Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:09:35.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some aspects of the application of image analysis to the study of fission tracks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

N. Petford
Affiliation:
Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK
J. A. Miller
Affiliation:
Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK

Abstract

Analysis and processing of electronic images generated using confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) provide a new means of counting and determining the angular distribution of fission tracks in crystalline solids. Using image analysis techniques, large numbers of fission tracks in external mica detectors can be counted rapidly, while measurement of aspect ratio and area of a track entry hole at its intersection with a surface can provide a means of assessing the angle of inclination of individual tracks within minerals and plastics. CSLM imaging, combined with image processing, offers a new and powerful way of probing the surfaces and interiors of crystalline materials. The techniques might also prove useful in the study of fluid inclusions and chemical zoning patterns in minerals.

Type
Image analysis
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: School of Geological Sciences, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Surrey, KT1 2EE, UK

References

Birkholtz, W., Steinert, M., Strobe, P., Stetsenko, S.G. and Perelygin, V.P. (1989) Computer-aided evaluation of SSNDT. Nucl. Tracks, 16, 281-6.Google Scholar
Fleischer, R.L., Price, P.B. and Walker, R.M. (1975) Nuclear Tracks in Solids: Principles and Applications. University of California Press, 504 pp.Google Scholar
Petford, N. and Miller, J.A. (1990) SLM Confocal Microscopy: an improved way of viewing fission tracks. J. GeoL Soc., 147, 217-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petford, N. and Miller, J.A. (1992) Three dimensional imaging of fission tracks using confocal SLM. Amer. Mineral., 77, 535-9.Google Scholar
Petford, N. and Miller, J.A. (1993) The study of fission tracks and other crystalline defects using confocal scanning laser microscopy. J. Microsc., 170, 201-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petford, N., Miller, J.A. and Briggs, J. (1993) The automated counting of fission tracks in an external detector by image analysis. Comps. Geosci., 19, 585-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petford, N., Miller, J.A. and Rankin, A.H. (1995) Preliminary confocal scanning laser microscopy studies of fluid inclusions in quartz. J. Microsc., 177 (in press).Google Scholar
Miller, J.A., Horsfall, J. A. C., Petford, N. & Tizard, R.H. (1993a). Proposed methods for correcting external detector fission track counts for tracks lost during etching. J. GeoL Soc., 150, 1051-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.A., Horsfall, J. A. C., Petford, N. and Tizard, R.H. (1993b) Counting fission tracks in mica external detectors. PAGOPH, 140, 667-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebetz, M., Zoppis, B., Rebrab, A., Grillon, P., Grentina, E. and Chambaudet, A. (1991) ATOM: a semiautomatic measuring system for the analysis of fission track characteristics in anisotropic minerals. Nucl. Tracks Radit. Meas., 19, 225-60.Google Scholar
Silk, E. C. H. and Barnes, R.S. (1959) Examination of fossil fission tracks with an electron microscope. Phil Mag., 4, 970-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, D., Clocchiatti, R. and Langevin, Y. (1984) Fission track dating of glass inclusions in volcanic quartz. Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., 71, 340-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. and Van den haute, P. (1992) Fission Track Dating. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 285 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. (1990) Confocal Microscopy. Academic Press, New York, 426 pp.Google Scholar