Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:26:20.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation of the hour-glass structure in augite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

D. F. Strong
D. F. Strong*
Affiliation:
Grant Institute of Geology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study of augite in over three hundred thin sections of mainly alkalic rocks permits the distinction of two main types of hour-glass structure. The common ‘swallow-tailed’, sometimes skeletal augite crystals are found in the fine-grained groundmass of many rock types, and it is suggested that rapid crystallization alone accounts for their formation. Hence, this type of hour-glass structure has been called ‘quench hour-glass’. The hour-glass structures of larger augite crystals of porphyritic and coarse-grained rocks are commonly described as hour-glass ‘zoning’, as they result primarily from compositional differences between the different sectors. These were formed under conditions of relatively slower cooling than the ‘quench hour-glass’, and thus cannot be explained in the same way. They are thought to have formed by a process involving adsorption of impurities on a particular crystal face so as to impede growth of these faces, producing an initial skeleton of hour-glass form, which is completed by later crystallization of augite richer in FeO, Na2O, TiO2, and Al2O3. This hypothesis also explains the patchy zoning of other augite crystals, casting doubt on some petrogenetic interpretations of such zones as core zones.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 37 , Issue 288 , December 1969 , pp. 472 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buckley, (H. E.), 1951. Crystal Growth, New York (Wiley).Google Scholar
Blackerby, (B. A.), 1968. Amer. Min. 53, 954-62.Google Scholar
Deer, (W. A.), Howie, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1963. Rock-forming Minerals, 2, Chain Silicates. Google Scholar
Drever, (H. I.) and Johnston, (R.), 1957. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 63, 289-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, (O. C.), 1960. Rept. 21St Sess. Int. Geol. Congr., Norden, 21, pt. 21, 194–200.Google Scholar
Frisch, (T.) and Schmincke, (H. U.), 1968. Int. Symposium on Volcanoes, Spain, Canary Islands, September, 1968 (abstract).Google Scholar
Gaubert, (P.), 1911. Recherches récentes sur lesfacies des eristaux. Soc. Chem. Phys., Paris (Hermann).Google Scholar
Heinrich, (E. WM.), 1965. Microscopic Identification of Minerals. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mullin, (J. W.), 1961. Crystallization. London (Butterworths).Google Scholar
Preston, (J.), 1966. Amer. Min. 51, 1227-33.Google Scholar
Rosenbusch, (H.), 1905. Mikroskopische Physiographic, 1, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Scott, (A.), 1914. Min. Mag. 17, 100-10.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, (J. F. G.), 1957. Geol. Mag. 94, 123-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyllie, (P. J.), Cox, (K. G.), and Biggar, (G. M.), 1962. Journ. Petrology, 3, 238-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yagi, (Kenzo) and Onuma, (Kosuke), 1967. Journ. Fac. Sci., Hokkaido Univ., ser. 4, 13, no. 4, P. 463.Google Scholar