Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:49:05.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New varieties of mantle xenolith from the Massif Central, France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. Hutchison
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 5BD
C. T. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 5BD
P. Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 5BD
S. J. B. Reed
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Bullard Laboratories, Madingly Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ

Abstract

Spinel lherzolite xenoliths from two localities in the Massif Central are undepleted in Al2O3, CaO, and Na2O. One suite from Tarreyres, is K2O depleted and amphibole-bearing whereas the other, from Monistrol d'Allier some 18 km away, is amphibole-free and has a higher mean K2O content of 0.035 wt.%. We present bulk major and minor element abundances in a harzburgite and a lherzolite from each locality and microprobe analyses of their constituent phases. Amphibole-bearing lherzolite and its pyroxenes are light-rare earth element (LREE) depleted, whereas amphibole-free lherzolite and its pyroxenes are LREE enriched. Both harzburgites and their pyroxenes are LREE enriched and one rock contains LREE enriched glass. The harzburgites are like harzburgite xenoliths from elsewhere but each lherzolite represents a previously unrecognized type of mantle in terms of the mineralogy and REE content. The implication for basalt genesis are briefly discussed.

Type
Petrology
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, S. (1983) Paper 83-15, Geol. Surv. Canada. Chauvel, C, and Jahn, B.-M. (1984) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 48, 93-110.Google Scholar
Frey, F.A. (1984) In Rare earth element geochemistry (P. Henderson, ed.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 153203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, F.A. and Green, D.H. (1974) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 38, 1023-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vand Prinz, M. (1978) Earth Planet Sci. Lett, 38, 129-76.Google Scholar
Henderson, P., and Williams, C.T. (1981) J. Radioanal. Chem, 67, 445-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, R., Paul, D.K., Chambers, A.L., and Harris, P.G. (1975) Mineral. Mag, 40, 153-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurat, G., Palme, H., Spettel, B., Baddenhausen, H., Hofmeister, H., Palme, C, and Wanke, H. (1980) Geochim. Cosmochim Acta, 44, 45-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, M. (1983) In Continental basalts and mantle xenoliths (C. J. Hawkesworth and M. J. Norry, eds.). Shiva, Nantwich, 92110.Google Scholar
Ottonello, G. (1980) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 44, 1885-901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, S.J.B. (1981) In Microbeam analysis (R. H. Geiss, ed.). San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 8790.Google Scholar
Roeder, P.L., and Emslie, R.F. (1970) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol, 29, 275-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stosch, H.G., and Seek, H.A. (1980) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 44, 457-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R.N., Gibson, I.L., Marriner, G.F., Mattey, D.P., and Morrison, M.A. (1980) J. Petrol, 21, 265-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakita, H., Rey, P., and Schmitt, R.A. (1971) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, Suppl, 2, 1319-29.Google Scholar