Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:33:52.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transformation of chernikovite into meta-uranocircite II, Ba(UO2)2(PO4)2.6H2O and study of its solubility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. F. Vochten
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Chemische en Fysische Mineralogie, Universiteit Antwerpen, Middleheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium
L. Van Haverbeke
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Anorganische Scheikunde, Universiteit Antwerpen, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium
K. Van Springel
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Chemische en Fysische Mineralogie, Universiteit Antwerpen, Middleheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium

Abstract

Chernikovite, (H3O)2(UO2)2(PO4)2, was synthesized and subsequently transformed into metauranocircite II, Ba(UO2)2(PO4)2.6H2O, by ion-exchange experiments. The crystals are lemon-yellow and strongly fluorescent. From solubility data a mean pKs value at 25°C was determined as 51.79 ± 0.21. For a cell volume of 16.31.7 Å3 and Z = 4 the density was calculated as 3.970 g/cm3 whereas the measured density is 3.964 g/cm 3. The X-ray powder pattern shows the following strongest lines: 3.609(60)(114), 3.470(60)(123), 2.9272(90)(132)2.9006(90)(312), 2.6065(80)(116), 2.4581(75)(233), 2.2015(100)(143 ; 143), 2.1869(100) (241 ; 226 ;241).

Type
Mineralogy
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beintema, J. (1938) On the composition and the crystallization of autunite and the meta-antunites. Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 57, 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čejka, Jr., Muck, A., and Čejka, J. (1985) Infrared spectra and thermal analysis of synthetic uranium micas and their deutero-analogues. Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Mh., 115-26.Google Scholar
Djogić, R., Sipos, L., and Branica, M. (1986) Characterization of uranium (VI) in seawater. Limnol.Oceanog., 31, 1122–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairchild, J.G. (1929) Base exchange in artificial autunites. Am. Mineral., 14, 2365–75.Google Scholar
Gabe, E.J., Le Page, Y., Charland, J.P., Lee, F.L., and White, P.F. (1989) An interactive program system for structure analysis. J. Appl. Cry St., 92, 384–7. Program P.P.LP.NRC-VAX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogfeldt, E. (1982) Stability Constants on Metal-ionComplexes. Part A: Inorganic Ligands, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Khosrawan-Sazedj, F. (1982) The Crystal Structure of Meta-Uranocircite II, Ba(UO2)2(PO4)2-6H2O. Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., 29, 193204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelsen, O.B. (1957) Photometric determination of phosphorus as molybdovanadophosphoric acid. Anal. Chem., 29, 60–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuffield, E.W. and Milne, I.H. (1953) Studies of Radioactive Compounds: VI. Meta-Uranocircite. Am. Mineral., 38, 476–88.Google Scholar
Perrin, D.D. (1984) Ionisation constants of inorganicacids and bases. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sillen, L.G. and Martell, A.E. (1964) StabilityConstants of Metal-ion Complexes. The Chemical Society, London.Google Scholar
Singer, E. and Matuchia, M. (1962) Erfahrungen mit Bestimmung von Uran in Erzen und Gesteinen mit Arsenazo III. Z. Anal. Chem., 191, 248–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vochten, R. (1990) Transformation of chernikovite and sodium autunite into lehnerite. Am. Mineral., 75, 221–5.Google Scholar
Vochten, R., De Grave, E., and Pelsmaekers, J. (1984) Mineralogical study of basschite in relation to its oxidation. Ibid., 69, 967-78.Google Scholar
Walenta, K. (1963) Uber die Barium-Uranylphosphat- mineralien Uranocircit I, Uranocircit II, Meta-Ura- nocircit I and Meta-Uranocircit II von Menzensch- wand im siidlichen Schwarzwald. Jh. Geol.Landesamt Baden-Wiirttemberg, 6, 113–35.Google Scholar
Wilmarth, V.R., Bauer, H.L., Staatz, M.H., and Wyant, D.G. (1952) Uranium in fluorite deposits. U.S. Geol. Survey. Circ, 220, p. 13.Google Scholar