. Japan, 63, 698-703 [M.A. 14-145l.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, (V. K.), 1961. Min. Mag. 32, 736-7.Google Scholar
Nayak, (V. K.) and Neuvonen, (K. J.), 1963. Compt. rend. soc. géol. Finlande, 35, 27-37 [M.A. 16-645].Google Scholar
Roy, (Supriya), 1966. Syngenetic Manganese Formations of India. Jadavpur University, pp. 102-35 [M.A. 17-650].Google Scholar
Roy, (Supriya) 1969a. Proc. Ind. Sci. Congr. (Abstract), 56th Session, 200-1.Google Scholar
Roy, (Supriya) 1969b. Ibid. 200.Google Scholar
Roy, (Supriya) and Mitra, (F. N.), 1964. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, 30, 395-438 [M.A. 17-392].Google Scholar
Roy, (Supriya) and Purkait, (P. K.), 1968. Contr. Min. Petr. 20, 86-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, (J.) and Suzuki, (Y.), 1959. Journ. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido University, ser. 4, 10, 349.Google Scholar
Zwaan, (P. C.) and Van Der Plas, (L.), 1958. Proe. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. 61B, 265-77.Google Scholar