Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:08:15.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electronic and chemical structures of pyrite and arsenopyrite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Yu-Qiong Li ,
Qian He ,
Jian-Hua Chen  and
Cui-Hua Zhao
Yu-Qiong Li
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Metallurgy, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Qian He
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Metallurgy, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Jian-Hua Chen*
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Metallurgy, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Cui-Hua Zhao
Affiliation:
College of Material Science and Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first-principles plane-wave pseudopotential method is used to study the electronic and chemical structures of pyrite (FeS2) and arsenopyrite (FeAsS). The results indicate that an antibonding interaction occurs between Fe and As atoms in arsenopyrite. This interaction results in the Fe atom being repelled towards the S atom to stabilize antibonding orbitals, causing a larger S–Fe–S angle in arsenopyrite than in pyrite and a distortion in the arsenopyrite structure. In arsenopyrite, Fe–Fe distances are alternately long and short. The low spin density of the Fe d electrons supports this configuration in arsenopyrite. However, electron density calculations indicate that there is negligible electron density present between Fe atoms. This result indicates that cation-anion interactions are dominant in arsenopyrite. The pyrite Fe 3d orbital is split below the Fermi level, whereas the arsenopyrite Fe 3d orbital is not split, which can be attributed to the stronger interatomic bonding effects between Fe and S atoms in pyrite compared to arsenopyrite. It is found that the d-p orbital interactions between Fe and S atoms lead to bonding-antibonding splitting in both pyrite and arsenopyrite. However, the bonding effects between pyrite Fe and S atoms are stronger than in arsenopyrite. In arsenopyrite, the bonding interaction between the As 4p and Fe 3d orbitals is very weak, while the antibonding effect is very strong. The p-p orbital interaction is the dominant effect in As–S bonding. Frontier orbital calculations indicate that the Fermi levels of pyrite and arsenopyrite are notably close to each other, resulting in similar electrochemical activities. Orbital coefficient results show that the pyrite Fe 3d and S 3p orbitals are the active orbitals in the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), respectively. In the case of arsenopyrite, Fe 3d orbitals are very active in both the HOMO and LUMO. Moreover, the activity of the As 4p in the HOMO is greater than S 3p, whereas the opposite situation occurs in the LUMO. Based on these results, As atoms could be one of the active sites for the oxidation of arsenopyrite. In addition, separation of arsenopyrite and pyrite could be achieved by utilizing the difference in chemical reactivities of iron in the two minerals.

Keywords

pyritearsenopyritedensity functional theoryelectronic structuresfrontier orbitals
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 79 , Issue 7 , December 2015 , pp. 1779 - 1789
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraitis, P.K., Pattrick, R.A.D. and Vaughan, D.J. (2004) Variations in the compositional, textural and electrical properties of natural pyrite: a review. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 74, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, S.A., Goold, L.A., Nicol, M.J. and Granville, A. (1972) A determination various solution, products of the products of reaction between sulfide minerals and aqueous xanthate and a correlation of the with electrode rest potentials. Metallurgical Transactions, 3, 2613–2618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, P. (1977) Crystal structure refinement of a weakly anisotropic pyrite. American Mineralogist, 62, 1168–1172.Google Scholar
Bayliss, P. (1989) Crystal chemistry and crystallography of some minerals within the pyrite group. American Mineralogist, 74, 1168–1176.Google Scholar
Bindi, L., Moelo, Y., Leone, P. and Suchaud, M. (2012) Stoichiometric arsenopyrite, FeAsS, from La Roche-Balue Quarry, Loire-Atlantique, France: crystal structure and Mössbauer study. The Canadian Mineralogist, 50, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, M., Alfredsson, M., Brodholt, J., Wright, K. and Catlow, C.R.A. (2007) Arsenic incorporation into FeS2 pyrite and its influence on dissolution: a DFT study. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71, 624–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buerger, M.J. (1936) The symmetry and crystal structure of the minerals of the arsenopyrite group. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 95, 83–113.Google Scholar
Buerger, M.J. (1939) The crystal structure of gudmundite (FeSbS) and its bearing on the existence field of the arsenopyrite structural type. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 101, 290–316.Google Scholar
Chanturiya, V.A., Fedorov, A.A. and Matveeva, T.N. (2000) The effect of auroferrous pyrites non-stoichiometry on their flotation and sorption properties. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, 34, 163–170.Google Scholar
Cocula, V., Starrost, F., Watson, S.C. and Carter, E.A. (2003) Spin-dependent pseudopotentials in the solid-state environment: applications to ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic metals. Journal of Chemical Physics, 119, 7659–7671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkhill, C.L. Warren, M.C. and Vaughan, D.J. (2011) Investigation of the electronic and geometric structures of the (110) surfaces of arsenopyrite (FeAsS) and enargite (Cu3AsS4). Mineralogical Magazine, 75, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelro, R., Sandström, Å. and Paul, J. (2003) Full potential calculations on the electron bandstructures of sphalerite, pyrite and chalcopyrite. Applied Surface Science, 206, 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyert, V, Hock, K.H., Fiechter, S. and Tributsch, H. (1998) Electronic structure of FeS2: the crucial role of electron-lattice interaction. Physical Review B, 57, 6350–6359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, P.G., Linge, H.G. and Wadsley, M.W (1996) Oxidation of arsenopyrite (FeAsS) in acid. Part 1. Reactivity of arsenopyrite. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 26, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finklea, S.L. Cathey, L. and Amma, E.L. (1976) Investigation of the bonding mechanism in pyrite using the Mössbauer effect and X-ray crystallography. Acta Crystallographica, A32, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuess, H., Kratz, T., Topel-Schadt, J. andMiehe, G. (1987) Crystal structure refinement and electron microscopy of arsenopyrite. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 179, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, J.B. (1960) Direct cation-anion interactions in several oxides. Physical Review, 117, 1442–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, J.B. (1972) Energy bands in TX2 compounds with pyrite, marcasite, and arsenopyrite structures. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 5, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W (1964) Inhomogeneous electron gas. Physical Review B, 136, 864–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggins, M.L. (1922) The crystal structures of marcasite (FeS2), arsenopyrite (FeAsS) and loellingite (FeAs2). Physical Review, 19, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulliger, F. and Mooser, E. (1965) Semiconductivity in pyrite, marcasite and arsenopyrite phases. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 26, 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, W and Sham, L. J (1965) Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Physical Review, 140, A1133-A1138.Google Scholar
Kydros, K.A., Matis, K.A., Papadoyannis, I.N. and Mavros, P. (1993) Selective separation of arsenopyrite from an auriferous pyrite concentrate by sulphonate flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 38, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhlin, Y and Tomashevich, Y (2005) Pristine and reacted surfaces of pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite as studied by X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 32, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkhorst, H.J. and Pack, J.D. (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Physical Review B, 13, 5188–5192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morimoto, N. and Clark, L.A. (1961) Arsenopyrite crystal-chemical relations. American Mineralogist, 46, 1448–1469.Google Scholar
Nickel, E.H. (1968) Structural stability of minerals with the pyrite, marcasite, arsenopyrite and loellingite structures. The Canadian Mineralogist, 9, 311–321.Google Scholar
Opahle, I., Koepernik, K. and Eschrig, H. (2000) Full potential band structure calculation of iron pyrite. Computational Materials Science, 17, 206–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pack, J.D. and Monkhorst, H. J (1977) “Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations“-a reply. Physical Review B, 16, 1748–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdew, IE, Chevary, J.A., Vosko, S.H., Jachson, K.A., Pederson, M.R., Singh, D.J. and Fiolhais, C. (1992) Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Physical Review B, 46, 6671–6687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, K.C., Matteucci, M., Kuepper, K., Chiuzbaian, S. G, Barkowski, S. andNeumann, M. (2005) Core-level spectroscopic study of FeO and FeS2. Physical Review B,71,085102-1-085102-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsdell, L.S. (1925) The crystal structure of some metallic sulfides. American Mineralogist, 10, 281–304.Google Scholar
Schaufuss, A.G., Nesbitt, H.W., Scaini, M.J., Hoechst, H., Bancroft, M.G. and Szargan, R. (2000) Reactivity of surface sites on fractured arsenopyrite (FeAsS) toward oxygen. American Mineralogist, 85, 1754–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, P. and Wachter, P. (1976) Optical properties, phonons and electronic structure of iron pyrite (FeS). Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 9, 3363–3369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segall, M.D., Shah, R., Pickardk, C.J. and Payne, M.C. (1996) Population analysis of plane-wave electronic structure calculations of bulk materials. Physical Review B, 54, 16317–16320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirkeci, A.A. (2000) The flotation separation of pyrite from arsenopyrite using hexyl thioethylamine as collector. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 60, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tossell, J.A., Vaughan, D.J. and Burdett, J.K. (1981) Pyrite, marcasite, and arsenopyrite type minerals: crystal chemical and structural principles. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 7, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderbilt, D. (1990) Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Physical Review B, 41, 7892–7895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Barth, U. and Hedin, L.A. (1972) Local exchange-correlation potential for the spin polarized case. Journal of Physics C, 5, 1629–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Oertzen, G.U., Jones, R.T. and Gerson, A.R. (2005a) Electronic and optical propenies of Fe, Zn and Pb sulfides. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 32, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Oertzen, G.U., Skinner, W.M. and Nesbitt, H.W. (2005b) Ab initio and X-ray photoemission spectros-copy study of the bulk and surface electronic structure of pyrite (100) with implications for reactivity. Physical Review B, 72, 235427-1-235427-10.Google Scholar
Vosko, S.J., Wilk, L. andNusair, M. (1980) Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Canadian Journal of Physics, 58, 1200–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womes, M., Karnatak, R.C., Esteva, J.M., Lefebvre, I., Alla, G. Olivier-Fourcade, 1 and Jumas, J.C. (1997) Electronic Structures of FeS and FeS2: X-ray absorption spectroscopy and band structure calculations. Journal of Physical Chemistry Solids, 58, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B.J. and Strens, R.G.J. (1979) Diffuse reflectance spectra and optical properties of some sulphides and related minerals. Mineralogical Magazine, 43, 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar