Occurrence

Ferriandrosite-(Ce) was found at the Július metamorphosed manganese ore occurrence, which is located on the NE slopes of the Turecká hill (953 m a.s.l.), ~1.4 km WSW of the Betliar village, Rožňava Co., Košice Region, Slovak Republic. Samples with ferriandrosite-(Ce) were collected on September 17, 2019, by one of the authors (MS) from the dump of the main exploration adit (48°41'53.3“N, 20°29'20.1”E).

The Július manganese ore occurrence is situated in the Spišsko-gemerské rudohorie Mts. Small bodies and lenses of metamorphosed carbonate–silicate manganese ore mineralisation are known from several localities in the Spišsko-gemerské rudohorie Mts. (e.g. Čučma-Čierna baňa, Smolník-Hekerová, Betliar-Július), and are hosted in Lower Palaeozoic black phyllites and lydites of the Gelnica Group (Gemeric Unit), metamorphosed in greenschist-facies conditions (Kantor, Reference Kantor1954; Bajaník et al., Reference Bajaník, Ivanička, Mello, Pristaš, Reichwalder, Snopko, Vozár and Vozárová1983; Faryad, Reference Faryad1994; Grecula et al., Reference Grecula, Abonyi, Abonyiová, Antaš, Bartalský, Bartalský, Dianiška, Ďuďa, Gargulák, Gazdačko, Hudáček, Kobulský, Lörincz, Macko, Návesňák, Németh, Novotný, Radvanec, Rojkovič, Rozložník, Varček and Zlocha1995; Rojkovič, Reference Rojkovič2001; Peterec and Ďuďa, Reference Peterec and Ďuďa2003). According to Rojkovič (Reference Rojkovič2001), mineral associations composed of Mn carbonates and silicates in the Spišsko-gemerské rudohorie Mts., mainly represented by rhodochrosite, rhodonite, pyroxmangite, spessartine, tephroite and magnetite, were formed during Variscan metamorphism of sedimentary–diagenetic manganese proto-ores. Subsequent metamorphic–hydrothermal veinlets with quartz, calcite and sulfides represent younger mineralisation stages, probably related to the Alpine orogeny. Ore mineralisation at the Július occurrence was explored in a small scale for manganese and iron in the second half of the 19^th century (Maderspach, Reference Maderspach1875). In contrast with the nearby and very similar Čučma-Čierna baňa or Smolník-Hekerová manganese deposit, the mineralogy of the small Július manganese ore occurrence was never studied in detail. Maderspach (Reference Maderspach1875) briefly mentioned rhodonite, rhodochrosite, magnetite, pyrite, ‘wad’ and ‘psilomelane’ as principal ore minerals. Ferriandrosite-(Ce) was discovered in a large block of rhodochrosite–spessartine–pyroxmangite–magnetite ore, cut by abundant younger veinlets consisting mainly of coarse crystalline pyroxmangite and spessartine, with minor amounts of quartz, rhodochrosite, baryte and pyrosmalite-(Mn). It occurs rarely as aggregates embedded in pyroxmangite–spessartine veinlets together with rhodochrosite, quartz, baryte and pyrosmalite-(Mn). Its origin is probably due to an Alpine metamorphic–hydrothermal event, favouring the remobilisation of Mn and REE in the Július manganese ore deposit.

Physical and optical properties

Ferriandrosite-(Ce) occurs as subhedral grains and polycrystalline aggregates up to 0.3 mm in size (Figs 1, 2), enclosed in pyroxmangite–spessartine matrix. Ferriandrosite-(Ce) is dark brown, with a light-brown streak and vitreous lustre and it is non-fluorescent in shortwave and longwave ultraviolet light. The Mohs hardness is estimated at ~6½ to 7 based on analogy to other members of the allanite group. It is brittle, with no observable cleavage or fracture. A density of 4.321 g⋅cm^–3 was calculated using the unit-cell volume refined from the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and empirical chemical formula.

Figure 1. Dark brown aggregate of ferriandrosite-(Ce) enclosed in pyroxmangite (light pink)–spessartine (light yellow) matrix. Field of view is 2.06 mm. Photo L. Hrdlovič. Holotype material (P1P 2/2023, polished section Be-5).

Figure 2. Aggregates and subhedral grains of ferriandrosite-(Ce) (white) enclosed in pyroxmangite (light grey) associated with euhedral crystals of spessartine (dark grey). The red box indicates the area where the grain used for single-crystal X-ray diffraction was picked up. Back-scattered electron (BSE) photo T. Mikuš. Holotype material (P1P 2/2023, polished section Be-5).

Ferriandrosite-(Ce) is optically biaxial (+), with weak pleochroism and high surface relief. Other optical properties were not measured because of relatively strong compositional zoning of the studied aggregates and the presence of intimate intergrowths between the two distinct members of the epidote supergroup. In agreement with Armbruster et al. (Reference Armbruster, Bonazzi, Akasaka, Bermanec, Chopin, Gieré, Heuss-Assbichler, Liebscher, Menchetti, Pan and Pasero2006), it is recognised that optical data can be ambiguous and have some limitations in identifying some chemically complex minerals like those belonging to the allanite group. The mean refractive index of ferriandrosite-(Ce), obtained from the Gladstone–Dale relationship (Mandarino, Reference Mandarino1979, Reference Mandarino1981) using ideal end-member formula and calculated density is 1.832.

Chemical composition

Quantitative chemical (wavelength dispersive spectroscopy) analyses of ferriandrosite-(Ce) were carried out using a JEOL-JXA850F electron microprobe (Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia). The following conditions were applied: accelerating voltage 15 kV, probe current 20 nA, counting time 20s on peak and 10s for background. The diameter of the electron beam ranged from 2–4 μm; ZAF correction was used. The following standards, X-ray lines and crystals were used: diopside (CaKα, PETL and MgKα, TAP); UO₂ (UMβ, PETL); orthoclase (KKα, PETL and SiKα, TAP); thorianite (ThMα, PETL); tugtupite (ClKα, PETL); crocoite (PbMβ, PETL); YPO₄ (YLα, PETL); fluorite (FKα, LDE1); albite (NaKα, TAP and AlKα, TAP); LaPO₄ (LaLα, LIFH); CePO₄ (CeLα, LIFH); NdPO₄ (NdLα, LIFH); PrPO₄ (PrLβ, LIFH); EuPO₄ (EuLα, LIFH); SmPO₄ (SmLβ, LIFH); TbPO₄ (TbLα, LIFH); GdPO₄ (GdLβ, LIFH); ErPO₄ (ErLα, LIFH); TmPO₄ (TmLα, LIFH); DyPO₄ (DyLβ, LIFH); YbPO₄ (YbLα, LIFH); HoPO₄ (HoLβ, LIFH); LuPO₄ (LuLα, LIFH); hematite (FeKα, LIF); rhodonite (MnKα, LIF); Cr₂O₃ (CrKα, LIF); ScVO₄ (VKα, LIF); and rutile (TiKα, LIF). The detection limit (1σ) of every element ranged from 61–881 ppm. REE interferences were solved by overlap corrections as well as F / Fe and F / Ce X-ray line coincidences.

As shown by back-scattered electron images (Fig. 3), the sample studied is chemically zoned. Four different chemical domains were identified. One of them corresponds to the chemical domain (‘domain A’) characterised through single-crystal X-ray diffraction and its chemical data are given in Table 1 (average of 4 spot analyses). The content of Fe₂O₃ and FeO and the amount of H₂O were recalculated in order to achieve 8 (A+M+T) atoms per formula unit (pfu). If the full oxidation of Fe is not sufficient, then Mn is also partially oxidised.

Figure 3. Back-scattered electron (BSE) image showing the chemical inhomogeneity of the material studied. Different chemical domains are shown. Domains C/D are hardly distinguishable in BSE, owing to similar grey hues. BSE photo T. Mikuš.

Table 1. Electron microprobe data (in wt.%) of ferriandrosite-(Ce) (domains A–C) and associated vielleaureite-(Ce) (domain D).

Notes: e.s.d. = estimated standard deviation. The symbol ‘–’ indicates that the chemical constituent was below the detection limit.

¹ Calculated to yield 8 (A+M+T) cations.

² Calculated to yield 1 OH group per formula unit.

The empirical formula of ferriandrosite-(Ce), based on 13 anions pfu, distributing the chemical constituents among different structural sites, in agreement with the crystal structure refinement (see below), is (with rounding errors and REE* corresponding to minor REE) ^{A 1}(Mn²⁺_0.63Ca_0.35Ce_0.02)_Σ1.00 ^{A 2}(Ce_0.53La_0.27Nd_0.14Pr_0.05REE*_0.01)_Σ1.00 ^{M 1}(Fe³⁺_0.41Al_0.12V³⁺_0.01Mg_0.40Ti_0.05)_Σ0.99 ^{M 2}Al_1.00 ^{M 3}(Mn²⁺_0.75Fe²⁺_0.22Mg_0.03)_Σ1.00 ^{T 1–3}Si_3.00O₁₁^O4(O_0.67F_0.33)(OH). It corresponds to a ideal formula of ferriandrosite-(Ce) of MnCeFe³⁺AlMn²⁺(Si₂O₇)(SiO₄)O(OH).

Table 1 also reports the average compositions of the other three domains (B, C, and D). The crystal chemical formulae for these three domains are the following:

$$\eqalign{& {\rm domain\ B}\colon \cr& ^{A1}( {{\rm M}{\rm n}^{2 + }_{0.55} {\rm Ca}_{0.45}^\phantom{0.00}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}{}^{A2} ( {{\rm C}{\rm e}_{0.54}{\rm L}{\rm a}_{0.26}{\rm N}{\rm d}_{0.14}{\rm P}{\rm r}_{0.05}{\rm RE}{\rm E}^\ast_{0.01} } ) _{\Sigma 1.00}\cr& ^{M1} ( {{\rm F}{\rm e}^{3 + }_{0.73} {\rm A}{\rm l}_{0.02}{\rm V}^{3 + }_{0.01} {\rm M}{\rm g}_{0.10}{\rm F}{\rm e}^{2 + }_{0.07} {\rm T}{\rm i}_{0.06}} ) _{\Sigma 0.99}{}^{M2} {\rm A}{\rm l}_{1.00}\cr&^{M3} ( {{\rm M}{\rm n}^{2 + }_{0.63} {\rm F}{\rm e}^{2 + }_{0.31}} {{\rm M}{\rm g}_{0.06}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}{}^{T1\ndash 3} {\rm S}{\rm i}_{3.00}{\rm O}_{11}{}^{{\rm O}4} ( {{\rm O}_{0.90}{\rm F}_{0.10}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}( {{\rm OH}} ) ; \;}$$

$${\eqalign{& {\rm domain\ C}\colon\cr& ^{A1}( {{\rm M}{\rm n}^{2 + }_{0.69} {\rm C}{\rm a}_{0.31}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}{}^{A2} ( {{\rm C}{\rm e}_{0.50}{\rm L}{\rm a}_{0.24}{\rm N}{\rm d}_{0.16}{\rm P}{\rm r}_{0.05}{\rm RE}{\rm E}^\ast_{0.01} {\rm C}{\rm a}_{0.04}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}\cr&^{M1} \hskip -1pt( {{\rm F}{\rm e}^{3 + }_{0.37} {\rm A}{\rm l}_{0.25}{\rm M}{\rm n}^{3 + }_{0.13} {\rm M}{\rm g}_{0.24}\hskip -1.5pt{\rm T}{\rm i}_{0.01}} \hskip -.8pt) \hskip -.2pt_{\Sigma 1.00}{}^{M2} {\rm A}{\rm l}_{1.00}{}^{M3} \hskip -.6pt( {{\rm M}{\rm n}^{2 + }_{0.82} {\rm M}{\rm g}_{0.18}} \hskip -.5pt) _{\Sigma 1.00}\cr&^{T1\ndash 3} ( {{\rm S}{\rm i}_{2.97}{\rm A}{\rm l}_{0.03}} ) _{\Sigma 3.00}{\rm O}_{11}{}^{{\rm O}4} ( {{\rm O}_{0.70}{\rm F}_{0.30}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}( {{\rm OH}} ) ; \;}}$$

$${\eqalign{& {\rm domain\ D}\colon\cr& ^{A1}( {{\rm M}{\rm n}^{2 + }_{0.78} {\rm C}{\rm a}_{0.21}{\rm C}{\rm e}_{0.01}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}{}^{A2} ( {{\rm C}{\rm e}_{0.52}{\rm L}{\rm a}_{0.26}{\rm N}{\rm d}_{0.15}{\rm P}{\rm r}_{0.06}{\rm RE}{\rm E}^\ast_{0.01} } ) _{\Sigma 1.00}\cr&^{M1} \hskip -.8pt ( \hskip -.2pt{{\rm M}{\rm g}_{0.51}{\rm M}{\rm n}^{3 + }_{0.27} {\rm F}{\rm e}^{3 + }_{0.17} {\rm A}{\rm l}_{0.03}\hskip -1.2pt{\rm T}{\rm i}_{0.01}} \hskip -.5pt) _{\Sigma 1.00}{}\hskip -.7pt^{M2}\hskip -1.8pt {\rm A}{\rm l}_{1.00}{}\hskip -.7pt^{M3} \hskip -1pt( \hskip -.2pt{{\rm M}{\rm n}^{2 + }_{0.70} {\rm M}{\rm g}_{0.30}} \hskip -.5pt) _{\Sigma 1.00}\cr&^{T1\ndash 3} ( {{\rm S}{\rm i}_{2.96}{\rm A}{\rm l}_{0.04}} ) _{\Sigma 3.00}{\rm O}_{11}{}^{{\rm O}4} ( {{\rm F}_{0.53}{\rm O}_{0.47}} ) _{\Sigma 1.00}( {{\rm OH}} ).}}$$

Domains B and C correspond to the end-member formula MnCeFe³⁺AlMn²⁺(Si₂O₇)(SiO₄)O(OH), i.e. to ferriandrosite-(Ce), however domain D leads to end-member formula MnCeMgAlMn²⁺(Si₂O₇)(SiO₄)F(OH) and corresponds to a recently approved new member of the dollaseite group, vielleaureite-(Ce) (Ragu et al., Reference Ragu, Bindi, Bonazzi and Chopin2023). The domains A and B can be easily distinguished in back-scattered electron images, whereas C and D domains have similar grey hues. In the material studied, there is a clear positive correlation between Mg and F contents, in agreement with the substitution ^{M 1}Fe³⁺ + ^O4O^2– = ^{M 1}Mg²⁺ + ^O4F^– (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Relationship between F and Mg atoms per formula unit (apfu). Different colours correspond to the chemical homogenous domains: A = orange, B = green, C = red and D = violet.

X-ray diffraction study and structural refinements

Single-crystal X-ray intensity data were collected using a Bruker D8 Venture four-circle diffractometer equipped with an air-cooled Photon III detector, and microfocus MoKα radiation. The detector-to-crystal distance was set to 38 mm. Data were collected using φ scan modes, in 0.5° slices, with an exposure time of 30 s per frame. A total of 1644 frames were collected and they were integrated with the Bruker SAINT software package using a narrow-frame algorithm. Data were corrected for Lorentz-polarisation, absorption, and background using the package of software Apex4 (Bruker AXS, 2022). Unit-cell parameters were refined on the basis of the XYZ centroids of 9895 reflections above 20 σ_I with 7.898° < 2θ < 66.315°. Ferriandrosite-(Ce) is monoclinic, space group P2₁/m (#11), with the following unit-cell parameters: a = 8.8483(4) Å, b = 5.7307(3) Å c = 10.0314(5) Å, β = 113.3659(15)°, V = 10.0314(5) ų and Z = 2.

The crystal structure of ferriandrosite-(Ce) was refined using Shelxl-2018 (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2015) starting from the atomic coordinates of ferriakasakaite-(Ce) (Biagioni et al., Reference Biagioni, Bonazzi, Pasero, Zaccarini, Balestra, Bracco and Ciriotti2019). The position of the H atoms was located through the difference-Fourier map. The following scattering curves for neutral atoms, taken from the International Tables for Crystallography (Wilson, Reference Wilson1992), were used: Mn vs. Ca at A1, Ce vs. Ca at A2, Fe vs. Mg at M1, Al vs. Fe at M2, Mn vs. Mg at M3, Si at T1–T3 sites, H at the H10 site, and O at all the O sites but the O4 position, whose site occupancy was modelled using the scattering curves of O vs. F. Refinement of the O/F atomic ratio pointed to O_0.65(6)F_0.35(5), in agreement with the electron microprobe data. The anisotropic structural model (only H was refined isotropically) converged to R = 0.0210 for 1910 reflections with F _o > 4σ(F _o) and 127 refined parameters.

Details of data collection and refinement are given in Table 2. Fractional atom coordinates and equivalent isotropic or isotropic displacement parameters are reported in Table 3. Table 4 reports selected bond distances, whereas Table 5 compares observed and calculated mean atomic numbers at the A1, A2 and M1–M3 sites of ferriandrosite-(Ce). Finally, Table 6 gives the weighted bond-valence calculations obtained using the bond-valence parameters of Brese and O'Keeffe (Reference Brese and O'Keeffe1991). The crystallographic information files have been deposited with the Principal Editor of Mineralogical Magazine and are available as Supplementary material (see below).

Table 2. Crystal and experimental data for ferriandrosite-(Ce).

*w = 1/[σ²(F _o²)+(1.6608P)²].

Table 3. Sites, fractional coordinates and isotropic (*) or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (in Ų) for ferriandrosite-(Ce).

Table 4. Selected bond distances (in Å) in ferriandrosite-(Ce).

Table 5. Refined site scattering vs. calculated site scattering (in electrons) and site population (in apfu) at the A and M sites in ferriandrosite-(Ce).

Table 6. Weighted bond-valence balance (in vu) in ferriandrosite-(Ce).

Notes: left and right superscripts indicate the number of equivalent bonds involving anions and cations, respectively. For sites with mixed occupancy, the bond valences have been weighted according to site populations given in Table 5.

*Anion positions involved in the hydrogen bond O10–H⋅⋅⋅O4 [d (O10⋅⋅⋅O4) = 2.843(4) Å]. According to Ferraris and Ivaldi (Reference Ferraris and Ivaldi1988), the bond-valence sum (BVS) of such a bond is 0.17 vu. Consequently, the corrected BVS at O4 and O10 sites are 1.62 and 1.16 vu, respectively.

Owing to the inhomogeneous nature of the material studied, powder X-ray diffraction data were collected only on the same crystal used for single-crystal X-ray diffraction, simulating a Gandolfi-like pattern using a Bruker D8 Venture single-crystal diffractometer equipped with a Photon III area detector and microfocused CuKα radiation. The observed X-ray diffraction pattern is reported in Table 7. Unit-cell parameters refined for the monoclinic space group P2₁/m from the powder data using the method of Holland and Redfern (Reference Holland and Redfern1997) on the basis of 19 unequivocally indexed reflections are as follows: a = 8.889(2) Å, b = 5.7356(16) Å, c = 10.0262(17) Å, β = 113.504(17)°, V = 468.75(12) ų and Z = 2.

Table 7. Powder X-ray diffraction data (d in Å) for ferriandrosite-(Ce).

Notes: Intensity and d _hkl were calculated using the software PowderCell 2.3 (Kraus and Nolze, Reference Kraus and Nolze1996) on the basis of the structural model given in Table 3. Only the reflections with I _calc > 10 are given, if not observed. Intensities were visually estimated: vs = strong; s = strong; ms = medium–strong; m = medium; mw = medium–weak; w = weak; vw = very weak.

1These reflections correspond to more than two calculated reflections with I < 10.

Crystal structure description

Ferriandrosite-(Ce) is isotypic with the other members of the epidote supergroup (e.g. Dollase, Reference Dollase1968). The crystal structure can be described as formed by single chains of edge-sharing M2-centered octahedra and zig-zag chains of M1-centered octahedra with M3-centered octahedra attached on alternate sides along b. Octahedral chains are bonded to Si₂O₇ and SiO₄ groups. In this octahedral–tetrahedral framework, two kinds of structural cavities occur, i.e. the smaller cavity hosting the nine-fold coordinated A1 site and the larger one where the ten-fold coordinated A2 site is located.

Cation sites

In ferriandrosite-(Ce), the A1 site has a mixed (Mn,Ca) site occupancy, with a Mn/(Mn+Ca) atomic ratio of 0.65. Mean atomic number (Table 5) and weighted bond-valence sum (Table 6) agree with this occupancy. As discussed by previous authors (e.g. Bonazzi et al., Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996; Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Armbruster, Akasaka and Minakawa2010, Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2013, Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015), the replacement of Ca²⁺ by Mn²⁺ promotes a decrease in the coordination number of the A1 site that can be described as six-fold coordinated. This coordination number decrease is related to the shift of the O6 and O9 atoms away from the A1 site, whereas O3 and O1 get closer to the cation site; O5 and O7 are unaffected by these changes. If one defines the difference between the bond distances A1–O6 and A1–O5 (with O6 and O5 being the seventh and sixth ligands of A1, respectively) as δ_7–6, a direct relation between the Mn²⁺ content at A1 and the δ_7–6 value can be observed (e.g. Bonazzi et al., Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996; Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Armbruster, Akasaka and Minakawa2010, Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2013, Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015; Biagioni et al., Reference Biagioni, Bonazzi, Pasero, Zaccarini, Balestra, Bracco and Ciriotti2019). In ferriandrosite-(Ce), this difference is 0.508 Å, to be compared with the theoretical value of 0.502 Å calculated on the basis of the regression line given by Bonazzi et al. (Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996). Moreover, a decrease in the ^[6]<A1–O> can be observed and indeed, ferriandrosite-(Ce) shows the low value of 2.314 Å, to be compared with 2.320, 2.322, 2.310 and 2.335 Å reported for manganiandrosite-(La), manganiandrosite-(Ce), vanadoandrosite-(Ce) and ferriandrosite-(La), respectively (Bonazzi et al., Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996; Cenki-Tok et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006; Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015).

The shift of the O9 site away from the cation located at the A1 position is associated with a reduction of the Si1–O9–Si2 bond angle that is related not only to the occupancy at the A1 site but also to the average bond length at M3 (e.g. Cenki-Tok et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006). In ferriandrosite-(Ce), O9 is at 3.148 and 3.227 Å from A1, with a Si1–O9–Si2 bond angle of 137.6(2)°; this angle is similar to those reported by Cenki-Tok et al. (Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006) for manganiandrosite-(Ce) and vanadoandrosite-(Ce), i.e. 137.4(6) and 137.4(8)°, respectively, and slightly smaller than that given by Nagashima et al. (Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015) for ferriandrosite-(La), i.e. 139.4(2)°; however, it is smaller than those reported by Biagioni et al. (Reference Biagioni, Bonazzi, Pasero, Zaccarini, Balestra, Bracco and Ciriotti2019) in manganiakasakaite-(La) and ferriakasakaite-(Ce), i.e. 140.88(19) and 144.47(14)°, respectively.

The A2 site of ferriandrosite-(Ce) is a REE-bearing site, with Ce as the dominant element. Bonazzi et al. (Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996) observed a relationship between the ratio of the cell parameters c/V and the REE content in species belonging to the series piemontite – ‘androsite’, as well as between the amount of REE and the β angle. In ferriandrosite-(Ce), the c/V ratio is 0.0215, and the β angle is 113.37°. On the basis of the relationship given by Bonazzi et al. (Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996), considering ΣREE = 1 atom per formula unit (apfu), one should have c/V = 0.0213 and β = 113.4°, in agreement with observed values. Actually, as stressed by Nagashima et al. (Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015), the value of the β angle is also affected by the Mn²⁺ at the A1 site. The value observed in ferriandrosite-(Ce) can be compared with those reported for other ‘androsites’, i.e. 113.88° in manganiandrosite-(La) (Bonazzi et al., Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996), 113.84° in ferriandrosite-(La) (Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015), 113.42° in manganiandrosite-(Ce), and 113.09° in vanadoandrosite-(Ce) (Cenki-Toc et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006).

Among the three independent M sites, cation assignments were based on refined mean atomic numbers (Table 5) and bond-valence sums (Table 6). M2 hosts Al only; a possible minor replacement of Al by Fe³⁺ (~2 at.%) or Ti⁴⁺ (~3 at.%) cannot be discarded, as observed in other samples, e.g. in manganiandrosite-(La) by Bonazzi et al. (Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996) who reported 4% Fe³⁺ in M2 and in ferriandrosite-(La) by Nagashima et al. (Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015) who hypothesised the presence of 0.04 Ti at the M2 site. The <M2–O> distance is 1.894 Å, to be compared with those observed in other androsites, i.e. 1.892 Å in manganiandrosite-(La) (Bonazzi et al., Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996), 1.902 and 1.894 Å in manganiandrosite-(Ce) and vanadoandrosite-(Ce), respectively (Cenki-Tok et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006), and 1.902 Å in ferriandrosite-(La) (Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015). The M3 site is occupied mainly by Mn²⁺, with minor Fe²⁺ and trace Mg²⁺. This occupancy is in keeping with the large observed <M3–O>, 2.185 Å. This average distance is larger than that observed in manganiandrosite-(La) (i.e. 2.159 Å, where 0.28 M³⁺ apfu occur), and similar to those reported by Cenki-Tok et al. (Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006) for M3 sites in manganiandrosite-(Ce) (2.197 Å) and vanadoandrosite-(Ce) (2.195 Å), where only Mn²⁺ occurs. The slight contraction observed in ferriandrosite-(Ce) is probable due to the minor Fe²⁺–Mn²⁺ replacement, in agreement with the smaller ionic radius of ^VIFe²⁺ (0.78 Å) with respect to that of ^VIMn²⁺ (0.83 Å), according to Shannon (Reference Shannon1976). The M1 site has a complex chemistry, with mainly Fe³⁺ and Mg²⁺, minor Al and Ti, and trace amounts of V. Whereas Fe³⁺ and Mg²⁺ occur in the same amount (0.41 apfu), the sum of trivalent cations (Fe³⁺ + Al + V) is larger than those of divalent ones (Mg), i.e. 0.54 vs. 0.41, with Fe³⁺ as the dominant constituent of the dominant valence (e.g. Bosi et al., Reference Bosi, Biagioni and Oberti2019a, Reference Bosi, Hatert, Hålenius, Pasero, Miyawaki and Mills2019b). The average bond distance is 2.012 Å, similar to those observed in other androsites, i.e. 2.010, 2.019, 2.011 and 2.002 Å for manganiandrosite-(La), manganiandrosite-(Ce), vanadoandrosite(Ce) and ferriandrosite-(La), respectively (Bonazzi et al., Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996; Cenki-Tok et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006; Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015). As discussed by Cenki-Tok et al. (Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006), the occurrence of Mn³⁺ at the M1 site increases the difference between the distances M1–O1 and M1–O4, owing to the Jahn–Teller effect shown by this cation; this difference is 0.231 and 0.227 Å in manganiandrosite-(La) and manganiandrosite-(Ce), respectively (Bonazzi et al., Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996; Cenki-Tok et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006), whereas in vanadoandrosite-(Ce) and ferriandrosite-(La) this difference is smaller, i.e. 0.161 and 0.137 Å, respectively (Cenki-Tok et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006; Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015). In ferriandrosite-(Ce), a difference of 0.145 Å was observed, in agreement with the absence of Mn³⁺ at the M1 site.

Three independent Si-centred tetrahedra occur in ferriandrosite-(Ce). Si1 and Si2 are bonded, sharing the O9 atom and forming Si₂O₇ groups; as discussed above, the Si1–O9–Si2 bond angle is sensitive to the occupancy at the A1 and the bond length at the M3 site. Si3 forms an isolated SiO₄ group. Average bond distances range between 1.624 and 1.637 Å, with bond-valence sums between 3.86 and 4.00 valence units (vu).

Anion sites

Ten independent anion sites occur in ferriandrosite-(Ce). Among them, eight are four-fold coordinated, with bond-valence sums ranging between 1.78 and 2.01 vu; these sites are occupied by O^2–. Two sites, namely O4 and O10, are three-fold coordinated and are underbonded, with bond-valence sums of 1.45 and 1.33 vu, respectively. The crystal-structure refinement allowed us to locate a residual maximum that was interpreted as a H atom located at 0.95(9) Å from O10. Moreover, the O10⋅⋅⋅O4 distance, 2.841(4) Å, agrees with a H bond, corresponding to a bond strength, calculated according to Ferraris and Ivaldi (Reference Ferraris and Ivaldi1988), of 0.17 vu. In this way, the correct bond-valence sums at O4 and O10 are 1.62 and 1.16 vu, respectively. These values agree with the mixed nature (O,F) of the O4 site, with an O/(O+F) atomic ratio close to 0.65 (in accord with both chemical and structural data) and the occurrence of (OH) at O10. Moreover, it is worth noting that the O10⋅⋅⋅O4 is similar to those observed in manganiandrosite-(Ce), ferriandrosite-(La), and vanadoandrosite-(Ce) (ca. 2.87 Å – Cenki-Tok et al., Reference Cenki-Tok, Ragu, Armbruster, Chopin and Medenbach2006; Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Nishio-Hamane, Tomita, Minakawa and Inaba2015), and shorter than that reported by Bonazzi et al. (Reference Bonazzi, Menchetti and Reinecke1996) in manganiandrosite-(La), i.e. 2.94 Å. This difference may be explained considering that the O4 site is bonded to two M1 and one M3 sites; in all the known species belonging to the androsite series but manganiandrosite-(La), the M3 site has a virtually pure M²⁺ occupancy. On the contrary, the latter species has 0.28 M³⁺ apfu, and consequently the bond strength on O4 is higher than in the other cases, thus favouring an elongation (= a weakening) of the H bond.