Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:17:59.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase relations in some tholeiitic lavas illustrated by the system R2O3–XO–YO–ZO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Brian G. Jamieson
Brian G. Jamieson*
Affiliation:
Grant Institute of Geology, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In order to aid the graphical presentation of analyses of igneous rocks, a pseudo-quaternary system R2O3XO-YO-ZO2 has recently been used (O'Hara, 1968, fig. 4). To test its ability to present the analytical data of tholeiitic basalts, the analyses of selected lavas have been projected into the system and then sub-projected into two planes. Lines, which represent the loci of liquid compositions in certain isobaric, pseudo-univariant equilibria, have been drawn on the basis of the melting relations of the basalts. After reading the pseudo-ternary phase diagrams resulting from the sub-projections, some genetic aspects of the lavas of Kilauea and Mauna Loa are discussed from a phase equilibrium standpoint.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 37 , Issue 289 , March 1970 , pp. 537 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, (N. L.), 1914. Amer. Journ. Sci. 38, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, (N. L.), 1928. The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks. Princeton (Princeton University Press) [M.A. 4-123].Google Scholar
Cohen, (L. H.), Ito, (K.), and Kennedy, (G. C.), 1967. Amer. Journ. Sci. 265, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, (D. S.), 1963. Mineralogical Society of America Special Paper 1, 227 [M.A. 17-323].Google Scholar
Davis, (B. T. C.) and Schairer, (J. F.), 1965. Carnegie Inst. Washington Year Book, 64, 123.Google Scholar
Fudali, (R. F.), 1965. Geochimica Acta, 29, 1063 [M.A. 17-475].Google Scholar
Hamilton, (D. L.), Burnham, (C. W.), and Osborn, (E. F.), 1964. Journ. Petrology, 5, 21 [M.A. 16-625].Google Scholar
Kuno, (H.), 1965. Ibid. 6, 302 [M.A. 17-625].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, (H.), Yamasaki, (K.), Iida, (C.), and Nagashima, (K.), 1957. Japan. Journ. Geol. Geog. 28, 179 [M.A. 14-214].Google Scholar
McBirney, (A. R.) and Williams, (H.), 1965. University of California, Berkeley, Publications in Geological Sciences, 55 [M.A. 17-553].Google Scholar
Macdonald, (G. A.), 1949. Bull. Geol. Soe. Amer. 60, 1541 [M.A. 11-151].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, (G. A.) and Eaton, (J. P.), 1964 . U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1171.Google Scholar
Macdonald, (G. A.) and Katsura, (T.), 1964. Journ. Petrology, 5, 82 [M.A. 16-656].Google Scholar
Moore, (J. G.), 1965. Amer. Journ. Sci. 263, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, (I. D.) and Tilley, (C. E.), 1963. Ibid. 261, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, (I. D.) and Tilley, (C. E.), 1964. Geol. Journ. 4, 143 [M.A. 17-324].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, (I. D.) and Tilley, (C. E.) and Scoon, (J. H.), 1957. Amer. Journ. Sei. 255, 241 [M.A. 14-146].Google Scholar
Murata, (K. J.) and Richter, (D. H.), 1966a. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 537-A.Google Scholar
Murata, (K. J.) and Richter, (D. H.), 1966b. Amer. Journ. Sci. 264, 194 [M.A. 18-59],CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, (G. D.), Nalwalk, (A. J.), and Hays, (E. E.), 1964. Marine Geology, 1, 333.Google Scholar
O'Hara, (M. J.), 1965. Scot. Journ. Geol. 1, 19 [M.A. 17-324].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, (M. J.), 1968. Earth-Science Reviews, 4, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, (E. F.) and Tait, (O. B.), 1952. Amer. Journ. Sci., Bowen volume, 413 [M.A. 12-81].Google Scholar
Powers, (H. A.), 1955. Geochimica Acta, 7, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, (M.), 1967. In Hess, (H. H.) and Poldervaart, (A.) (eds.) Basalts: The Poldervaart Treatise on Rocks of Basaltic Composition, 1, 271. New York (Interscience).Google Scholar
Richter, (D. H.), Ault, (W. U.), Eaton, (J. P.), and Moore, (J. G.), 1964. U.S. Geol. Surv. Praf Paper 474-D.Google Scholar
Roeder, (P.L.) and Osborn, (E. F.), 1966. Amer. Journ. Sci. 264, 428 [M.A. 18-172].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schairer, (J. F.), 1967. In Abelson, (P. H.) (ed.) Researches in Geochemistry, 2, 568. New York (Wiley).Google Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), 1960a. Journ. Petrology, 1, 47 [M.A. 14-436].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), 1960b. Geol. Mag. 97, 494 [M.A. 15-227].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.) and Scoon, (J. H.), 1961. Amer. Journ. Sci. 259, 60 [M. A. 15-227].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), Yoder, (H. S.) Jnr., and Schairer, (J. F.), 1963. Carnegie Inst. Washington Year Book, 62, 77.Google Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), Yoder, (H. S.) Jnr., and Schairer, (J. F.), 1964. Ibid. 63, 92.Google Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), Yoder, (H. S.) Jnr., and Schairer, (J. F.), 1965. Ibid. 64, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), Yoder, (H. S.) Jnr., and Schairer, (J. F.), 1966. Ibid. 65, 260.Google Scholar
Wentworth, (C. K.) and Winchell, (M.), 1947. Bull. Geol. Soe. Amer. 58, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, (R. E.), 1954. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 965-C.Google Scholar
Yoder, (H. S.) Jnr. and Tilley, (C. E.), 1962. Journ. Petrology, 3, 342 [M.A. 16-475].CrossRefGoogle Scholar