Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:39:59.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electron-optical studies of phyllosilicate intergrowths in sedimentary and metamorphic rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

S. H. White ,
J. M. Huggett  and
H. F. Shaw
S. H. White
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Imperial College, London SW7, UK
J. M. Huggett
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Imperial College, London SW7, UK
H. F. Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Imperial College, London SW7, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The results of a microstructural study by backscattered scanning electron microscopy and a microchemical study using X-ray microprobe analysis of phyllosilicate intergrowths from sandstones, shales, metagreywackes, and low-grade schists are presented. The microstructural study revealed that the intergrowths thicken and become more coherent with metamorphic grade; the intergrowths change from incoherent to coherent in the anchizone. The increasing coherency is mirrored by an increase in the crystallinity indices of the illites/phengites. Chemical analysis of the individual intergrowth phases was difficult in the sediments and no systematic compositional variations were recorded. However, clear compositional trends with increasing metamorphic grade emerged in the phengites from the metagreywackes and schists, but in the chlorites only slight compositional changes were recorded.

Keywords

electron microscopyelectron microprobe analysisphyllosilicatesillitephengitesedimentary rocksmetamorphic rocks
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 49 , Issue 352 , June 1985 , pp. 413 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: BP Petroleum Development Limited, Britannic House, London EC2, UK.

References

Cooper, A. F. (1974) N.Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 17, 855-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoyer De Segonzac, G. (1970) Sedimentology, 15, 281–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, J. M. (1979) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 68, 125-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, M. (1978) J. Petrol. 19, 93-135.Google Scholar
Huggett, J. M. (1984) Sediment. Geol. 40, 233-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, J. M. and White, S. H. (1982) Clays Clay Minerals, 30, 232-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iijima, S., and Zhu, J. (1982) Am. Mineral. 67, 1195-205.Google Scholar
Knipe, R. J. (1979) Bull. Mineral. 102, 206-9.Google Scholar
Knipe, R. J. (1981) Tectonophysics, 78, 249-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M. G., and Hall, G. E. (1981) Am. Mineral. 66, 362-8.Google Scholar
Pye, K., and Krinsley, D. H. (1983) Nature, 304, 618-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, D. R., and Ferry, J. M. (1983) Am. Mineral. 68, 1160-8.Google Scholar
Velde, B. (1983) In Sediment Diagenesis (Parker, A. and Sellwood, B. W., eds.) NATO AST Series C: Mathematical and Physical Series W/l15 215-68. D. Reidel Holland.Google Scholar
White, S. H., and Johnston, D. C. (1981) J. Struct. Geol. 3, 279-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. H., Shaw, H. F., and Huggett, J. M. (1984) J. Sediment. Petrol. 54, 487-94.Google Scholar