Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:13:17.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A further study of analcime solid solutions in the system NaAlSi3O8-NaAISiO4-H20, with particular note of an analcime phase transformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Ki-Tae Kim  and
B. J. Burley
Ki-Tae Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, McMaster University, HamiltonOntarioCanada
B. J. Burley
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, McMaster University, HamiltonOntarioCanada
*
* Present address 3405 Keystone Ave., no. 2, Los Angeles, CA 90034, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The stability field of analcime solid solutions in the system NaAlSi3O8-NaAlSiO4-H2O has been previously determined by Kim and Burley (1971a). These experiments are re-examined with a view to determining the variations of the room-temperature cell parameters of analcime as a function of temperature of synthesis and composition. It is shown from this evidence that most of the analcime solid solutions in these experiments are equilibrium compositions. The increase in the cell dimension of quenched analcime solid solution is found to be 5 × 10−5 Å/°C. It is suggested that birefringence in analcime is induced by low water-pressure relative to total pressure. A phase transition appears to be observed in quenched analcimes of this study and is thought to be the same as that in the Golden analcime reported by Yoder and Weir (1960).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 43 , Issue 332 , December 1980 , pp. 1035 - 1045
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brögger, (W. C.), 1980. Z. Krystallogr. Mineral. 16, 565–85.Google Scholar
Burley, (B. J.) and Freeman, (E. B.), 1959. Can. Mineral. 6, 372–79.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D. S.) and Whetten, (J. T.), 1967. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 78, 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, (L. J.) and Edgar, (A. D.), 1978. Can. J. Earth Sci. 15, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, (G. C.), Wasserburg, (G. J.), Heard, (H. C.), and Newton, (R. C.), 1962. Am. J. Sei. 260, 50l–21.Google Scholar
Kim, (K. T.) and Burley, (B. J.), 1971a. Can. J. Earth Sci. 8,311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, (G. C.) Kim, (K. T.) 1971b. Ibid., 549–58.Google Scholar
Kennedy, (G. C.) Kim, (K. T.) 197IC. Ibid., 558–72.Google Scholar
Klein, (C.), 1897. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 290–354.Google Scholar
Liou, (J.), 1971. Lithos, 4, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzi, (F.) and Galli, (E.), 1978. Am. Mineral. 63, 448–60.Google Scholar
Náray-Szabó, (S. V.), 1938. Z. Kristallogr. 99, 277–82.Google Scholar
Pearce, (T. H.), 1970. Can. J. Earth Sci. 7, 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pertsowsky, (R.), 1973. Thèse, Doctorat 3e Cycle, L'Université de Paris VI.Google Scholar
Peters, (Tj.), Luth, (W. C.), and Tuttle, (O. F.), 1966. Am. Mineral. 51, 736–53.Google Scholar
Saha, (P.), 1959 Am. Mineral. 44, 300–13.Google Scholar
Stewart, (F. H.), 1941. Mineral. Mag. 26, 1–8.Google Scholar
Taylor, (W. H.), 1930. Z. Kristallogr. 74, 1–19.Google Scholar
Weibye, (P. C.), 1850. Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff). 79, 303.Google Scholar
Woolley, (A. R.) and Symes, (R. F.), 1976. Lithos 9,9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, (H. S.) and Weir, (C. E.), 1960. Am. J. Sci. 258A, 420–33.Google Scholar