Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:09:53.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidote supergroup nomenclature: The names hancockite, niigataite and tweddillite reinstated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Olav Revheim  and
Vandall T. King
Olav Revheim*
Affiliation:
Mindat.org management board, Veddertoppen 48a, 4640 Søgne, Norway
Vandall T. King
Affiliation:
Mindat.org management board, P.O. Box 90888, Rochester, NY 14609, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The epidote-group nomenclature report by Armbruster et al. (2006) provides a clear and concise definition of the epidote group, and a set of consistent rules and naming conventions for establishing new subgroups and mineral species within what is now the epidote supergroup (Mills et al., 2009). In order to comply with these rules, it was decided to rename the already approved minerals hancockite, niigataite and tweddillite to epidote-(Pb), clinozoisite-(Sr) and manganipiemontite-(Sr), respectively. These names were already well established within the mineral community, and the renaming caused some controversy. Recent International Mineralogical Association guidelines (Hatert et al. 2013) have given priority to the historical provenance of names over nomenclature consistency. Hatert et al. (2013) state as a main principle that "retroactivity will not be applied", but that "Every change in nomenclature has to go through the CNMNC, and is examined on its own merit", thus establishing a mechanism for re-instating historical names on a case by case basis. The CNMNC (Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification Committee of the International Mineralogical Association) has therefore decided, as an exception to the main principle, to re-instate hancockite, niigataite and tweddillite. In part to maintain the historical names but, more importantly, re-establish the link between the mineral names and their structural and chemical definitions.

Keywords

Commission on New MineralsNomenclature and Classification CommitteeCNMNCepidote supergroup nomenclaturehancockiteniigataitetweddillite
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 80 , Issue 5 , August 2016 , pp. 877 - 880
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armbruster, T., Gnos, E., Dixon, R., Gutzmer, J., Hejny, C, Dobelin, N. and Medenbach, O. (2002) Manganvesuvianite and tweddillite, two new Mn3+ minerals from the Kalahari manganese fields, South Africa. Mineralogical Magazine, 66, 137—150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armbruster, T., Bonazzi, P., Akasaka, M., Bermanec, V., Chopin, C., Giere, R., Heuss-Assbichler, S., Liebscher, A., Menchetti, S., Pan, Y and Pasero, M. (2006) Recommended nomenclature of epidote-group minerals. European Journal of Mineralogy, 18, 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, P., Kaesz, H.D. and Nickel, E.H. (2005) The use of chemical element adjectival modifiers in mineral nomenclature. The Canadian Mineralogist, 43, 1429–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E.A.J.. (2008a) Tidying up mineral names: an IMA-CNMNC scheme for suffixes, hyphens and diacritical marks. Mineralogical Record, 39, 131—135.Google Scholar
Burke, E.A.J. (2008b) Suffixes in Mineral Names. Elements, 4, 96 Google Scholar
Christy, A.G. and Gatedal, K. (2005) Extremely Pb-rich rock-forming silicates including a beryllian scapolite and associated minerals in a skarn from Långban, Värmland, Sweden. Mineralogical Magazine, 69, 995–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chukanov, N.V. (2013) Infrared Spectra of Mineral Species. Extended Library. Springer Verlag, 1701 pp.Google Scholar
Dollase, W.A. (1968) Refinement and comparison of the structures of zoisite and clinozoisite. American Mineralogist, 53, 1882–1898.Google Scholar
Dollase, W.A. (1971) Refinement of the crystal structures of epidote, allanite and hancockite. American Mineralogist, 56, 447–464.Google Scholar
Dunn, P.J. (1985) The lead silicates from Franklin, New Jersey: occurrence and composition. Mineralogical Magazine, 49, 721–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, P.J. (1995) Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey: The World's Most Magnificent Mineral Deposits. Privately published.Google Scholar
Hatert, F., Mills, S.J., Pasero, M. and Williams, P.A. (2013) CNMNC guidelines for the use of suffixes and prefixes in mineral nomenclature, and for the preservation of historical names. European Journal of Mineralogy, 25, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, EC, Oberti, R., Harlow, G.E., Maresch, W.V., Martin, R.F., Schumacher, J.C. and Welch, M.D. (2012) Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup. American Mineralogist, 97, 2031–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtstam, D. and Langhof, J. (1994) Hancockite from Jakobsberg, Filipstad, Sweden: the second world occurrence. Mineralogical Magazine, 58, 172—174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jančev, S. and Bermanec, Y (1998) Solid Solition Between Epidote and Hancockite from Nežilovo Macedonia. Geologia Croatica, 51, 23–26.Google Scholar
Leake, B.E. (1978) Nomenclature of amphiboles. The Canadian Mineralogist, 16, 501–520.Google Scholar
Leake, B.E., Woolley, A.R., Arps, C.E.S.., Birch, W.D., Gilbert, M.C., Grice, J.D., Hawthorne, EC, Kato, A., Kisch, H.J., Krivovichev, V.G., Linthout, K., Laird, J., Mandarino, J.A., Maresch, WY, Nickel, E.H., Rock, N.M.S., Schumacher, J.C., Smith, D.C., Stephenson, N.C.N., Ungaretti, L., Whittaker, E.J.W.. and Guo, Y. (1997) Nomenclature of amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. American Mineralogist, 82, 1019—1037.Google Scholar
Mills, S.J., Hatert, F., Nickel, E.H. and Ferraris, G. (2009) The standardisation of mineral group hierarchies: application to recent nomenclature proposals. European Journal of Mineralogy, 21, 1073—1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyajima, H., Matsubara, S., Miyawaki, R. and Hirokawa, K. (2003) Niigataite, CaSrAl3(Si2O7)(SiO4)O(OH): Sr-analogue of clinozoisite, a new member of the epidote group from Itoigawa-Ohmi district, Niigata Prefecture, central Japan. Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences, 98, 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, E.H. (1992) Nomenclature for mineral solid solutions. American Mineralogist, 77, 660—662.Google Scholar
Nickel, E.H. and Grice, J.D. (1998) The IMA commission on new minerals and mineral names: Procedures and guidelines on mineral nomenclature. Mineralogy and Petrology, 64, 237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palache, C. (1935) The Minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, Sussex County, New Jersey. USGS Professional Papers, 180. Government Printing Office, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Pasero, M., Kampf, A.R., Ferraris, C., Pekov, I.V., Rakovan, J. and White, T.J. (2010) Nomenclature of the apatite supergroup minerals. European Journal of Mineralogy, 22, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfield, S.L. and Hyde, W.C. (1899) Some new minerals from the zinc mines at Franklin N.J., and note concerning the chemical composition of ganomalite. American Journal of Science. Third series, 8, 339—353.Google Scholar