Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:44:57.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calcite crystal growth orientation: implications for trace metal uptake into coccoliths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

V. E. Payne*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
R. E. M. Rickaby
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PR, UK
L. G. Benning
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
S. Shaw
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
*

Abstract

Inorganic calcite precipitation experiments were conducted to determine whether inducing specific orientations of calcite crystal growth can cause the enrichment of cations larger than Ca. Malonic acid (CH2(COOH)), a di-carboxylic acid, was used to poison growth on acute kink sites, promoting growth on obtuse kink sites, causing calcite crystals elongated along their c-axes to form in a mechanism similar to that seeninthe growth of E. huxleyi coccoliths. Calcite was precipitated with a range of malonic acid concentrations (0 to 10-1 M), and 9x10-5 M of either SrCl2 or MgCl2. The results show that calcite crystals precipitated in the presence of large malonic acid concentrations show significant elongation along the c axis, and suggest that increasing malonate concentrations corresponded with increasing DSr. Experiments with 10-1 M malonic acid caused elevated DSr comparable to that predicted for E. huxleyi coccolith calcite (Langer et al., 2006).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Henderson, L.M. and Kracek, F.C. (1927) The fractional precipitation of barium and radium chromates. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 49, 739–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, K., Stipp, S.L.S., Young, J. and Marsh, M.E. (2004) Biological control on calcite crystallization: AFM investigation of coccolith polysaccharide function. American Mineralogist, 89, 1586–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, G., Gussone, N., Nehrke, G., Riebesell, U., Eisenhauer, A., Kuhnert, H., Rost, B., Trimborn, S. and Thorns, S. (2006) Coccolith strontium to calcium ratios in Emiliania huxleyi. The dependence on seawater strontium and calcium concentrations. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S., Didymus, J.M., Sanderson, N.P. and Heywood, B.R. (1990) Morphological influence of functionalized and non-functionalized, -dicarboxylates on calcite crystallization. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, 86, 1873–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paquette, J. and Reeder, RJ. (1995) Relationship between surface structure, growth mechanism, and trace element incorporation in calcite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada, 59, 735–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickaby, R.E.M., Bard, E., Sonzogni, C. Rostek, F., Beaufort, L., Barker, S., Rees, G. and Schrag, D.P. (2007) Coccolith chemistry reveals secular variations in the global ocean carbon cycle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 253, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesoriero, A.J. and Pankow, J.F. (1996) Solid solution partitioning of Sr +, Ba +, and Cd + to calcite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada, 60, 1053–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Wai, P., de Jong, E.W., Westbroek, P., de Bruijn, W.C. and Mulder-Stapel, A.A. (1983) Ultrastructural polysaccharide localisation in calcifying and naked cells of the coccolithophori. Emiliania huxleyi. Protoplasma, 118, 157–168.Google Scholar
Young, J.R., Didymus, J.M., Bown, P.R., Prins, B. and Mann, S. (1992) Crystal assembly and phylogenetic evolution in heterococcoliths. Nature, 356, 516–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar