Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:29:16.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geochemistry and mineralogy of Triassic sandstones and implications for groundwater composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

D. A. Spears
D. A. Spears*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Borehole samples from the Wildmoor Sandstone Formation have been analysed for whole-rock major and trace elements and the mineralogy determined by X-ray diffraction and conventional thin sections. The forty-two samples studied were obtained from boreholes drilled in a long established effluent site and from control boreholes away from the site. Elements are associated with one or more of calcite, quartz, K-feldspar, and clay plus oxide. The most important mineralogical change due to current infiltration is progressive loss of calcite. Background element concentrations are established and only Pb, and in one sample Cu and Zn, are found in higher concentrations representing anthropogenic additions to the system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 47 , Issue 343 , June 1983 , pp. 183 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, A. D. and Turner, P. (1982) J. Sed. Petrol. 52,187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, F. (1971) Ratio Correlation. University of Chicago Press, 99 pp.Google Scholar
Cosgrpve, M. E. (1973) Chem. Geol. 11, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, W. M., and Morgan-Jones, M. (1976) Q. J. Eng. Geol. 9, 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennie, K. W. (1972) Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 56, 1048–71.Google Scholar
Henson, M. R. (1973) Proc. Geol. Assoc. 84, 429–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, R. L., and Langmuir, D. (1974) Geochim. Google Scholar
Jacobson, R. L. Cosmochim. Acta, 38, 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeans, C. V. (1978) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 289, 549–639.Google Scholar
Norrish, K., and Hutton, J. T. (1969) Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta, 33, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, I. E. (1975) J. Sed. Petrol. 45, 636–50.Google Scholar
Rentzsch, J., and Kampe, A. (1979) In Origin and distribution of the elements (Ahrens, L. A., ed.). Second Symposium, Paris 1977, Pergamon, 751–66.Google Scholar
Spears, D. A., and Reeves, M. J. (1975) Geol. Mag. 112, 585–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, G., Audley-Charles, M. G., Elliott, R. E., Evans, W. B., Ivimey-Cook, H. C, Kent, P. E., Robinson, P., Shotton, F. W., and Taylor, F. M. (1980) A correlation of Triassic rocks in the British Isles. Geol. Soc. London, Special Report No. 13, 78 pp.Google Scholar
Wills, L. X (1976) Rep. Inst. Geol Sci. No. 7612, 211 pp.Google Scholar