Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:36:29.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The extension of the western limb, Bushveld Complex (South Africa), at Cullinan Diamond Mine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R.G. Cawthorn  and
N. McKenna
R.G. Cawthorn*
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, 2050, South Africa
N. McKenna
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, 2050, South Africa
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mafic rocks of the Bushveld Complex at the southeastern end of the western limb, intersected in bore core from the Cullinan Diamond Mine, are described. A 260 m thick ultramafic body of orthopyroxene and chromite cumulate rocks, with mg# – 100*Mg/(Mg+Fe) – values from 77 to 84 and 0.25 to 0.5% Cr2O3 in the pyroxene, is considered to have affinity to the Critical Zone. Such an interpretation considerably extends the eastern limit of Critical Zone rocks of the western limb of the Bushveld Complex. The whole-rock composition of the lower, chilled basal contact of this body has 10% MgO and 500 ppm Cr, and is comparable to magmas considered parental to the Bushveld Complex. Due to intrusion of a younger sill, the upper contact is not preserved in the bore core. The cumulate rocks have higher interstitial component, inferred from incompatible trace element abundances (Zr, Ti and K), than normal Critical Zone rocks, interpreted to be a result of more rapid cooling due to proximity to the basal contact. The near-constancy of mg# in the pyroxene in the entire succession suggests that large volumes of magma flowed through this conduit, with only the liquidus phases of orthopyroxene and chromite being precipitated.

Five generations of sills, intruded into the underlying metasedimentary rocks, are identified. The oldest is tholeiitic, and was metamorphosed prior to the emplacement of the Bushveld Complex. The second equates to the magma proposed as being parental to the Bushveld Complex (2060 Ma). The third represents the products of differentiation of that magma. The fourth is syenitic, and related to the Pienaars River Alkaline Complex (1430–1300 Ma). The fifth is tholeiitic (1150 Ma), and cuts the Cullinan kimberlite.

Keywords

Bushveld ComplexCritical Zoneparental magmasorthopyroxenesillsmetamorphism
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , June 2006 , pp. 241 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, S.J. (1986) The effect of trapped liquid crystallization on cumulus mineral compositions in layered intrusions. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 93, 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, S.J. and Hoatson, D.M. (1994) The Munni Munni Complex: Western Australia: Stratigraphy, structure and petrogenesis. Journal of Petrology, 35, 715–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, P.J. (1994) Geology of the Premier Diamond Pipe. Proceedings of the XVth CMMI Congress, South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, 201–214.Google Scholar
Buchanan, D.L. (1975) The petrography of the Bushveld Complex intersected by boreholes in the Bethal area. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 78, 335–348.Google Scholar
Cameron, E.N. (1978) The Lower Zone of the Eastern Bushveld Complex in the Olifants River trough. Journal of Petrology, 19, 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, E.N. (1980) Evolution of the lower Critical Zone, central sector, eastern Bushveld Complex. Economic Geology, 75, 845–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, E.N. (1982) The upper Critical Zone of the eastern Bushveld Complex - precursor of the Merensky Reef. Economic Geology, 11, 1307–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawthorn, R.G. (1988) Discussion of metamorphic evidence for early post-Bushveld sill in the Penge Iron Formation, Transvaal Sequence, Eastern Transvaal. South African Journal of Geology, 91, 134–136.Google Scholar
Cawthorn, R.G. (1996) Re-evaluation of magma composition and processes in the uppermost Critical Zone of the Bushveld Complex. Mineralogical Magazine, 60, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawthorn, R.G. and Webb. SJ. (2002) Connectivity between eastern and western limbs of the Bushveld Complex. Tectonophysics, 330, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawthorn, R.G., Davies, G., Clubley-Armstrong, A. and McCarthy, T.S. (1981) Sills associated with the Bushveld Complex, South Africa: an estimate of the parental magma composition. Lithos, 14, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawthorn, R.G., Barnes, S.J., Ballhaus, C. and Malitch, K. (2005) Platinum-group element, chromium and vanadium deposits in mafic and ultramafic rocks. Economic Geology, 100th Anniversary Volume, pp. 215–249.Google Scholar
Cousins, C.A. (1959) The structure of the mafic portion of the Bushveld Complex. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 62, 179–189.Google Scholar
Davies, G., Cawthorn, R.G., Barton, J.M. and Morton, M. (1980) Parental magma to the Bushveld Complex. Nature, 287, 33–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, H.V. (2000) Implications of the chromium budget of the western limb of the Bushveld Complex. South African Journal of Geology, 103, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, H.V. and Cawthorn, R.G. (1996) The Bushveld Complex. Pp. 181–230 in: Layered Intrusions(Cawthorn, R.G., editor), Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, H.V., Teigler, B. and Maier, W.D. (1993) Cryptic variations in minor elements Al, Cr, Ti and Mn in Lower and Critical Zone orthopyroxenes of the western Bushveld Complex. Mineralogical Magazine, 57, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A.L. (1932) The Bushveld Igneous Complex of the Central Transvaal. Geological Survey of South Africa, Memoir, 28, 560 pp.Google Scholar
Harmer, R.E.J. (1985) Rb-Sr isotopic study of units of the Pienaars River Alkaline Complex, north of Pretoria, South Africa. South African Journal of Geology, 88, 215–224.Google Scholar
Hatton, C. and von Gruenewaldt, G. (1987) The geological setting and petrogenesis of the Bushveld chromitite layers. Pp. 109–43 in: Evolution of Chromium Ore Fields(C.W.|Stowe, editor). Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
Jansen, H. (1977) The geology of the country around Pretoria. Explanation of sheets 2527DA, DB, DC, DD and 2528CA, CB, CC, CD. Geological Survey of South Africa, Pretoria, 135 pp.Google Scholar
Lombaard, B.V. (1932) Felsites and their relationships to the Bushveld Complex. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 35, 125–190.Google Scholar
Maier, W.D. and Bowen, M.P. (1996). The UG2-Merensky Reef interval of the Bushveld Complex, northwest of Pretoria. Mineralium Deposita, 31, 386–393.Google Scholar
Maier, W.D. and Eales, H.V. (1994) Plagioclase inclusions in orthopyroxene and olivine of the UG2-Merensky Reef interval: regional trends in the western Bushveld Complex. South African Journal of Geology, 97, 408–414.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A.A. (1990) The stratigraphy, petrography and mineralogy of the Main Zone of the Northwestern Bushveld. South African Journal of Geology, 93, 818–831.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A.A. and Manthree, R. (2002) The Giant Mottled Anorthosite: a transitional sequence at the top of the Upper Critical Zone of the Bushveld Complex. South African Journal of Geology, 105, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raedeke, L.D. and McCallum, I.S. (1984) Investigations in the Stillwater Complex: Part II: Petrology and petrogenesis of the Ultramafic Series. Journal of Petrology, 25, 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SACS (South African Committee for Stratigraphy) (1980) Stratigraphy of South Africa (Kent, L.E., compiler). Handbook, 8, Geological Survey of South Africa, Pretoria, 690 pp.Google Scholar
Schümann, L.W. (1993) The geochemistry of the Upper Critical Zone of the Boshoek section of the western Bushveld Complex. Geological Survey of South Africa, Bulletin, 113, 88 pp.Google Scholar
Schümann, L.W., Grabe, P.-J. and Steenkamp, C.J. (1998) Chromium. The Mineral Resources of South Africa (Wilson, M.G.C. and Anhaeusser, C.R., editors) Council for Geoscience, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 90–105.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M.R. and Hulbert, L.J. (1985) Ultramafic sills beneath the eastern Bushveld Complex. Economic Geology, 80, 849–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teigler, B. and Eales, H.V. (1996) The Lower and Critical Zones of the western limb of the Bushveld Complex as intersected by the Nooitgedagt boreholes. Geological Survey of South Africa, Bulletin, 111, 126 pp.Google Scholar
Teigler, B., Eales, H.V. and Scoon, R.N. (1992) The cumulate succession in the Critical Zone of the Rustenburg Layered Suite at Brits, western Bushveld Complex. South African Journal of Geology, 95, 17–28.Google Scholar
Wager, L.R. and Brown, G.M. (1968) Layered Igneous Rocks. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 588 pp.Google Scholar
Walraven, F. (1987) Geochronological and isotopic of Bushveld Complex rocks from the Fairfield borehole at Moloto, northeast of Pretoria. South African Journal of Geology, 90, 352–360.Google Scholar
Willemse, J. (1959) The floor of the Bushveld Igneous Complex and its relationships with special reference to the eastern Transvaal. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 62, 21–83.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.H. (1982) The geology of the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe: the ultramafic rocks. Journal of Petrology, 23, 240–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.H., Lee, C.A. and Brown, R.T. (1999) Geochemistry of the Merensky Reef, Rustenburg section, Bushveld Complex: controls on the silicate framework and distribution of trace elements. Mineralium Deposita, 34, 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar