No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
GEOLIFE – Geomaterials for the environment, technology and human activities. Preface to the October 2014 special set of papers arising from presentations at the Goldschmidt 2013 conference
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2018
Extract
This special issue of the Mineralogical Magazine springs from the session we organized as part of the Goldschmidt 2013 conference in Florence. The title we proposed “GEOLIFE – Geomaterials for environment, technology and human activities” reflects our feeling that a wise use of the expertise gained by mineralogists while studying the crystal chemistry, as well as the chemical and physical properties of minerals in rocks and soils, still plays an important role in what is called “The cutting edge in Mineralogy and Mineral Physics”.
Indeed, the current expertise in the physical, chemical and structural characterization of geomaterials, i.e. minerals, rocks and their synthetic analogues, now allows us to design innovative applications both for technological and environmental purposes. During the meeting we discussed some frontier work on phases produced naturally by the Earth ‘laboratory’ or fabricated within academic laboratories, which have the potential to improve the quality of life for current and future generations.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014
References
Ardit, M., Cruciani, G., Dondi, M., Garbarino, G.L., and Nestola, F. (2014) Phase transitions during compression of thaumasite, Ca3Si(OH)6(CO3)(SO4)·12H2O: A high-pressure synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction study. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1193–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croce, A., Allegrina, M., Trivero, P., Rinaudo, C., Viani, A., Pollastri, S. and Gualtieri, A.F., (2014) The concept of ‘end of waste’ and recycling of hazardous materials: in depth characterization of the product of thermal transformation of cement-asbestos. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1177–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leardini, L., Martucci, A., Braschi, I., Blasioli, S. and Quartieri, S. (2014) Regeneration of high-silica zeolites after sulfamethoxazole antibiotic adsorption: a combined in situ high-temperature synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction and thermal degradation study. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1141–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumpkin, G.R., Gao, Yan, Gieré, R., Williams, C.T., Mariano, A.N., and Geisler, T. (2014) The role of Th-U minerals in assessing the performance of nuclear waste forms. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1071–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martucci, A., Braschi, I., Marchese, L. and Quartieri, S. (2014a) Recent advances in clean-up strategies of waters polluted with sulfonamide antibiotics: a review of sorbents and related properties. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1115–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martucci, A., Leardini, L., Nassi, M., Sarti, E., Bagatin, R. and Pasti, L. (2014b) Removal of emerging organic contaminants from aqueous systems: adsorption and location of methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether on synthetic ferrierite. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1161–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novembre, D., Pace, C. and Gimeno, D. (2014) Syntheses and characterization of zeolites K-F and W type using a diatomite precursor. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1209–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Veelen, A., Preedy, O., Qi, J., Law, G.T.W., Morris, K., Mosselmans, J.F.W., Ryan, M.P., Evans, N.D.M. and Wogelius, R. (2014) Uranium and technetium interactions with wüstite [Fe1–xO] and portlandite [Ca(OH)2] surfaces under geological disposal facility conditions. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1097–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yebra-Rodriguez, A., Fernandez-Barranco, C., La Rubia, M.D., Yebra, A., Rodriguez-Navarro, A.B., and Jimenez-Millan, J., (2014) Thermooxidative degradation of injection moulded sepiolite/polyamide 66 nanocomposites. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 1227–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar