Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:37:44.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of crystallographic influence on material properties of calcite brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. Pérez-Huerta
Affiliation:
Department of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
M. Cusack*
Affiliation:
Department of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
W. Zhu
Affiliation:
Scottish Centre for Nanotechnology in Construction Materials, School of Engineering Sciences, University of Paisley, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK
*

Abstract

Calcium carbonate biominerals are frequently analysed in materials science due to their abundance, diversity and unique material properties. Aragonite nacre is intensively studied, but less information is available about the material properties of biogenic calcite, despite its occurrence in a wide range of structures in different organisms. In particular, there is insufficient knowledge about how preferential crystallographic orientations influence these material properties. Here, we study the influence of crystallography on material properties in calcite semi-nacre and fibres of brachiopod shells using nanoindentation and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The nano-indentation results show that calcite semi-nacre is a harder and stiffer (H ≈ 3—5 GPa; E = 50–85 GPa) biomineral structure than calcite fibres (H = 0.4—3 GPa; E = 30—60 GPa). The integration of EBSD to these studies has revealed a relationship between the crystallography and material properties at high spatial resolution for calcite semi-nacre. The presence of crystals with the c-axis perpendicular to the plane-of-view in longitudinal section increases hardness and stiffness. The present study determines how nano-indentation and EBSD can be combined to provide a detailed understanding of biomineral structures and their analysis for application in materials science.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruet, B.J.F., Qi, H.J., Boyce, M.C., Panas, R., Tai, K., Frick, L. and Ortiz, C. (2005) Nanoscale morphology and indentation of individual nacre tablets from the gastropod mollusc Trochus niloticus. Journal of Materials Research, 20, 24002419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, J., Cusack, M., Dalbeck, P. and Perez-Huerta, A. (2007) Comparison of the crystallographic structure of semi nacre and nacre by electron backscatter diffraction. Crystal Growth and Design, 7, 307310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Q.L., Cui, F.Z., Pu, G., Wang, R.Z. and Li, H.D. (2000) Crystal orientation, toughening mechanisms and a mimic of nacre. Materials Science Engineering C, 11, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griesshaber, E., Schmahl, W.W., Neuser, R., Pettke, T., Blum, M., Mutterlose, J. and Brand, U. (2007) Crystallographic texture and microstructure of terebratulide brachiopod shell calcite: An optimized materials design with hierarchical architecture. American Mineralogist, 92, 722734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuer, A.H., Fink, D.J., Laraia, V.J., Arias, J.L., Calvert, P.D., Kendall, K, Messing, G.L., Blackwell, J., Rieke, P.C., Thompson, D.H., Wheeler, A.P., Veis, A. and Caplan, A.I. (1992) Innovative materials processing strategies — A biomimetic approach. Science, 255, 10981105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hou, W.T. and Feng, Q.L. (2003) Crystal orientation preference and formation mechanism of nacreous layer in mussel. Journal of Crystal Growth, 258, 402408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katti, K, Katti, D.R., Tang, J., Pradhan, S. and Sarikaya, M. (2005) Modeling mechanical responses in a laminated biocomposite. Part II. Nonlinear responses and nuances of nano structure. Journal of Materials Science, 40, 17491755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, C, Zhao, Z., Bruet, B.J.F., Radovitzky, R., Boyce, M.C. and Ortiz, C. (2006) Nanoscale anisotropic plastic deformation in single crystal aragonite. Physical Review Letters, 96, 255505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtenegger, H.C., Schoberl, T., Bartl, M.H., Waite, H. and Stucky, G.D. (2002) High abrasion resistance with sparse mineralization: Copper biomineraliza-tion in worm jaws. Science, 298, 389392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstam, H.A. and Weiner, S. (1989) On Biomineralization. Oxford University Press, New York, 324 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M. (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. Journal of Materials Research, 7, 15641579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M. (2004) Measurements of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. Journal of Materials Research, 19, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Huerta, A., Cusack, M., Zhu, W., England, J. and Hughes, J. (2007) Material properties of brachiopod shell ultrastructure by nanoindentation. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4, 3339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schall, P., Cohen, I., Weitz, DA. and Spaepen, F. (2006) Visualizing dislocation nucleation by indenting colloidal crystals. Nature, 440, 319323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmahl, W.W., Griesshaber, E., Neuser, R., Lenze, A., Job, R. and Brand, U. (2004) The microstructure of the fibrous layer of terebratulide brachiopod shell calcite. European Journal of Mineralogy, 16, 693697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziiegner, S., Marquardt, K and Zimmermann, I. (2006) Influence of nanomechanical crystal properties on the comminution process of particulate solids in spiral jet mills. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 62, 194201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar