Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:07:33.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of stream sediment data for favourability of uranium mineralization in Tertiary granitic plutons of the Alaska Range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Michael Beyth  and
Carlotta McInteer
Michael Beyth
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, PO Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Carlotta McInteer
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, PO Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Favourability of uranium mineralization in six tertiary granitic plutons of the Alaska Range in the Talkeetna and Mt McKinley quadrangles was studied. The uranium concentrations of drainage sediment samples, which were collected and analysed by the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory for the National Uranium Resources Evaluation, were statistically evaluated and compared to those of the surrounding area using factor and cluster analyses. The results of this study suggest that five of the six plutons under consideration are likely to contain uranium mineralization. These plutons are probably a potential source rock for uranium in the region.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 46 , Issue 341 , December 1982 , pp. 475 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Permanent address: Geological Survey of Israel, Malkhe Yisrael 30, Jerusalem, Israel.

References

Aamodt, P. L., Jacobsen, S. I., and Hill, D. E. (1979) Uranium hydrogeochemical and stream sediment recon-naissance of the McGrath and Talkeetna NTMS quad-rangles, Alaska, including concentrations of forty-three additional elements. GJBX-123(79), US DOE, Grand Junction Office, Grand Junction, CO, 214 pp.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. (1975) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; Second edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 675 pp.Google Scholar
Reed, J. C., Jr. (1961) Geology of the Mount McKinley quadrangle, Alaska. US Geol. Survey, Bull. No. l108-A, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Reed, B. L., and Nelson, S. W. (1977) Geological map of Talkeetna quadrangle, Alaska (1:250000 scale). US Geol. Survey, Map No. MF-870-A.Google Scholar
Reed, B. L. Curtin, G. C, Griscom, A., Nelson, S. W., Singer, D. A., and Steele, W. C. (1979) The Alaskan Mineral Resource Assessment Program: Background information to accompany folio of geologic and mineral resource maps of the Talkeetna quadrangle, Alaska. US Geol. Survey, Circular No. 775, 17 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. R., Brown, G. C., Plant, J., and Ostle, D. (1979) Phil. Trans. R. Soc., Lond.. 291, 385–412.Google Scholar
Van Eeekhout, E. M., Warren, R. G., and Hill, D. E. (1979) Uranium hydrogeochemical and stream sediment reconnaissance of the Medfra and Mt McKinley NTMS quadrangles, Alaska, including concentrations of forty-three additional elements. GJBX-30(79), US DOE, Grand Junction Office, Grand Junction, CO, 210 pp.Google Scholar
Wedepohl, K. H., Ed. (1978) Elements Kr (36) to Ba (56). In Handbook of Geochemistry. Vol. II/4, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar