Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:28:41.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrobasaluminite and basaluminite from Chickerell, Dorset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

T. Clayton
T. Clayton*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO9 5NH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Hydrobasaluminite and basaluminite, two hydrated basic aluminium sulphate minerals have been found in the weathering zone of the Oxford Clay at Crook Hill Brickyard, Chickerell, near Weymouth, Dorset. Hydrobasaluminite occurs as a reaction rim surrounding carbonate concretions, and is believed to have resulted from the neutralization of aluminium-bearing acid sulphate solutions formed by oxidation of pyrite and subsequent leaching of clay. Basaluminite is found only on concretions that have fallen to the floor of the pit, suggesting that it is formed as a dehydration product of hydrobasaluminite.

Chemical analysis of hydrobasaluminite yields the composition 2Al2O3 · SO3 · 20H2O, although this almost certainly includes substantial amounts of adsorbed water. Chemical analysis of basaluminite gives the composition 2Al2O3 · SO3 · 9H2O, which is equivalent to a formula of Al4SO4(OH)10 · 4H2O if it assumed that water is present only as water molecules or hydroxyl ions. The sulphate ions are readily exchangeable. Electron-optical and X-ray powder diffraction data show the minerals to be monoclinic rather than hexagonal as previously reported. Indexed X-ray powder patterns give unit-cell parameters of a = 14.911(5) Å, b = 9.993(2) Å, c = 13.640(5) Å, β = 112.40(4)° for hydrobasaluminite and a = 14.857(3) Å, b = 10.011(3) Å, c = 11.086(7) Å, β = 122.28(3)° for basaluminite. The specific gravity of basaluminite is found to be 2.10 and Z = 4.

Hydrobasaluminite dehydrates irreversibly to basaluminite under normal laboratory conditions, but can be preserved indefinitely at high relative humidity. A study of the dehydration of basaluminite using a diffractometer heating-stage shows the presence of three further distinct hydration states as well as interstratified intermediates. The dehydrations occur topotactically and involve major changes in the c* direction only. DTA and TGA curves can be interpreted in terms of progressive dehydration.

It is suggested that the minerals possess a layer structure, probably containing gibbsite-like double-hydroxide layers with interlayer sulphate ions and water molecules. The data also seem to show a close structural relationship between basaluminite and the hydrated basic aluminium carbonate mineral, scarbroite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 43 , Issue 331 , September 1980 , pp. 931 - 937
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, (F) and Rawajfih, (Z.), 1977. Soil Sol. Soe. Amer. J., 41, 686-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkell, (w. J.), 1947. The Geology of the country around Weymouth, Swanage , Corfe and Lulworth. H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Ball, (D.F.), 1969. Mineral.Mag., 37, 291-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, (F. A.) and Hollingworth, (S.E.), 1948. Nature, 162, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, (H.) and Goodwin, (T. H.), 1949. J. Chem. Soc., 1969, 2239-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, (G.W.) and Comer, (J. J.), 1960. Mineral,Mag., 32, 363-5.Google Scholar
Brydon, (J. E.) and Singh, (S. S.), 1969. Can. Mineral., 9, 644-54.Google Scholar
Davey, (P. T.), Lukaszewaki, (G. M.) and Scott, (T. R.), 1963. Aust. J. Appl. Sci., 14, 137-56.Google Scholar
Duffin, (W.J.) and Goodyear, (J.), 1960. Mineral.Mag., 92, 353-62.Google Scholar
Fominykh, (N .Y .). 1965 [Tr. Inst. Geol. Akad Nauk SSSR, Ural'sk. Filial, 70, 193-5] ; abstr, in Chem. Abstr.,1966, 64, 12370.Google Scholar
Frondel, (C.), 1968. Amer. Mineral., 55, 17-21.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, (S. E.) and Bannister, (F.A.), 1950. Miueral.Mag., 29, 1-17.Google Scholar
Hayden, (P.L) and Ruhln, (A. J.), 1974. In Rubin, (A.J.)(ed.), Aqueous-Environmental Chemistry of Metals, 317-81.Google Scholar
Hsu, (P. H.) and Bates, (T. F.), 1964, Mineral.Mag., 33, 749-68.Google Scholar
Jackson, (J.O.), 1973. Clay Mineral., 10, 113-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannson, (G.), 1963. Ark. Kemi., 20, 321-62.Google Scholar
Milton, (C.), Conant, (L. C.) and Swanson, (V.E.), 1955. Geol. Soc. Amer, Bull., 66, 805-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, (R.S.), 1970. Mineral.Rec. 1, 127-8.Google Scholar
Sabelli, (C.) and Ferroni, (R.T.), 1978. Acta Caystallogr. B34 2407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srebrodol'skiy, (B. I.), 1969. Dokl. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Earth Sci. Sect., 180, 122-3.Google Scholar
Sumderman, (J. A.) and Beck, (C. W.), 1969. Anat. Mineral, 54, 1363-73.Google Scholar
Tien, (P.), 1968. Amer.Mineral., 53, 722-32.Google Scholar
Wieser, (T.). 1974 [Min. Polonica, 5, 55-66] ; abstr in M.A. 77-251.Google Scholar