Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T03:52:05.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forsterite chondrites; the meteorites Kakangari, Mount Morris (Wisconsin), Pontlyfni, and Winona

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. L. Graham ,
A. J. Easton  and
R. Hutchison
A. L. Graham
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
A. J. Easton
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
R. Hutchison
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pontlyfni and Mount Morris (Wisconsin) are briefly described. Chondrule structure is absent from both, the latter is coarsely crystalline and both are sulphide-rich and contain forsterite and enstatite. Kakangari has well-defined chondrules; its silicate and sulphide minerals are unequilibrated, but similar to those of Pont-lyfni and Mount Morris (Wisconsin). New bulk chemical analyses are presented; Pontlyfni has 33·84 % total Fe and 7·04 % S; Mount Morris (Wisconsin) has 19·88 % total Fe and 4·72 % S; and Kakangari has 22·79 % total Fe and 5·30 % S. These three meteorites, together with Winona, have ordinary chondritic Mg/Si ratios, which result in their having abundant forsterite; this distinguishes them from E-chondrites. The four meteorites have Mg/Si ratios lower than those of C-chondrites, and they are more reduced than C or ordinary chondrites. These four unusual stones, therefore, have some chemical similarities, for example all have Mg/Si (atomic) of about 0·95, mean olivine composition ranging from Fa1 to Fa5, and significant Cr in the sulphide. Cumberland Fails chondritic xenoliths and other exotic fragments in polymict meteorites may be related to the four stones, which may ultimately prove to belong to a distinct chemical group of chondrites related to the irons of Group IAB.

These meteorites are described and discussed together because they have similarities in mineralogy, bulk composition, and oxidation state. All have more than 10 % forsterite (i.e. an olivine in the range Fa0·10). In our study we investigated the mineral chemistry of, first, Kakangari (Graham and Hutchison, 1974), and then Mount Morris (Wisconsin), with cursory examination of the previously described Winona (Mason and Jarosewich, 1967) and Cumberland Falls chondritic fraction (Binns, 1969; Jarosewich, 1967). By chance, the British Museum (Natural History) acquired the Pontlyfni stone during the course of this work. Pontlyfni fell in Wales in 1931, but is so far undescribed; it proved to be chemically and mineralogically similar to Kakangari. We thank Mr. J. R. Owen, the original owner, for its timely addition to the Museum's Collection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 41 , Issue 318 , June 1977 , pp. 201 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrens, (L. H.), 1970. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 10, I.Google Scholar
Binns, (R. A.), 1969. A chondritic inclusion of unique type in the Cumberland Falls meteorite, pp. 696–704, in Meteorite Research, Millman, P. M., ed. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland).Google Scholar
Buchwald, (V. F.), 1975. Handbook of Iron Meteorites, University of California Press (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London).Google Scholar
Clayton, (R. N.), Onuma, (N.), and Mayeda, (T. K.), 1976. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 30, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, (A. M.), Ganapathy, (R.), and Grossman, (L.), 1977a. Nature, 265, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, (A. M.), Ganapathy, (R.), and Grossman, (L.), 1977b. Earth planet. Sci. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
Fredricksson, (K.), Nelen, (J.), and Fredricksson, (B. J.), 1968. The LL-group chondrites, pp. 457-466, in Origin and Distribution of the Elements, Ahrens, L. H., ed. (Pcrgamon, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, (A. L.) and Hutchison, (R.), 1974. Nature, 251, 128.Google Scholar
Hey, (M. H.), 1966. Catalogue of Meteorites (British Museum (Natural History), London).Google Scholar
Jarosewich, (E.), 1967. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 31, 1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, (K.), 1968. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 6945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, (B.), 1971. Handbook of Elemental abundances in Meteorites (Gordon and Breach, New York).Google Scholar
Mason, (B.) and Jarosewich, (E.), 1967. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 31, 1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, (B.) and Wiik, (H. B.), 1966. Am. Mus. Novit. 2272, 9.Google Scholar
Mason, (P. K.), Frost, (M. T.), and Reed, (S. J. B.), 1969. Nat. Phys. Lab. I.M.S. Report, 1.Google Scholar
Moss, (A. A.), Hey, (M. H.), Elliott, (C. J.), and Easton, (A. J.), 1967. Mineral. Mag. 36, 101.Google Scholar
Van Schmus, (W. R.) and Ribbc, (P. H.), 1968. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 32, 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Schmus, (W. R.) and Wood, (J. A.), 1967. Ibid. 31, 747.Google Scholar