Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:21:05.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fractures induced by shock in quartz and feldspar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

P. Lambert
P. Lambert*
Affiliation:
2, rue des Jacinthes, Apt. 992, 45100 Orléans, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study is devoted to fractures produced by natural and artificial shock processes in non-porous rocks consisting essentially of quartz and feldspar. Petrological and textural investigations were performed using optical and scanning electron microscopic techniques. A microfracturation index is adapted from Short (1966, 1968a, b) in order to compare the fracture densities in different materials shocked in different ways. In all cases, the density of fractures in quartz and feldspar increases with increasing pressure to about 200 kb. At higher pressure this trend is reversed. Fracturing is more intense in feldspar than in quartz. Plane shock waves produced in laboratory scale experiments induce more fracturing than natural shock waves. However, such an increase is no larger than the scatter among the data and the experimental technique used in the laboratory can be considered realistic in terms of fracturing. Finally the correlation between pressure and fracture density is too poor to be of use for quantitative pressure calibrations of naturally shocked materials.

There is no direct correlation between the density of fractures and the number of planar elements observed. There is a negative correlation between fracturing and formation of diaplectic glass, Diaplectic glasses are remarkably weakly fractured compared with shocked minerals. The abrupt change in the slope of the curve giving the dependency of the density of fractures with pressure corresponds to the pressure at which diaplectic glass is formed. From petrographic considerations it is deduced that fracturing occurs at the end of the shock sequence, on pressure release, while diaplectic glasses are forming or already formed. Hypotheses of mechanical and thermal fracturing are examined; both are plausible, but a thermal origin may be preferred. The mechanism of formation of diaplectic glass is discussed with respect to results and deductions obtained by the study of fracturing. Diaplectic glass could represent a decompressed highdensity glass resulting from a single state transformation of a mineral, at high pressure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 43 , Issue 328 , December 1979 , pp. 527 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrens, (T. J.), Anderson, (D. L.), and Ringwood, (A. E.), 1969. Rev. Geophys. Res. 75, 518.Google Scholar
Anan'in, (A. V.), Breusov, (O. N.), Dremin, (A. N.), Pershin, (S. V.), and Tatsü, (V. F.), 1974. Translation Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, 10. 3, 426-36.Google Scholar
Borg, (I. Y.), 1972. In Flow and fracture of rocks, Heard, (H. C.), Borg, (I. Y.), Carter, (N. L.), Raleigh, (C. B.) (eds.). Geophysical Mono.graph series, 293.Google Scholar
De Carli, (P. S.) and Milton, (D. J.), 1965. Science, 147, 144-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, (W. V.) and Bertsch, (W.), 1969. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 20, 203-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, (J.), 1972. CEA Rapport R. 4257.Google Scholar
Grady, (D. E.) and Murri, (W. J.), 1976. Geophys. Res. Letters. 3, 8, 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, (D. E.) and Fowles, (G. R.), 2974. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 2, 332.Google Scholar
Grady, (D. E.) 1977. In High Pressure Research, Application in Geophysics. Acad. Press, 389-437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörz, (F.), 1969. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 21, 365-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanel, (G. I.), Molodets, (A. M.), and Dremin, (A. N.), 1977. Transl. Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, 13. 6, 906-12.Google Scholar
Klein, (M. J.), 1965. Phil. Mag. 12, 735-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, (P.), 1977. Thèse Doct. Etat, Univ. Paris-Sud, Orsay, 515 pp.Google Scholar
Lambert, (P.) 1979. In Lunar and Planetary Science X, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas, 694-6.Google Scholar
Robertson, (P. B.), Dence, (M. R.), and Vos, (M. A.), 1968. In Shock metamorphism of natural materials, French, (B. M.) and Short, (N. M.) (eds.). Mono., Baltimore, Md., 433-52.Google Scholar
Short, (N. M.), 1966. J. Geophys. Res. 71, 1195-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, (N. M.) 1968a. In Shock metamorphism of natural materials, French, (B. M.) and Short, (N. M.) (eds.), 185-210.Google Scholar
Short, (N. M.) 1968b. In Shock metamorphism of natural materials, French, (B. M.) and Short, (N. M.) (eds.), 219-41.Google Scholar
Siegfried, (R. W.), Simmons, (G.), Richter, (D.), and Hörz, (F.), 1977. In Proc. 8th Lunar Sci. Conf. 1249-70.Google Scholar
Simmons, (G.), Siegfried, (R. W.), and Richter, (D.), 1975. In Proc. 6th Lunar Sci. Conf. 3227-54.Google Scholar
Stöflter, (D.), 1972. Fortschr. Mineral. 49, 50-113.Google Scholar
Stöflter, (D.) 1974. Fortschr. Mineral. 51. 2, 256-89.Google Scholar